User talk:Anonymous453434567

March 2023
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Greenwich, Connecticut, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scarsdale Public Schools, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Scarsdale, New York, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * With this edit you are editing against a consensus at Talk:Chanhassen, Minnesota. Also, please stop adding unsourced content about the ZIP code boundaries of Scarsdale; these have no relevance to the city boundaries, per .  Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, but I respectfully disagree. This is not about "Best Place to Live" it is about the specific and notable wealth of this town. If you look at other municipalities at the extreme end of wealth, you will find references to that fact.

April 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 13:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing Scarsdale, New York for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Wealth of Scarsdale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wealth of Scarsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wealth of Scarsdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MrOllie (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Anonymous453434567. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)