User talk:AnonymousUsernam33/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for AnonymousUsernam33's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Cristian Cuevas review of this sandbox
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes it is in a neutral tone.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes the citations do follow the MEDRS.

Are the citations formatted correctly? The first citation is formatted correctly, the second one is not but they did state in their sandbox that is was automatically formatted for them which could get fixed.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes it does make sense to have added the extra information that they added to the main article.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Yes they can add to the society and culture section. They can also add more information in the history of the name section. There are a few other sections that more information can be added. Cristiancuev (talk) 02:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Andrew Beszhak Peer Review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes, definitely.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? The second source seems like a primary source, not a secondary one. The guidelines prefer secondary sources to primary ones, but I'm not sure if this source is appropriate. The content is certainly applicable.

Are the citations formatted correctly? The first citation is. The second citation doesn't look right but the author notes that the automatic citation tool produced a weird-looking citation.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the content relates to the main article clearly.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? I don't think there's a better spot than the one that they're currently in. They provide info on IGF-1 therapy for various conditions and that's exactly the heading they have their content under.

Abeszhak (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)