User talk:Anonymous Characters 2

January 2016
Hello, I'm GeneralizationsAreBad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Southampton F.C. has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GABHello! 01:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Southampton F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Harper, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Luke Harper was changed by Anonymous Characters 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878168 on 2016-01-28T01:45:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Austin. GABHello! 01:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. only (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anonymous Characters 2


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Anonymous Characters 2, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)