User talk:Anonymous Gnostic

Welcome!
Hi Anonymous Gnostic! I noticed your contributions to Infatuation&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! gnu 57 03:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi thanks for the welcome. I'd like to ask a Winston with regards to the following policy:

"Ambox scales.svg Neutral point-of-view (or NPOV) means that content is written objectively and without bias, merely presenting the facts and notable viewpoints of others. Encyclopedias are inherently written in this way, as the truth is often subjective, and it would make no sense to have an article that favored a particular viewpoint. Striving for a neutral point-of-view helps prevent articles from becoming advertisements or propaganda."

It states that the truth is often /subjective/, shouldn't it state that the truth is often /objective/ instead? Anonymous Gnostic (talk) 03:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

By "Winston" I actually meant "question" (Auto-correct error :|) Anonymous Gnostic (talk) 04:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I certainly see your point; perhaps it would be better to say "a matter of prudential judgement". "Inherently written this way" gives me pause as well. For a longer and more coherent explanation of NPOV, please see Neutral point of view. Cheers, gnu 57 03:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)