User talk:Anonymous Marlin

June 2023
Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Desmond Doss, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desmond Doss. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DarkAudit (talk) 08:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desmond Doss, you may be blocked from editing. DarkAudit (talk) 08:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Desmond Doss. Adakiko (talk) 08:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
Your recent editing history at Desmond Doss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adakiko (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 09:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Please unblock me
Did you not see the warnings on this page? 331dot (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I see 331dot got in ahead of me. Please describe what to do instead of edit warring. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Unsourced edits, eh? "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Funny, eh? Like drawing in library books? Thinking about it,I doubt you have the judgment to edit an encyclopedia. We need to see more subjects that you would edit about constructively. And some inkling that you understand sourcing requirements. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)