User talk:Anonymousajak

January 2014
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Samantha Ruth Prabhu because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samantha Ruth Prabhu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Samantha Ruth Prabhu was changed by Anonymousajak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969608 on 2014-01-12T13:30:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mahat Raghavendra, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mahat Raghavendra was changed by Anonymousajak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957961 on 2014-01-13T08:53:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)