User talk:Anoptimistix/Archive 1

Competence is required
Keep deleting my talk page messages. I will keep coming back with them until you try to improve your articles. Baarish (song) was badly formatted and poorly written. If you cannot improve, you could be banned per Competence is required guidelines. I've given you resources on how can improve the articles but you just delete my messages instead of replying back... which tells me that you don't care. --Jennica ✿ / talk 02:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm extremely sorry, but i do like to keep my talk pages clean so along with all I delete your messages too, but I have read WP:MOSMUSIC, I have wrote release, critical reception as well as personnel section in that article, can you please point my errors mam ,so that I can correct it, Baarish is a song no an album, so I don't think album formatting may apply, due to my real-life and our geographic time zones I may not be able to reply to your message instantly, but please leave me a reply ,I will reply to your message, whenever I login in wikipedia Or If possible can you please show me a perfectly formatted sample song article, it would be better to understand that way. Once again thankyou for taking your valuable time for reviewing my article Anoptimistix (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Janam Janam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janam Janam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Janam Janam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — usernamekiran (talk)  03:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Manual Music, Anoptimistix.

Unfortunately Innisfree987 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Hi, wanted to let you know that I've unreviewed this page, as it may not have adequate independent secondary sources to establish notability. I think it's worth another set of eyes having a look; it may be a candidate for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Innisfree987. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Flash album, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Innisfree987 (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for the successive messages--I was hoping to consolidate all into one and instead now you've got three. Apologies for the multiple pings.
 * The Flash album page I've unreviewed because it has a couple of serious problems; first, it's improperly named, and moving it to a proper name (in this case it would be Flash (Flash album)) is typically something reviewers should be on the lookout for. Second, it only has one source, so at minimum it needs to be flagged for lack of sources and possible failure to meet notability standards, but I think it's worth another editor having a look to see if it's a deletion candidate. If you do know of sources that clearly establish its notability, then by all means let me know, or of course just adding them is the simplest way to resolve such questions. Thanks. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archives/2017/July
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archives/2017/July. — usernamekiran (talk)  07:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Setting up the bot
Hi, this is the code for setting up the bot, all you have to do is to copy-paste it at the top of your page:



The above code will archive all the discussions that are three days old, and it will keep one discussion on the talkpage (it will not archive all the discussions/threads from talkpage. If you are not sure how to do it, I can do it for you if you say so. — usernamekiran (talk)  08:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks once again, thanks for your help I didn't knew that we could use twinkle on mobile, otherwise I had used it much before, Thanks once again Anoptimistix (talk) 09:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Singing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Umair Aj (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Falsely accused for vandalism ,promoting singers of specific nationalities on a page subject of global public interest Anoptimistix (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Listen Anoptimistix! You have no idea what edit war is. Please read three-revert rule. The 3RR says an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Moreover, You are removing the names of American singers from a specific page which are properly sourced. Your edits reflect biased approach on your part. That is why I warned you. See and .-Umair Aj (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. But the names and images of singers and their respected nationalities on the aricle like singing, which is a subject of public interest from the readers across the world doesn't seem fine. It looks promotion of singers. And claim of introducing "modern genres" by the respected singer seems complete false. Anoptimistix (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arijit Singh. Umair Aj (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Can you please show me the evidence, when did I vandalise Wikipedia ! Anoptimistix (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I got to know who is the leading founder of Wikipedia
So what inspired Larry Sanger to create Wikipedia? It is a bit stretching the facts according to Larry Sanger's NPOV to even call Jimbo the co-founder. Wales did not create Wikipedia and he was busy with other projects including Bomis. Wales was in the background and very hands-off. The only reason he is called the co-founder because he spoke to the media about Wikipedia. He was the public face of Wikipedia. Bomis paid for it not Wales. Bomis was founded by Jimmy Wales, Tim Shell, Michael Davis, and Tim Shell. They contributed to paying for Nupedia and Wikipedia. Larry Sanger is also the co-founder of Nupedia. The idea that anyone can edit Wikipedia was not even Wales' idea. Sanger took a blank canvas and created the most critical policies editors continue to cite. Jimmy Wales, Tim Shell, Michael Davis, and Tim Shell lost potential billions for not knowing how to profit from Wikipedia. Wales' idea was to make money from an online encyclopedia called Nupedia. We are here today because Bomis failed to turn a profit and because Sanger created and pushed the policies that made Wikipedia possible. Larry Sanger created Wikipedia. QuackGuru ( talk ) 21:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Sourced?
Can you please provide the correct source for the first sentence in this edit? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

apologise for late reply. But I have provided the citation, I got the information from a neutral and reliable source "Rediff", initially I have cited the source at the end of section later moved next to your said text. Thanks Anoptimistix (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAIV
Showing an interest in preventing deletion is not the same as showing an interest in expanding and improving the article. SpinningSpark 13:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Well that was a suggestion you have no obligation to do it. I kept that article as the consensus was for keeping it, Regards Anoptimistix (talk) 13:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that you didn't close the AfD on the false premise that I was going to improve it. I don't really have a big interest in programming articles, but there are plenty of editors out there who get much more enthusiastic. SpinningSpark 13:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)