User talk:Anoptimistix/Archive 2

Moving page without consensus
You could have at least asked for my opinion before arbitrarily moving the page. There isn't any room for confusion. There is no "Bengal assembly" anymore. West Bengal's one is officially the West Bengal Legislative Assembly.--Fez Cap 12 (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

This is the reason why I changed name Look here West Bengal Assembly has changed the state name and dropped west. In order to avoid confusion in future I changed the name. No intention of underestimating your contributions dear:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoptimistix (talk • contribs)

Page move
Hi there! Sorry to decline your request. You are doing amazing work so far, be sure to request again sometime in the future if you really feel the need to use the access. By the way, I just wanted to share my opinion on your recent page move. Instead of moving such page that is bound for deletion to draft space, it is much better to just tag it for deletion in this case. As for editor retention, I personally would provide a link to Notability (music) for that new editor, since the question was posed in the page title. I think this way is more helpful, what do you think? Anyway, keep up the good work! Alex ShihTalk 05:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects
I just want to let you know that redirects are a thing that exist in the MediaWiki software. I have redirected both Appellate side and Original side to their respective pages, and by default declined your move requests. Just keep in mind that if an article was created that copies another article, but the title can be considered suitable as a redirect, then the article should be redirected. If the title is not suitable, then it should be nominated for speedy deletion under A10 criteria. Requesting an uncontroversial move is not an option. Sky Warrior  20:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Suren Ghazaryan (judge)
Since you are adjusting the page, I'll go ahead and leave this here, rather then retag. I'd post here. It's still a dead end and orphan, so I assume you will fix those problems or add back the tags. Also there is no need for a dab since there is no other article titled Suren Ghazaryan, it should be moved back. John Roberts and the rest of the other current Supreme Court Justices don't have a dab, and unless there are multiple articles with same, the name of the judge is sufficient. This should be moved back.

note: I just received your comment on my talk page as I was writing this. I used PRODBLP because it had no sources at the time of tagging it. All blps need sources when they are made. The prodblp is there to allow 7 days for the sources to be added.  WikiVirus  C (talk) 03:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Quick follow up, this is still not quite there in terms of sourcing. The article says he is "retired judge from Supreme Arbitration court of the Constituent Western Armenia." That is taken from the second source here. The webpage describes itself as "The exiled government of the State of Western Armenia "Annunciation" news website aims to promote the civilized world claims to Western Armenia, to claim compensation for 1915-1923." Seems to be representative of the people Western Armenia, not the recognized state of Armenia. The other source here describes him as "Armenian District Court Judge Suren Ghazaryan". So in terms of notability at the moment he seems be a former district judge of an established country, which doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN, which wants international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office. More sources will be needed to pass WP:GNG.  WikiVirus  C (talk) 03:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Ok Ok I didn't knew there were disputes between Western Armenia and "recognised" Armenia as I am not from that region. I notified you to inform about removal of Proposed deletion. So that if you have any objection you are free to revert those changes. While patrolling I just gave the verification of the person much importance. Anoptimistix  Let's Talk  05:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)