User talk:Another 5000 Years

Clarification in BKWSU case
Note to admins,

I am showing here clearly and precisely,


 * a) how the Brahma Kumari adherent has gamed the system ... knowingly constructing a bogus railroading ... in a persistent attempt to block me from his religion's topic pages.
 * b) why I was not guilty of the initial sockpuppet charge made of me.

It all hangs on the first bogus sockpuppet accusation made by, (here; Suspected_sock_puppets/Lwachowski) and a user name block on the basis of some obscure policy ... NOT misconduct.


 * i) I edited at Lwachowski but lost the password for it.
 * ii) My first edits as AWachowski were CLEARLY to request name change/disclose previous user/redirect to previous user page.
 * iii) Bksimonb accuses, BOTH accounts are NAME BLOCKED.
 * iv) I was forced to establish a new account ... and at no time did accounts coincide.
 * vi) BK Simon B creates KNOWINGLY bogus sockpuppet report based on a FALSE conflagration of events ... and his misunderstanding of the term indef blocked.
 * vii) Repeat ad nauseum to date. All consequent accusation have been based on these first false ones.

Here you have the dates and events laid out clearly.


 * Precisely WHY Brahma Kumari adherent Simon B is so persistent in these accusations?

My suggestion is that it relates to a failed Chilling Effects legal action he and other adherents colluded in on behalf of the Brahma Kumari leadership attempting to silence independent and open discussion about his religion just as he is trying to do on the Wikipedia. --Another 5000 Years (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence
__NOINDEX__