User talk:Another Believer/Archive 28

Question
Your recent revert of my edits seem to contradict the banner on the top of Category:Mass shootings in the United States which states "all mass shootings in the United States should be included in this category". Your edit defeats the purpose of this banner. I was adding this to a few pages that didn't include said category. However, a few pages do include the parent category and a subcategory for example: Aurora, Illinois shooting contains the categories Category:Mass shootings in Illinois as well as Category:Mass shootings in the United States. Shouldn't all pages be consistently categorized? Tinton5 (talk) 00:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hmm, I'm not sure. I don't see the point in having entries in the parent as well as subcategories, but I guess I won't revert if you feel the parent category needs to be added back? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello I was wondering if you had any tips for a new editor thanks EHTROITDE (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hey, if you're interested in Oregon-related articles, I'd recommend adding WikiProject Oregon to your watchlist. Lots of great editors there who can answer questions you might have. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Yvie
Before that Oddly didn’t embrace all the opportunities being a drag artist offered as he was just a “skinny, black, gay guy,” Oddly said.[3] Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , I'm not sure why you're posting this on my talk page. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You asked if there was a source for Yvie Oddly’s being gay. When I added the category the system didn’t allow me to add a comment so I posted here. Gleeanon409 (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for clarifying. I'll make sure the category has been added back. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank You for Your Hard Work!

 * Thank you for the recognition. I love starting and following the development of current events articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Question on Revert
You reverted an edit I made to the ZoomCare article and stated that the revert set it back to the sourced version, but the previous edit has no source. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ZoomCare&oldid=prev&diff=899198987&diffmode=source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tas50 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, I changed back to 37, but kept 2018 per the sourced introduction. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Women's March on Portland
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Women's March on Portland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Reversing Roe
Hi, there. I've created the article for the film Reversing Roe, but as you "created" it first as a redirect, it doesn't appear on my list of pages created. Is there anything I can do to make it appear on my list? Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 00:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , If I'm being honest, I'm not sure. For future reference, when I'm looking to override a redirect, I usually write my article in the draft space (such as Draft:Reversing Roe) and then submit a request to have the page moved into the main space at Requested moves. I don't know if Requests for history merge is a place for help. Of course, you're welcome to simply claim credit, but I understand if you want the article history to reflect your work. I often just expand articles from redirects, just depends on the situation. There may be a solution but I don't know off hand. Perhaps a talk page stalker can point you in the right direction. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I have created the draft on my draft space before even realizing the redirect. I'll try the Requests for history merge. Thanks for your help.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Women's March on Portland
The article Women's March on Portland you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Women's March on Portland for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, I've replied in all section and am willing to revisit as needed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Holocene (Portland, Oregon) copyedit

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Women's March on Portland
The article Women's March on Portland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Women's March on Portland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 22:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
 * An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
 * An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news
 * The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion.  You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
 * Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution!  The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous
 * The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
 * The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Florence and the Machine listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of songs recorded by Florence and the Machine. Since you had some involvement with the List of songs recorded by Florence and the Machine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Franz Engelsman
Hi. Are you able to find Franz Engelsman's death date please?Zigzig20s (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Maybe ask WikiProject Biographies? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Desmond Napoles
I improved this article mainly in late May. I’m not sure if it helps for the Wiki Loves Pride. Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , You've made some improvements in June as well, and I'll probably make a few now as well. I invite you to add this to the Wiki Loves Pride list! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, I went ahead and added, since I made some minor changes and added the banner to the talk page as well. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You got there first! No problem.
 * Would you do me a favor and look at Desmond’s entry at ? As far as I can tell he is both 1. The most famous drag kid in the world and 2. The youngest professional drag queen in the world but I’m getting like no sources feedback that’s really definitive or even about the content I’d like to add. Am I at the right place? Should I start over that a fourth source was found? I don’t know what to do. Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2019
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 01:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Membership renewal


You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.

Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lung On Street for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lung On Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lung On Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nova Crystallis  (Talk)  18:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey
Did you see my question on the talk page for Robert E. Lee on Traveller?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 04:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
 * , Yes, but sorry I don't deal with DYK any longer. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Parish of Jesús María and Our Lady of Mercy
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 14
Newsletter • June 2019

Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.

There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:
 * A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
 * We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!

Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:
 * Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
 * WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)

Until next time,

-— Isarra ༆ 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Prom
I’m sorry but it is way too early to have that article in the mainspace. That is why I created it in draftspace. WP:NFF clearly defines filming as needing to be underway in order to exist or at least have a very detailed production history, which it does not. Rusted AutoParts 21:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of The Prom (2020 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Prom (2020 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Prom (2020 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusted AutoParts 22:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

There is no mention of Super Moon at Dirty Heads
Hi. I see you created redirects for Dirty Heads' upcoming album Super Moon, probably presuming there was content at the band's article about it. There isn't. Please make sure there is a mention at the article you're pointing a redirect to before creating said redirect, or add it there after. Your redirects have been nominated for deletion enough times for you to probably know this, and I believe I've asked you to do this before. Thanks.  Ss  112   06:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Bad Karma (Miley Cyrus song) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad Karma (Miley Cyrus song). Since you had some involvement with the Bad Karma (Miley Cyrus song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. NØ 09:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: Relisted. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • 1 • Flyguy649 • 2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
 * 1 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
 * 2 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • WJBscribe • Wizardman

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg MSGJ • TheDJ

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD • GB fan

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
 * In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
 * A request for comment seeks to determine whether Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous
 * In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop . This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * 🇳🇫 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
 * Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
 * SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Reading Kafka
Thank you for watching over Franz Kafka and improving. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure thing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Honey Davenport
I saw that the Honey Davenport article finally underwent its CE. I have to say, I am pretty disappointed: the copy edit introduced a number of unambiguous grammatical errors and included many other changes that, in my opinion, were disimprovements to the flow and structure of the prose. At least one other edit Wikilinked a magazine in the refs that was already linked in its first appearance in the published version of the article (which was not its first appearance in the markup).

Some of the changes struck me as true improvements or were pretty neutral, so I left those alone. I had to restore much of the article from its pre-CE version, though. Do you think this will present a problem? Normally in a case like this, I'd open a discussion with the editor who did the CE and comment on each change in detail. However, I'm traveling and pressed for time IRL, so initiating what could be a long talk isn't especially feasible for me at the moment. If someone attempts to revert my most recent changes, I will probably have to do it anyway, but this is a headache I hope very much to avoid. What did you think of this CE? I noticed you also restored at least one sentence from the pre-CE version. Armadillopteryxtalk 14:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Nope, don't worry. Sometimes I revert edits made via GOCE review as well. For me, getting GOCE review is generally helpful, and most of the time quite constructive. But, sometimes I disagree and undo some changes, and this has never been a problem with reviewing editors or the Good article review. By all means, please edit the article as you see fit. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Got it—thanks! Shall I go ahead and nominate it for GA? Armadillopteryxtalk 20:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Yeah, go for it! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks! Armadillopteryxtalk 20:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Rainbow flag (LGBT movement)
I made some improvements and added content to the article, but I’m not sure if it qualifies as a WikiPride candidate. Could you please take a look? Gleeanon409 (talk) 16:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Sure, the campaign generally runs during the month of June, but some people continue updating the Results page outside June. I've gone ahead and added the banner and updated the Results page on your behalf. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for checking! BTW, I read that the WikiPride went from June to October. I’m hoping that’s the case as I’ve got a backlog now of articles I want to write that are within the LGBTQ umbrella. I figured I had until 1st November, but are we already past the deadline? Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Historically, the campaign has run during June, but Wiki Loves Pride is really about encouraging editors to create and improve LGBT-related content whenever. If you want to continue adding Template:Wiki Loves Pride 2019 to talk pages and updating Wiki Loves Pride/2019/Results with your work, by all means, please do! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Wonderful! Thank you again. Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

A belated apology
It's been a while, but I'd like to apologize for flaking on you and not reviewing the notability of the World Famous Kenton Club draft as I said I would. I found the notability of the draft rather tricky tricky to evaluate, and I kept putting it off so I could give you a thorough review. The perfect ended up being the enemy of the good, however, and I never got around to writing down my thoughts. I'm sorry about this. I just want to follow up with you so you know: don't hesitate to ping me if you need a second opinion on something again! Hopefully I'll be able to provide some feedback in a more timely manner next time ;) – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hey, no problem at all! I was mostly just pinging as a courtesy, since I had said I would. The editor who I was conflicting with has been banned from interacting with me, and I've already nominated two articles they attempted to delete for Good article status. Sorry you got pulled into that mess. I've been enjoying some of your other contributions related to Portland and Oregon. Keep up the great work! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! After having edited here for some time, it feels good to finally get some new articles into mainspace. I saw the Graywalls thread at ANI. I thought about chiming in, but I dislike drama and just felt too heated at the time to contribute constructively. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2019
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 23:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Feminists: What Were They Thinking? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feminists: What Were They Thinking? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminists: What Were They Thinking? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * sigh. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 34, May – June 2019  French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
 * Partnerships
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Stubs on Portland parks
Hello again! Are you sure articles like Northgate Park and University Park (Portland, Oregon) pass GNG? Why have you chosen to create articles on these parks rather than any of the other non-bluelinked parks at List of parks in Portland, Oregon? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , I create stubs for park articles often, mostly as I visit them in chunks and connect entries to Commons, Wikidata, etc. I'd love to see stubs for more of the parks mentioned in the list and will continue to work on them as possible. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Frankly, I don't think creating these articles is a good idea. Taking Northgate Park as an example, I can find tangential mentions like this and this but no significant coverage. If the above articles were taken to AfD, you'd need to have some sort of IAR rationale for keeping them. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

For the record, I think an IAR rationale can be perfectly legitimate. I'm skeptical that some Portland neighborhoods like Crestwood, Portland, Oregon or Sunderland, Portland, Oregon pass GNG, for instance, but there are still encyclopedic reasons to have these articles. I should also clarify that I don't think there's anything particularly bad about these parks articles (they're accurate and verifiable); I just think it's important for policy to be applied consistently, regardless of whether an article creator is a newbie or autopatrolled. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , I understand, and some parks will have received more coverage than others (not to mention, there may be better coverage of Portland's parks compared to other metro areas). If you poke around Category:Parks in Portland, Oregon, you'll see there are some nice entries for even some of the city's minor parks. Many of them were established as protected areas decades ago and there may be some helpful PP&R sources and I'd be searching the Oregonian archives as well. Also worth keeping in mind, some parks may have public art, host events, have community centers, etc, so there may be more than expected or seen at a glance. Personally, I like getting the ball rolling, and I think there are bigger concerns than purging articles about parks. But you can always note your concerns their respective talk pages. BTW, thanks for fixing the caption on the Mock's Bottom article. --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 20:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Kylie and Garibay (EP)
Hey there! I'm in the process of copy editing Kylie and Garibay (EP) and already finished copy editing the first half of the article. I've run into some IRL issues, so I will finish the other half later (hopefully by end of day today).

I have a question regarding the second sentence of the article:

It was released on 11 September 2015 by Parlophone and Warner Bros. Records, and serves as a sequel to their first collaboration, Sleepwalker (2014).

If my intuition is correct, "their" is supposed to refer to Kylie and Garibay. However, grammatically, "their" here refers to Parlaphone and Warner Bros. Records. Furthermore, I noticed that the tenses in this sentence are inconsistent (i.e. "was" and "serves") and that the previous sentence uses present tense. Given these combined reasons, I moved the second half of the sentence to be a part of the first one. (Just explaining my rationale here. It was an edit made in good faith.)

In your edit you noted that you want to "say date of release before the date of their previous release". I'm perfectly okay with this. However, as a copy editor, I want to make sure it flows well grammatically and stylistically. Currently, "their" is ambiguous, the tenses are inconsistent, and the second clause should either be a phrase without the comma or an independent clause. What do you think of the following variations to this sentence?

It was released on 11 September 2015 by Parlophone and Warner Bros. Records, and it served as a sequel to Kylie and Garibay's first collaboration, Sleepwalker (2014).

It was released on 11 September 2015 by Parlophone and Warner Bros. Records and served as a sequel to Kylie and Garibay's first collaboration, Sleepwalker (2014).

Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. Thanks. —Bobbychan193 (talk) 21:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the note. I like the second option above. Looking forward to the rest of your review. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Noted. Thanks! —Bobbychan193 (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Help improving the Fund for the Public Interest page
Hello Another Believer. My name is Elizabeth and I do work for several nonprofits, including Environment America and the Fund for the Public Interest. I want to make some improvements to the Fund for the Public Interest page, but since I am in a conflict of interest when doing so, I wonder if you have time to help me in the next few weeks? If so, how would you like to me to proceed? I can share my proposed edits with you. CleanWater17 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:18, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Possibly, but your best bet is to post suggested updates/improvements to the article's talk page. There's also the request edit template if you want to throw your requests into a queue for editors familiar with this process to review. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick response. I've now read about the request edit template and have a question. The guidelines say to post proposed changes on the talk page and obtain consensus before using the edit request template. I assume this means reach consensus with other people who have edited the page. The page I'd like to edit, however, doesn't have many active editors. How long should I wait for a discussion and consensus on the page before using the edit request template? CleanWater17 (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hmm, I see people use this template often when requesting straightforward requests, such as fixing inaccuracies, adding updates, etc, without seeking consensus first. However, if you're planning to propose major overhauls, you may want to reach out to specific editors who are willing to review proposed language and sourcing in detail. I've noticed those who reply to the request edit template often prefer smaller changes. Note: Using the request edit template is not required, but I wanted to make this option known. Your best bet is to find interested editors or ask for help at select WikiProjects. Starting with an outline of your proposed changes on the article's talk page is the best start, so you can at least see if any page watchers reply in any way before going out of the way for assistance. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Minister for Loneliness


Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Minister for Loneliness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Robert E. Lee on Traveller
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Robert E. Lee on Traveller has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Naming statue articles
Ther is a lot of conversation going on about the naming of statues. I have avoided bringing this into the conversation, but perhaps we could chat about it? I think at least they should all have the sculpture's name instead of the "(sculpture)" that a few of them have. But should they all be "Statue of........." ? Carptrash (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Funny you mention, User:Ham II is working on this in their draft space: User:Ham II/Sandpit G. Amidst all the naming discussions, we still need to decide about what to do when there are multiples of the same statue. Many of the statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection have duplicates installed at state capitol buildings, or elsewhere. Not all, but some. TBD: Do we go with "Statue of XXX", "Statues of XXX", or even have separate articles if there's enough content about the works in their respective locations? So much to figure out, but I'm looking forward to setting some standards so we can be more consistent moving forward. Glad you see the NSHC on your mind as well. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Guy Walks Into a Bar...
There is an ellipsis in the title. I don't know what you linked your redirect Guy Walks into a Bar (album) on Mini Mansions for, whether you were intending to start the article or have somebody do it for you by linking a redirect you created, but I've started the article at the correct place (Guy Walks Into a Bar..., with ellipsis intact) to dissuade others from making it elsewhere. If you intend to contribute to the topic, please do so there. Thank you.  Ss  112   04:25, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I was just creating redirects based on other possible search terms. I'm not sure an ellipsis serves as a disambiguation, and I thought "into" should be lower case, but I don't feel strongly about either. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Johnuniq • Kosack • Valereee
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem • Ched • Gadfium • Jonathunder • Nick • Yelyos
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bald Zebra • Beetstra • Doug Bell • Journalist • Ruud Koot • Splash • Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Dinoguy1000

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg RickinBaltimore

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Beeblebrox
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg RickinBaltimore

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, the page Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
 * A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.

Arbitration
 * Editors may now use the template Ds/aware to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.

Miscellaneous
 * Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
 * The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing  here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist. Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey!
Hey there! I see your helping me out with the Game of Thrones episodes. Cheers. The Optimistic One (talk) 03:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Some of them, yes. Good luck with these noms! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I've reverted nearly all my nominations. Could you help me with "The Dragon and the Wolf"? The Optimistic One (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2019
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Photos of art
Hi Another Believer. Please provide a license for your photos of artwork. You may use, replacing PD-self with the compatible free license of your choice. Thanks. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I received a bot notification below wth specific links, which I've tried to address (hopefully correctly). Not sure why this isn't taken care of during the upload process. I didn't think I overlooked any fields. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've added yes and yes and removed the deletion notices. In upload wizard step 3: Choosing This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use then depiction of a copyrighted three-dimensional work or building should allow you to fill in the license for the photograph in the box after The author of the image has released the photographic work under a free license, or it is in the public domain. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks so much for your help. I'll pay closer attention next time. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Air Force Monument by Leonard McMurry, Oklahoma City.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Air Force Monument by Leonard McMurry, Oklahoma City.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

Also:
 * File:Falling Water by Lin Emery, Oklahoma City.jpg
 * File:Galaxy by Alexander Liberman, Oklahoma City.jpg
 * File:Investigation, Analysis and Publication - Oklahoma City.jpg
 * File:Statue of Jim Thorpe, Oklahoma City.jpg
 * File:Statue of Liberty replica (Oklahoma City), 2019.jpg
 * File:Statue of Stanley Draper, Oklahoma City.jpg
 * File:The Runners by Rich Muno and Bruce L. Bockus, Oklahoma City.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

"I Pour Down" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect I Pour Down. Since you had some involvement with the I Pour Down redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 09:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Sydney Ember
then nominate for deletion

I did. What, exactly. was unclear about the phrase "proposal for deletion"? --Calton &#124; Talk 22:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I meant AfD. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Woodstock 50

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  01:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Nice userpage!

 * Hey, thanks! Your page looks great, and no doubt I took the design template from someone else. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Well we both have good taste then. lol — Hun<b style="color:#C0C0C0">ter</b> <b style="color:#595454">Ka</b><b style="color:#595454">hn</b> 17:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi! Sorry to bother you. I'm currently nominating an article of mine for GA status; after some observations, I've found that you're a frequent GA promoter, and a really active editor on Wikipedia. If you have time, could you review the article if nobody has done it yet? (I'm messaging several other users, just in case) If you decline due to various reasons, could you recommend another potential user to review it? Thank you in advance. Dhio-270599 08:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hello! Sorry, you're right I do request Good article reviews often but I do not complete reviews myself. I usually just wait for a volunteer to pick up my nominations, which can take several months sometimes. Good luck! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the good wishes. :) Dhio-270599 06:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Cavenaugh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Cavenaugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin Cavenaugh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

A question about "park" articles
Hi Another Believer,

I mentioned in a previous post that I read the articles that appear on the 50,000 challenge list. I know that you write articles on statues, local landmarks, history, people and parks of Portland, along with those really great articles (I'm a big fan), like the 'Women's March', 'March for our Lives', etc. I am living in a new town, Oak Park, Illinois, and its a town with interesting history and landmarks, and few wikipedia articles. I have a few ideas — Hemingway's birthplace, I'm working on that now. The town has many lovely parks, statues, interesting Mob history, other landmarks, etc.. There are also neighborhoods outside Oak Park that have interesting civil rights history--riots, marches, murders, etc.

I would like to begin with articles on local parks, but am concerned that the articles will be will not be considered "notable" and be deleted eventually. Do you have any problems with notability with the park articles you have written in the past? thanks MauraWen (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for reaching out. I've been following some of your work as well. Hard to say without knowing more about the specific topics you're considering, but I would certainly start with the most notable, and perhaps start with notable neighborhoods/areas and landmarks before tackling some of the smaller parks. I don't know if this is unique to Portland or not, but many of the parks here were acquired many decades ago and host events, community centers, public art, etc. Parks and recreation are very much part of the culture here, so there may be more coverage of local parks here than in some other parts of the U.S. You might poke around Category:Parks in Portland, Oregon to do some quick article assessments. To answer your question, I've not had a big problem with park articles getting deleted, but I certainly don't want to suggest most public parks are notable. But, be bold!, and see if you can get the ball rolling on some notable local landmarks and other sites. Also, consider starting List of parks in Oak Park, Illinois and List of public art in Oak Park, Illinois, if those help as starting places. I wish you luck and look forward to your contributions! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I will check out the Portland Parks Category and an Oak Park list of public art and parks is a great idea! MauraWen (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Billie Eilish's awards and nominations
Please read WP:SPLIT. This is in no way long enough to be split out yet. If you edit war over it, as you have done in the past, I will report this to an admin, so please do not do so. I don't know how you think that tiny not-even-a-decent-sized article was worth moving into a draft to claim as your own. If you were starting an article from scratch with content you had written originally and had worked on in a draft, that would be understandable. But copying content that you didn't even write from another article into a draft just to have moved it over a redirect another user made is not right. You basically didn't even do anything to it. You want article creation credit for moving a section that you didn't even have anything to do with. Ridiculous. Even admins acknowledge that when they are moving content they didn't originate, they don't need to erase redirects. I'll be asking an admin about this practice.  Ss  112   09:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to get so riled up. I don't care about creation "credit" (even though you seem to think that's my primary motivation), but I do care about attribution, hence why I added the split template on both talk pages. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Floquenbeam • Lectonar
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news
 * Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
 * The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration
 * A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Miscellaneous
 * A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Midland–Odessa shooting
Please could you look at this edit because it produced a template error. I can't fix this because it is too technical for me. Thanks.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 08:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , I have no idea. I was just using the "fix dead links" tool accessible after clicking on the "View history" tab. Sorry, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The help for this template's parameters are too complicated for a simple soul like me. Looks like a job for WP:TECHPUMP.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 16:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, sorry for any errors introduced on my part. I just assume the tool is working correctly when I use. I see lots of bots doing citation work in my watchlist lately so hard to follow which are fixes vs. other tasks. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The edit linked above added the citation parameter alive to multiple citations. The problem is that  is not a valid value for url-status. Valid values include   and  . – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks. I saw your name a lot in my watchlist, fixing this issue. I'm not sure how to help, so I'm going to collapse this section for now. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Karbala stampede
 Spencer T• C 04:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2019
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 07:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Enter the Anime
valereee (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Salute to America
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Salute to America has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GA nomination.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

"Nina Chop" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nina Chop. Since you had some involvement with the Nina Chop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 16:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the heads up. I've replied within the redirect discussion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Kevin Cavenaugh moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kevin Cavenaugh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Rock Album – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Human Access Project
Howdy another believer - we corresponded 2-3 years ago on my edits to Poet’s Beach I think. Thanks for adding The Big Float and Audrey McCall Beach.

I seem to remember you may have said I could try drafting up something for Human Access Project with citations that you might look at? Now that there are three articles with reference to Human Access Project it seemed like maybe it’s time to add HAP.

I was not sure how to communicate with you so I apologize if this is not the best way.

I also could potentially add content with citations to TBF and AMB.

Also totally fine if you would rather I didn’t. Thanks again for building out TBF, AMB and Poets. Gangstaoflove (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hello again, thanks for the note. I'd suggest attempting to draft content at Draft:Human Access Project. You can click on the red link to create the new page, where you can start adding neutral text about the project, as well as citations. This will just be a draft page, until we're ready to move the entry into main space. Is this something you'd be interested in trying? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC) I've started something at Human Access Project, which remains a work in progress. --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 14:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Don't request drafts be accepted at RM/TR
A new week, another attempt by you to get a redirect of mine deleted for a stub article you've made in draftspace. I'm not surprised. Some admins and users will tell you drafts should be tagged with an AfC template if you want to start them as a draft. Could you imagine if every user who started a draft listed the article at RM/TR? It would be clogged and that's not what it's for. You know this. In future, please ask an admin directly.  Ss  112   19:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , No need to leave this message, I did nothing wrong. I'm not specifically targeting your work, so please spare the condescending edit summaries and talk page lectures. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No. You appear not to know RM/TR is not the place to accept drafts.  Ss  112   19:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , I'm not asking for a draft article to be accepted. I'm asking to have my draft taken live over a redirect. Nothing wrong with that, and I don't understand why you care about your redirects (talk about minimal effort) getting overridden with an article. There are bigger things to worry about... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Lmao. You talk about "minimal effort" when you create tonnes of redirects yourself and you've even taken issue when I G6ed one of your annoying redirects to have an article of mine overwrite it. Besides, I create more articles than you do and if I was going to create an article, I'd certainly do more than you did on half the things you try to overwrite my redirects with. Do more, be better.  Ss  112   19:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , OK, whatever. Happy editing. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Miss'd America
Hi! Would you be willing to give me some feedback on Miss'd America, an article I've just created? It's the first non-biographical article I've written, and I'd appreciate thoughts from a second pair of eyes. I started the talk page but am not confident assessing its class/importance in the WikiProjects I've placed it in. Thanks if you can, and no worries if you can't! Armadillopteryxtalk 08:16, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Great work! Thanks for creating this new article. I went with C-class for now, but B-class might actually be more appropriate. I hope you'll consider a GOCE review and consider a Good article nomination for this one! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments and for assessing the article! Since I've just finished writing and will probably want to make more changes in the coming days, I'll hold off on nominating it for GA just yet. I also assume there will be more news coverage of the pageant in the near future, since this year's edition of the contest has just concluded. I'd like to incorporate that if/when it comes out. I'll nominate it after that :-) Armadillopteryxtalk 21:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Wonderful, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:11, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, one other thing: while researching this article, I came across this source, which states Mimi Imfurst's legal name as Braden Maurer-Burns. In the Mimi Imfurst Wikipedia article, though, her legal name is recorded as Braden Chapman. There's no source for that in the article, as far as I can tell, though a quick Google search does produce more results supporting "Braden Chapman" than "Braden Maurer-Burns". There are plenty of sources for both, however. It appears that she may have undergone a name change or something, but how should we source and handle the name in the Mimi Imfurst article? Picking a random source for one name of the other doesn't seem like the best way to do it, though I couldn't find any source that explicitly mentions both names or a name change. Armadillopteryxtalk 22:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , I'd recommend adding both, each with their own inline citations, until sources clarify. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Immortan Joe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Immortan_Joe check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Immortan_Joe?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of No Vacancy Lounge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article No Vacancy Lounge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 22:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I've addressed your concerns, and happy to revisit as needed. If you're interested, I've also nominated Holocene (Portland, Oregon) (a similar article) for GA status. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of No Vacancy Lounge
The article No Vacancy Lounge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:No Vacancy Lounge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 35, July – August 2019 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
 * Wikimania
 * We're building something great, but..
 * Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
 * A Wikibrarian's story
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Holocene (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Holocene (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15
Newsletter • September 2019

A final update, for now:

The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.

Regards,

-— Isarra ༆ 19:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

"Dundee"
Hey, do you know how to get the parenthetical "Succession" in the article title to present italicized? — Mainly 18:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , ✅ See top of markup. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! — Mainly 18:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No prob! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)