User talk:Another Believer/Archive 32

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Red Phoenix
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Euryalus • SQL
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Jujutacular • Monty845 • Rettetast • Madchester

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg GB fan
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Keegan • Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news
 * There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
 * Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
 * Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
 * There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Spoopy
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the GOCE of the article Spoopy has been completed.

There were only very minor tweaks made to it. Congratulations on its GA status.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Superbloom (disambiguation)
Hello Another Believer,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Superbloom (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Alphabetizing
Question—how are these being alphabetized? I just added Kameron alphabetized by first name as consensus seemed to be for drag queens, but I noticed that Derrick Barry, for example, seems to be alphabetized by her last name (and Marcelino Sambé, who isn't a drag queen, is alphabetized by first name). There are a few more cases like that, too. Obviously not a big thing, but just wondering. Armadillopteryxtalk 16:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , People add to the list differently. I try to list people by last name, with exceptions for drag queens (who are generally sorted by first name). Some people just add to the top of the list. A bit of cleanup is probably needed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Give Up the Ghost album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Give Up the Ghost album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Why did you upload a different version of this image? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Haus Laboratories
Hello, I wondered if you wouldn't mind to take a look and help me to expand this draft. Thanks Gaga Nutella talk 00:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , I went ahead and moved the article into main space. The community can decide its fate. Thanks and good luck! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Americans Against Insecure Billionaires with Tiny Hands


Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Americans Against Insecure Billionaires with Tiny Hands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations on being quoted in a Washington Post article. You've done a lot of excellent work! &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 17:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! I had assumed I was just being interviewed for background info so I was pleasantly surprised! Happy editing, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
If you can help, regards.. Titodutta (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes I knew it was definitely not your fault. For 2 reasons I posted on the VP directly a) other people are also using the script, and b) to keep it "non-personal", that's why did not mention you directly in the post. If the script is triggering email and other notification, that's bad. If you want to test please archive "Sumit Arora" section here User talk:Titodutta. I'll let you know if I get an email/notification. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 22:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep, unfortunately. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 22:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


 * This is super weird, actually. I've never previously gotten a ping notification when a thread I was tagged in got archived (even if the archiver also had a signature in the discussion), but this week it's happened two or three times already (including just now at Talk:Christmas Queens 3/Archive 1 and four days ago at Talk:Kameron Michaels/Archive 1). Do we know if there's been a change in the way pings are coded? Previously a new signature had to be added as four tildes in order for anyone tagged in the post to be notified; in fact, Template:Ping fix explains: The notifications system only informs a user when you link their username in the same saved edit as you successfully sign your post. A ping cannot be fixed in a later edit by adding your signature or fixing a botched username. I wonder what's going on. Armadillo  pteryx  16:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Something must have changed. Making you aware of this comment for additional context. --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 16:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2020
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

The West Christmas Ever copyedit

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Statue of Hans Christian Heg
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Keep up the good work. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 22:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hey, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Wandering Rocks
Hi Another Believer - I notice you've reversed a page move I did for Wandering Rocks (sculpture). Any reason why you think Wandering Rocks (AP) is a better name? There's nothing in the article which mentions what AP refers to, so unless people already know something about the sculpture that the article doesn't say, it's not an easy title to search for. Grutness... wha?   04:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , I understand, but there are multiple sculptures called "Wandering Rocks", hence why I turned the page into a disambiguation page. This source confirms Edition AP. I'm open to moving the page, if needed, but not to "Wandering Rocks (sculpture)". --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Would Wandering Rocks (Seattle sculpture) work? Grutness... wha?   04:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Maybe? I'd recommend submitting a move request so other editors can weigh in. Or, try asking at WikiProject Sculpture about possible naming conventions? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * AP usually means Artist's proof. That's likely the case here. There are 5 editions, 1–5 and one artist's proof. Vexations (talk) 21:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

GOCE

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Contemporary Jazz Album – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Dis' sayin'
You think looks less silly than Carry on. --Brogo13 (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * a bullet (think bullethole)
 * 1) this?

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you for the barnstar! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome!

"Percentage (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Percentage (film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

"Los Angeles Real Estate" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Los Angeles Real Estate. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

"Don't Poke the Bear" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Don&. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 2pou (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 30 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #4
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool


The Reply tool  has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.


 * More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They  posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
 * Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
 * Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة.  ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

 * The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
 * Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily . Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected.  Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures.  If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were


 * Free Hong Kong flag.svg Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
 * 🇮🇩HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were, , and. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.


 * wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
 * win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
 * wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
 * wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
 * wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Eddie891
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg SQL

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
 * A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
 * A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

Arbitration
 * A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
 * An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Badlands (Live at Webster Hall)
I would be happy if you could expand the entry Badlands (Live at Webster Hall) I do not know the English Wikipedia I am from the Israeli Wikipedia so it is difficult for me. King G.A (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have other articles on my plate right now but I'll see what I can do and continue to watch the page as other editors contribute. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you can at least the opening of the album create just normal. King G.A (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 19:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1 has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Disloyal
Why did you move the existing stub article into draftspace so that you could restart the article? Why didn't you build on the existing article? We should WP:PRESERVE. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I didn't move the stub into draft space. I simply created Disloyal: A Memoir not knowing someone else had already moved Disloyal into draft space (which I don't think was necessary). --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah my mistake. I thought that seemed like an odd thing for you to do. I see now who did it. Wouldn't it be better to move the draft back to preserve the article history? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't think preserving the draft history is required in this case since the stubs were created independently, but if the author of the original stub feels inclined to request a histmerge, that's their choice. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

PRODs
Being unsourced is not, in itself, a valid reason for speedy deletion. In order to justify deletion, there has to have been "thorough attempts to find reliable sources". Merely being unsourced, even for a long time, is not evidence that "thorough attempts" have been made to find sources. - dcljr (talk) 17:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Ok, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Just a suggestion
You might want to look at the school article you prodded yesterday that was deprodded for a spurious reason. A vulture kinda picked it over. AfD, anyone? John from Idegon (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Yeah, User:Dcljr seems to think my PRODs were inappropriate... I don't really think these pages are worth saving but I'll let the community sort this out. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I assume you mean Children's Paradise School? Please note that the dePRODding was not spurious: the original PROD was based on an invented criterion. (In fact, dePRODs cannot be spurious, as they can be done for literally any reason.) Anyway, I have no opinions about what ultimately happens to the article, as long as it's done within our guidelines. - dcljr (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted. If you're some how pround of yourself for wasting a week of other people in the projects time because you don't know what notability means, you feel good about that. Bravo. You've made grand improvements. You made deleting a pile of crap involve numerous other editors and an extra weeks time. As I said, Bravo. Be proud of yourself. John from Idegon (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't have happend if PROD hadn't been misused. - dcljr (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * PROD wasn't misused. There's a difference between WP:Proposed deletion and WP:Speedy deletion which you cited in the removal and it's quite astonishing someone who's been around as long as you doesn't know it. The Children's Paradise School indeed meets WP:DEL-REASON #6 and #7, so the PROD was very well applied, but now you're wasting people's time at AFD on non-notable articles. Reywas92Talk 05:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Heh… Somehow I missed the words "do not" in the statement, "is meant for uncomplicated deletion proposals that do not meet the strict criteria for speedy deletion" at WP:PROD. My bad. I was under the impression that PROD was somehow an alternative method of getting something speedily deleted. (This was the first time the process had come to my attention, AFAIR. I was already well aware of deletion discussions and speedy deletion through Db, etc.) In any case, I did look at WP:DEL-REASON, as well, before I did anything. (In other words, just to be clear: I still would have contested the PRODs, even if I had only relied on DEL-REASON and not brought speedy deletion into this at all.) As for "#6 and #7", I direct you to the phrases "cannot possibly" and "thorough attempts" in those reasons. There was no indication in any of the PRODs that reliable sources were actually searched for and not found, or that such sources "could not possibly" exist, merely that the articles had lain there unsourced for a long time. I still say, that in itself is not a sufficient reason for deletion, unless attempts have actually been made to find RSs — in which case, just say that in the PRODs. (And, BTW, John from Idegon brought up "notability" above, which has also been cited in subsequent edits to many of the pages in question by Another Believer: "notability" wasn't mentioned in the PRODs, either. If you don't want things like this happening in the future, just properly justify the PRODs in the first place.) Literally the only reason I got involved at all was that the articles' long-term unsourced status was the only justification given; I objected to that as a justification for deletion, so I contested the PRODs, which was entirely consistent with WP:CONTESTED. If that bothers you, well, I don't know what to tell you. You will be happy to know that I had not planned on being involved in any other PROD activities well before this particular discussion was initiated. So, we need not ever encounter each other again. Bye. - dcljr (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Dual Barnstars

 * Thanks for both of these! Still hoping to see the AstroWorld article promoted to Good status at some point. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Blazing Wheels and Barking Trucks
Hello, saw that you were considering merging this. I found some other sources for this comp, which seems to have been the most notable of the 7 or 8. Just wanted to ask your opinion first, thanks. Caro7200 (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Sure, if you can please add those sources or at least share them on the article's talk page, that'd be very helpful. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Public art in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Thanks. :) Ber31 (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Sure thing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 40, July – August 2020 
 * New partnerships
 * Al Manhal
 * Ancestry
 * RILM
 * #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
 * AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 41
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 41, September – October 2020 
 * New partnership: Taxmann
 * WikiCite
 * 1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2020
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Eliot Hall (Reed College)
Hello:

I finished the copy edit partly done by another user of the article Eliot Hall (Reed College).

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

GAC India Ferrah
I'm doing the review for India Ferrah/GA1. Everything looks good, except for two items mentioned on the template. You need to be consistent on gender in the article, and we need sourcing for one item under Television. — Maile (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! Looking now. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for reviewing the article! If you're interested in a similar Good article nominee (by another editor, but I've been following along and support the article's promotion), you might take a look at Kameron Michaels. Either way, thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

India Ferrah GA
Congrats on the GA! I got your ping from the review page, but it seems a reply is not needed now? Armadillo pteryx  21:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Correct. Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

What is WikiProject Joe Biden?
It seems to be a redlink category getting added to a lot of articles. Isn't a project supposed to be a group of people working together on some topic or area? HouseOfChange (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not create any new WikiProjects in future unless it has been discussed and there is consensus among a group of editors that the project is needed. Otherwise your actions are disruptive, no matter how honorable your intentions are. Regards &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted, but not promised. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe (Puerto Vallarta)
Hello:

The rewrite copy edit you requested of the article Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe (Puerto Vallarta) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Much appreciated! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of 1776 Commission


The article 1776 Commission has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a non-existent entity. Yes, Trump said on September 17 that he would 'soon' create a 1776 Commission. That was in a speech where he also said 'If you demolish a statue without permission, you immediately get 10 years in prison.' Trump says many things that come to nothing. Surely it's not time for an article about 'the' 1776 Commission until a 1776 Commission actually exists?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen &#124; tålk 20:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 1776 Commission for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1776 Commission is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1776 Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fantasea II: The Second Wave


Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fantasea II: The Second Wave".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 08:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ajpolino • LuK3
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jackmcbarn
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

Technical news
 * The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (T261630).

Arbitration
 * The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
 * Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.

Miscellaneous
 * The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
 * Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bust of Hadrian


The article Bust of Hadrian has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The British Museum has 13 million items in its collection, including thousands of busts and statues, what makes this notable? Notability not established with substantive independent sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 00:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Cannabis culture
Hello, Another Believer,

I noticed that you have done some editing on this article and a new editor added a lot of material that they had developed in their user space. There are some useful references in there so reversion isn't appropriate but I'm not familiar with this article and I'm hoping you could look it over and see if the additions are improvements or unnecessary embellishments. Thanks Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Yes, I'll try to remember to take a look soon, and I'll also post a note at WP:420. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright articles


A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 15:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, but not sure why the category was ever empty. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft FYI
I started Draft:Jazelle Barbie Royale if you're interested in having a look and expanding. Cheers! ☆ Bri (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Wonderful, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2020
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 02:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Westerly


The article The Westerly has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:MILL. None-notable condo project with not SIGCOV. Sources are promotional in nature."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your prod of SLIR somehow failed
I just came across SLIR and was looking through the creator's talk page, and saw a notification of a proposed deletion. However, looking back through the edit history, I can't find any time you edited the page, and no indication of a PROD tag. You might want to check your Twinkle configuration. Vahurzpu (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hmm, bizarre. SLIR is mentioned here: User:Another Believer/PROD log. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * AfD. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ridgefield Cemetery


The article Ridgefield Cemetery has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet general notability as a local cemetery in a small town"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sounder Bruce  00:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Leda Valladares
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Leda Valladares has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Thanks!
Thanks for your helpful contributions to Mango (Saturday Night Live)! Just a friendly heads up, you forgot to bold your thing at the thing. Right cite (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, but I don't always worry about bolding text within comments/votes. I've read WP:AfD and bold text is not required. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay no problem. You too! Right cite (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg John M Wolfson
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bduke • Nilfanion • Philosopher • Rspeer • Yunshui

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg EdJohnston • Oshwah • Yamla
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Guideline and policy news
 * Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

Technical news
 * Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
 * Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
 * Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.

Arbitration
 * The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
 * The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.

Miscellaneous
 * A reminder that standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. (American Politics 2 Arbitration case).

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Lady Red Couture
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Lady Red Couture has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

GOCE requests
Hey, in the future, could you just give me a heads-up if you submit an article I've written alone to the GOCE? I was confused, shocked and a little upset to see that drive-through of Lady Red. As we discussed last year when Honey's article was up for GA, I copy edit professionally and have found GOCE edits to my articles to mostly introduce unambiguous errors and make otherwise neutral/subjective changes. It's a time-consuming pain to have to go through and re-correct all those "corrections" when the article was actually in better shape beforehand. Obviously no one owns any article, and anyone is free to make a GOCE request, but I would be very grateful for a courtesy ping if you make a request for an article to which I am the sole major contributor. Armadillo pteryx  11:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Sorry, I'll try to remember. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * No worries, and thanks! Armadillo  pteryx  19:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jamal Sims


The article Jamal Sims has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability not established"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 03:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jamal Sims for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamal Sims is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jamal Sims until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Sigh. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

November 21st ~ NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon
--Wil540 art (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! Would you mind sharing this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19 as well? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Palace Theatre (Silverton, Oregon) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palace Theatre (Silverton, Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Palace Theatre (Silverton, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Google...? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2020
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bust of Mahatma Gandhi, Shanghai


The article Bust of Mahatma Gandhi, Shanghai has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article. I couldn't find an indication that this is actually a notable statue, but sources proving me wrong are welcome of course."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
The article The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Congrats! Armadillo  pteryx  11:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW, I've just nominated Delta Cafe as well if you're interested in another PDX restaurant. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events
Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject for the edits you have done on Portal:Current events and other articles in the WikiProject's scope. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to invite you and hope you consider joining. (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I write about current events often, but pay very little attention to the current events portal. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Minor Barnstar

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Village pump (idea lab)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) § How can we better consolidate and discourage creation of overly-specific WikiProjects?. I'd particularly highlight Iridescent's comment, which presents better than I could an example of how inactive projects can be harmful. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delta Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delta Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 13:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delta Cafe
The article Delta Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delta Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Translations
Hi! I am new to wikipedia and have asked advice from other users where should I start if I want to contribute by doing translations. One of them advised that you were looking for help with Russian translations. If this is still the case, could you help me find a list of articles in Russian that require translation. Thank you! LoraxJr 20:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I sometimes seek help translating English articles into other languages, but I'm not sure about Russian entries needing translation into English. Is that what you're asking? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I could translate English articles into Russian too if that is needed. Could you notify me when something like that comes up? LoraxJr 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Well, I assume someone else mentioned this request to translate quality articles about drag queens into other languages, but my goal here was mostly to get articles promoted to Good/Featured status. More generally, I think you should just translate whatever articles interest you personally! Translation work is very important, but you should enjoy the content you're translating. :) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be one of the topics I could work on. Thank you, I will look into that.LoraxJr 21:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Great, thanks! I write about a lot of different topics. If you seen any FAs/GAs on my profile page (User:Another Believer), I'd love to see some of them translated into other languages as well. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boxer Ramen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boxer Ramen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boxer Ramen
The article Boxer Ramen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boxer Ramen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I've just nominated Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) if you or Gerald Waldo Luis are interested. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
The article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
The article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of XLB (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article XLB (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of XLB (Portland, Oregon)
The article XLB (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:XLB (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Club Feathers
Do you think it would be reasonable to nominate Club Feathers for GA? I feel it's written on par with my other venue GAs, but I have reservations about that since there do not appear to be any images available to add to the article. Not sure if that would normally be a deal-breaker at GAN. Armadillo pteryx  01:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Go for it! Not being illustrated is not a deal-breaker. I've just nominated Brix Tavern myself. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks! Armadillo  pteryx  01:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your GA nomination of Davis Street Tavern
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Davis Street Tavern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That's an interesting article, AB! From its talk page I realized there's a project in destubbing articles, I'll see if I can contribute. I recently nominated Ave Maryam as FAC, perhaps you can give advice.  Gerald WL  17:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Davis Street Tavern
The article Davis Street Tavern you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Davis Street Tavern for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I've nominated Brix Tavern, Byways Cafe, and Pied Cow Coffeehouse as well. I'm in the midst of a Portland restaurant blitz, apparently! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brix Tavern
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brix Tavern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brix Tavern
The article Brix Tavern you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brix Tavern for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Byways Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Byways Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Byways Cafe
The article Byways Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Byways Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Gigi Goode

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)