User talk:Another Believer/Archive 45

Oregon Community Credit Union
Why did you delete most of my edits? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * History, services, assets all existed on that page for over a decade. I simply added current information. Why would you delete that? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * On a separate note, I don't know how to change the logo. I'm somewhat new to this. There is a new logo on their website. Can you change? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you able to tell me why you deleted the other information? Uplinkspyder (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * For the reasons mentioned in my revert's edit summary. Please do not add back any unsourced or promotional text, or unnecessary detail. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

You might be interested, given your question here. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-


 * BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
 * Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
 * Epicgenius with 1518 points
 * MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
 * BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
 * AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
 * Sammi Brie with 520 points
 * Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
 * BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
 * Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
 * LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
 * Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
 * 🇺🇦 Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Literary Arts, Inc.
Hello, Another Believer,

I just came across this draft looking over the list of "expiring drafts" for the next few hours. I delayed the deletion but I was wondering if you had any interest in polishing this draft up enough to warrant a move back to main space. If not, that's fine, just thought I'd ask given your expertise in creating articles on Portland, OR landmarks. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The org's probably notable but I'm not too concerned about rescuing this particular draft. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm unable to move the draft into main space, so I'll let others decide the page's fate. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).



Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg 0xDeadbeef
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Tamzin
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Pppery
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss · TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news
 * The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
 * There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
 * , and  have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections.  is the reserve commissioner.
 * Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
 * Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
 * Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
 * Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
 * An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous
 * The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey all you cool cats and kittens! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2023
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 03:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Drag queens
What I'm doing is an AWB run of pages that are in the tree, but are not simultaneously in the  tree. This means that everybody I'm editing is already in one or more LGBT X categories anyway, because they would never have shown up in my batch job at all if they weren't — and because AWB is just a tool for performing automated edits and not a tool for evaluating or reviewing content, I have no way to tell if any given category is problematic or not. So if there is a problem with anybody not being properly sourced as LGBT, that's not a "me doing bad things now" problem, it's a "somebody else did bad things before" problem. If you think anybody has sourcing problems, then feel free to remove any categories from them that aren't supported by proper sources — but anybody who showed up in my batch at all is already in the LGBT tree as it is, and AWB is only a tool for determining who is in a category while being absolutely useless at the question of whether they should be or not, so that's simply not a determination I can make in the process of an AWB batch run. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Bearcat Understood, thanks for the reply! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

A WCNA Barncompass for you!

 * @OhanaUnited Thank you! Likewise, your contributions related to Toronto have not gone unnoticed :) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Loosey LaDuca

 * @Baffle gab1978 Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Central Building (Seattle) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Building (Seattle) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Central Building (Seattle) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

I followed the AfD but it didn't look like it needed more keep votes. FYI there were some images and a little bit of text at MOHAI and UW's digital collections, I will put the links on the article's talkpage. If I make it over to the Seattle Public Library, I'll check the Seattle Room special collections. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invite template for WP:LGBT (part 2)
Hi Another Believer,

I return to our discussion about an Invite template for WP:LGBT.

Please have a look at User:Peaceray/sandbox/Wiki Loves Pride invite.

This is agnostic enough that it could be moved either into the Template namespace or as a subpage to WP:WLP. Once moved, the only change that would need to happen would be to remove the  tags from the categories on the /doc page.

Let me know about any changes that you have to suggest. Or should I start up a discussion at WT:WLP? Peaceray (talk) 05:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Peaceray Hi! No problem with having an invite for the annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, but our initial discussion was about an invitation for WikiProject LGBT studies. Have your changed your focus for this template? Also, feel free to post at WikiProject LGBT studies, if you'd like, as there's a larger audience there than Wiki Loves Pride. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Right you are! I should have checked our earlier conversation rather than merely linking to it. OK, now there are two invites:
 * User:Peaceray/sandbox/WikiProject LGBT studies invite
 * User:Peaceray/sandbox/Wiki Loves Pride invite
 * The latter had a couple of mistakes that I have corrected. Peaceray (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Peaceray Overall, these are great! For Wiki Loves Pride, you might consider changing "a group of editors that seeks to create, expand, improve, and maintain LGBT+ articles" to "a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related coverage" or similar. Semantics, really. Feel free to solicit feedback at WP LGBT studies and move into the main space whenever you are ready! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I made the text change. I will move the templates into the Template space & then ask for feedback on the talk page. They will not really get used until they are listed in-project.
 * Moving into the Template space has advantages since if becomes necessary to protect the templates then one has to be a template editor or an admin to make changes. Peaceray (talk) 05:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Tomorrow I will do that; bedtime approaches ... Peaceray (talk) 06:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Peaceray Sounds good!, and goodnight (good morning here) from Istanbul! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 06:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Statue of Süreyya İlmen moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Statue of Süreyya İlmen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Single source only says "His statue was erected in Yoğurtçu Park, for which he made great efforts", no significant coverage.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reywas92Talk 18:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Please leave me alone. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 59
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 59, September – October 2023 
 * Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
 * Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  02:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I just added categories. Putting this note on User:Expandinglight5's radar. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I didn't intend to plagarize the Eater article about Patina. I'll revise.  Thank you.  Expandinglight5 (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added back the categories and will consider this resolved. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 11:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

"Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unsung_Prophents_and_Dead_Messiahs&redirect=no Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Or-Shalem (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Also letting you two know, just in case! Thank you for helping to address the reviewing editor's concerns. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Lovely, thanks! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Hope we can collaborate again in the future. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I hope so as well. Historyday01 (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, thanks for orchestrating this! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 02:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia
The article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia for comments about the article, and Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Shushugah Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Good to see this is now GA. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ipigott Thank you! Following this article's development has been interesting. Much appreciation to the many editors who have contributed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 05:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain
The article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain for comments about the article, and Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @APK Thanks again for reviewing, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter August 2020
Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter August 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error
I apologize for making some errors lately, I'm not trying to do it intentionally, I swear. I guess I'm just not as used to working with huge blocks of text and sfn as I could be. Anyways, I've been trying to fix the CS1 errror that this edit apparently created and I can't for the life of me figure out what I messed up. I used the find feature in my browser and it doesn't look like I have any empty title parameters which would be the most obvious solution, at least to me? Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * And you're not even the person that fixed my error at Jehovah's Witnesses, that was . I'm quite embarrassed right now. Eek. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Well it's also sorted out. Apologies for the case of mistaken identity and the unnecessary notifications. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Clovermoss No worries at all! I've made bigger mistakes in life :p Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ganesha811 · JPxG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ajpolino · Lourdes · Mairi · RockMFR · Somno · WilyD
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox · Opabinia regalis

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox · Opabinia regalis

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.

Arbitration
 * Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
 * The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
 * Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Just leaving this here because i know some people have turned off pings ...
Any thoughts on User_talk:Sheila1988? You were a co-nom at the FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Dank Thanks! Replied (I don't feel strongly either way.) Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews
The article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews for comments about the article, and Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2023
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles
The article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles for comments about the article, and Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Bonnie Blue Southern Market & Bakery
Since you're quite the expert on local restaurants, does this article look promotional? I tried to avoid that, but every source was very positive. APK hi :-)  ( talk ) 01:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @APK I'm more of a content creator than a reviewer, as evidenced by my many GAs but lack of GA reviews. I've been accused of not including negative info in restaurant articles, but as long as the summary is representative of coverage then you should be fine. I would recommend asking for feedback, or even review, at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. I think the project is generally active and there might be reviewers familiar with standards for NRHP-related restaurants. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Netflix original programming by language has been nominated for deletion
Category:Netflix original programming by language has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- wooden superman  09:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seattle Coffee Works


A tag has been placed on Seattle Coffee Works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"accepting draft from AfC, can't do that with the redirect"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drowssap SMM  16:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Coffee Works has been accepted
 Seattle Coffee Works, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Seattle_Coffee_Works help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Drowssap SMM  16:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Much appreciated and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 02:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @TrademarkedTWOrantula Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works
The article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seattle Coffee Works for comments about the article, and Talk:Seattle Coffee Works/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @TrademarkedTWOrantula Thanks again for reviewing! Happy Holidays and New Year! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luna DuBois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Looking forward to addressing your concerns. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe
The article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. I have a few more articles at WP:GAN if you're interested, otherwise happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe
The article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png


 * Thank you, and likewise! Happy New Year --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Mistress Isabelle Brooks

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * @DrowssapSMM Thank you! Much appreciated. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * @BuySomeApples Thanks! I've nominated the article for Good status, which User:TrademarkedTWOrantula is currently reviewing. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of DiDa Ritz


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article DiDa Ritz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Thecheeseistalking98 Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of DiDa Ritz
The article DiDa Ritz you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:DiDa Ritz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I hope you'll engage in the talk page discussion I've started, since I didn't even get a chance to address any of your concerns. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I've re-nominated because I believe the article meets GA criteria. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked for sockpuppetry. Sigh... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy Holidays
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

★Trekker (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @StarTrekker Thanks! Happy holidays and New Year! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Meetup in Seattle on 16 January 2024
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

The Girlfriend Experience (drag queen)
Hi! Sorry for the Spanish: En la Wikipedia en español nos pusieron una plantilla de borrado en este artículo, lo que nos obligó a aumentar el contenido y referencias. ¿Podrías traer esa información aquí? Saludos! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @MiguelAlanCS No need to apologize, but I'm limited in my ability to help. You might post a similar request for assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drag Race. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Dozen Doughnut Company has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Daily Dozen Doughnut Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Daily_Dozen_Doughnut_Company help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Dr vulpes  (Talk) 19:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * For sure, and feel free to add back the content I removed. It wasn't bad or anything I just sort of felt it was a bit much but also didn't know if I should cut just a little or what. I hope I can visit that place next time I'm in the area.  Dr vulpes  (Talk) 20:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dr vulpes Thanks, but I will let other editors worry about the Reception. I see User:7&6=thirteen might be restoring select text. I'm fine with whatever others think is best! Thanks again --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Daily Dozen Doughnut Company

 * Good job. Keep your eye on the doughnut and not the hole.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 20:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @7&6=thirteen Thanks for your work on the article. I see the same couple of editors are already trying to crash the donut party. Disappointing and frustrating, but not surprising. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG should end the debate.
 * They lose sight of the benefit to readers. Endian controversy.  Sad.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Daily Dozen Doughnut Company
My plot to bribe you for doughnuts was foiled by @Dr vulpes. :( S0091 (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The Simpsons Barnstar Hires.svg
 * Next wiki conference I go to, I should bring dozens of donuts! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I support your proposal even though I will not personally benefit. I guess I must craft another plot to obtain some delicious fried dough. :) S0091 (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hoping you can keep an eye on the article and talk page. Seems the same couple editors are trying to cancel the donut party already. Also putting this on User:Bbb23's and User:Liz's radar since they may recall how things unfolded last year. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Bbb23, I meant to ping User:Blablubbs. My mistake. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Yet another Daily Dozen Doughnut Company thread
Can scarcely believe it's been more than a year since that surreal AfD... I'd placed the article on my watchlist and am glad to see it back in the mainspace again. Scope_creep's suggestion that you're an undisclosed paid editor (unless he had something or somebody else in mind when he said "The more time passes the more I think this editor is a UPE.") is definitely deserving of censure (at the very least!). Anyway, kudos to you and happy new year! KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 20:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Kingoflettuce Don't hold your breath. This editor has made many similar comments about me in the past. I've been documenting and have plenty of receipts, and I've also told them to leave me alone many times. I'm not holding my breath the community will do anything about it, so I just ignore the BS and keep editing. Who knew little donuts could cause so much drama!? Happy New Year and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Pings to ChristieBot
Hi -- I just got a ping (well, ChristieBot got the ping, and that pings me) from this edit, but I'm not sure what you were doing there -- are you just moving the notifications around? If so, it would be helpful if you'd drop (or noping) the mentions of ChristieBot to avoid pinging me unnecessarily. Thanks (and Happy New Year!) -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Mike Christie Sorry! I was just merging sections for organizational purposes, before an end-of-the-month archive. I thought "pings" only happened when new signatures were added, so apologies for the false alarms. Happy New Year and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You know, you're right -- they should only happen when new signatures are happening. My guess would be that if you move the section the algorithm doesn't realize it's only moving it  and things you're actually writing a whole new section, so it adds a ping. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 21:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Comeback Seattle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Comeback Seattle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)