User talk:Anothervorld

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Anothervorld, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Etyen Mahçupyan seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyvio's
Stop uploading copyrighted images that you do not have permission to use. If continued you may be blocked for editing without further notices. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Your addition to Etyen Mahçupyan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Etyen_Mahcupyan.jpg - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 04:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Public Policy and Democracy Studies


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Public Policy and Democracy Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Etyen Mahçupyan. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 18:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Your recent editing history at Etyen Mahçupyan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 19:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with

Hi there, I have been trying to reach one of admins that blocked me. I tried to leave messages to their talk pages with no success. I am new at wikipedia and I constantly violated copyright issues and as a result I have been blocked. Since then, I clearly read all instructions. Now I have more knowledge about how to work on a wikipage. I am just wondering If my block is going to be lifted sometime? I will really appreciate If I m given another chance so that I can finish my project at wikipedia. I will also appreciate whether you guys can tell me If my account will never be unblocked. At least I would know and forget about this project. Thank you for understanding..

Anothervorld (talk) 08:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You can make another unblock request by following the instructions above. Your block is "indefinite", which means that it has no specific date at which you'll be automatically unblocked, and your account will remain blocked until successfully appealed.  If you read our guide to appealing blocks, it will give you a lot of help in learning what we look for.  If you can't convince an administrator to unblock you now, you can to wait six months and ask for the "standard offer".  That, too, can be declined, but it's at least a possible way forward. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Outside of the copyvio issue, you still have not addressed the concerns of the quality of your edits brought up by or your use of a sock account here and on Commons.  -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to unblock here, and in any case am not the blocking admin. But I'll freely grant that some of the problem could have come from language issues, too. Please, if you are the reviewing admin, consider reviewing this on the basis of the block, which was for copyright issues, and consider my point about the wording to be satisfied by a combination of language issues and the above unblock request whether Anothervorld addresses the neutrality issues. --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Yamla for your niceness..and I understand and accept the final decision of the admins.. I will study first wikipedia rules ..