User talk:Anotherwidowsson

Operation Minstead
I've reverted your edits to this page. Once again thy are very non-"Neutral Point of view" and directed at Morgan especially. I get the impression that your may be emotionally invested in the case. Please remember that having a go at Morgan is not the point of the article - SimonLyall (talk) 19:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Anotherwidowsson (talk)(talk) 21:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

There is no doubt as to the facts; it appears though that there is one anonymous contributor who insists on distorting them. If you perhaps look at THIS Daily Mail piece the facts are plain. This was widely reported in the media at the time, but I choose this example as not only does it represent the true position but if you see the comments added to it by 'Alan of Sidcup' you can appreciate there is one person who for some reason has a (incorrect) bee in his bonnet about this case. I suspect he is the source of the continual changes to the Wiki article re-istating Morgan to a part in the investigation which he simply never fulfilled.

I have therefore replaced the facts as they should be represented, but removed the more judgmental comments to which I think you - probably correctly - took exception.