User talk:Anshuman Burman

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Draft:Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Wikipedia is not the place to argue that established science is incorrect. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Next time you will be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * unfortunately, Mr Burman has decided to ignore your warnings Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong


The article Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Completely contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. WP:OR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong


A tag has been placed on Anshuman Burman, found Einstein was wrong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)