User talk:AnsrieJames9/Archive 1

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Heartful Café, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 01:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. CMD (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Revirginized


The article Revirginized has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to draft until release and then notability can be determined."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

BuKo Channel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, BuKo Channel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  D My Son  03:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gello Marquez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gello Marquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gello Marquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 12:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

I want to end this discussion today please, HueMan1. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Striking other user's comments
I saw that you struck 's comment/!vote at Articles for deletion/Gello Marquez. Please do not do that again. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 16:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

We want to end this discussion tomorrow AnsrieJames9 (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Who? — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 01:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Respect the comments of others. NewManila2000 (talk) 23:34, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

NewManila2000, Thank you AnsrieJames9 (talk) 01:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gameboys: The Movie


The article Gameboys: The Movie has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  14:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gameboys: The Movie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gameboys: The Movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameboys: The Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donald D23  talk to me  01:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Criza Taa moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Criza Taa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thank you. Whiteguru (talk) 01:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Article lacks information about this person
 * Article should have birth date or birth year
 * Article should have categories
 * Information should be added to the sections
 * There needs to be independent sources that write about this person.

Jeremiah Lisbo
Hi there, I've noticed you've made a few articles for some He's Into Her cast members, but many of them have been deleted/merged. I think many of them (Rhys, Criza, Melizza, etc.) most likely do not have the notability to have their own articles at this time, since they have few credits. But I think Jeremiah Lisbo is sufficiently notable to have his own article (due to his involvement in a number of movies and TV series). I was wondering what happened to the Lisbo article you created, was it deleted?

I think I may decide to work on a draft article for Lisbo, using your former article as a base. I think with sufficient links to outside sources (in this case news articles) the article will be able to stand without being deleted. Koikefan (talk) 00:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hueman1 saids not notable for article AnsrieJames9 (talk) 01:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

He's Into Her (song) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, He's Into Her (song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Source
Hi I'm. I saw some of your articles. I noticed that some of the articles you've written has only one source. Please improve your articles by adding a Reliable source. MaccWiki (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Angela Ken for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela Ken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Angela Ken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 06:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naelah Alshorbaji


The article Naelah Alshorbaji has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to meet WP:BLP1E policy; every source relates to Miss Philippines Earth 2021."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bri.public (talk) 18:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Naelah Alshorbaji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naelah Alshorbaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naelah Alshorbaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 16:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Ken, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  02:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did with at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Ken. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. I thank you for undoing your edit, but in the future, if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  03:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeremiah Lisbo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremiah Lisbo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Lisbo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Shanaia Gomez moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shanaia Gomez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheChronium 15:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Shanaia Gomez has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shanaia Gomez. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanaia Gomez (August 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shanaia Gomez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shanaia Gomez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shanaia_Gomez Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shanaia_Gomez reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam
As a heads up, I have moved the article you created to Draft:Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam. My concern is that the article was basically unsourced, the only sources included were marketing materials. Please take the time to find secondary, reliable sources to get the article ready for the mainspace. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY 2008 13:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Lisbo
Good day. Can you please revert your closure on that discussion? What you did is a clear indication of WP:BADNAC. Per WP:NACINV, editors should never close any discussion where they have !voted. In other words, you already voted in the discussion. Therefore, you are not allowed to close the discussion. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes, added 1 more weeks and reverted AnsrieJames9 (talk) 01:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Crystal Paras
Hello, AnsrieJames9,

Thank you for creating Crystal Paras.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"* This article is very close to WP:TOOSOON.
 * The references are only "mention", that is, there is only one incidence of this lady's name on each reference.
 * What is needful is indepedent, reliable sources to establish notability for this lady. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Crystal Paras moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Crystal Paras, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 15:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Crystal Paras for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crystal Paras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Crystal Paras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 01:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

OK, thanks AnsrieJames9 (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The Gaming House moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Gaming House, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

The Gaming House moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Gaming House, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 14:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Gaming House (September 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Gaming House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Gaming House, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Gaming_House Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Gaming_House reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please read this.
Non-admin closure. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 05:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)