User talk:Ant75

License tagging for Image:Ngungun from Tibrogargan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ngungun from Tibrogargan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Ngungun from Tibrogargan Small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ngungun from Tibrogargan Small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Ocean_from_Tibrogargan_Summit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ocean_from_Tibrogargan_Summit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

May 2008
Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Wikipedia is not a HOWTO guide, so please stop adding instructions on how to run Tomb Raider under different Windows versions.  [Jam] [talk] 00:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I've replied on my talk page.  [Jam] [talk] 07:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Book of Mormon edits
Your edits on the Book of Mormon page need to be discussed first on the Talk Page if there are any objections to them. There are objections since you are removing qualifying statements from the text ("Smith said", "Smith stated", etc.). The Golden Plates were NOT written in Reformed Egyptian--Joseph Smith SAID the plates were written in Reformed Egyptian. That is entirely different. The plates do not exist, so the only evidence of what language they may or may not have been written in was Smith's statement. Please discuss your proposed changes on the Talk Page before you try to edit this paragraph again. The group of editors who have been toiling over this article for over a year will come to a consensus. (Taivo (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC))

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ant75! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tina Bride -

january 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Media Player Classic do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.&mdash;J. M. (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Glidos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glidos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Glidos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. damiens.rf 17:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Plug letter codes
Hi, you left an untitled and unsigned comment on my talk page. I suggest you study the information on letter codes which is included here, here and here.

The IEC is the source of these codes, but they are informal and not subject to any standard. The website you referenced is a self published advertising site which has no official standing, the author of that site appears to have invented the "Type O" designation, the author also references the obsolete US Department of trade list which is notoriously inaccurate, and does not include letters types M or N, let alone O! FF-UK (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Type C incompatibility with Type D
You have again, inappropriately, raised an issue on my personal talk page which, if you wish it to be discussed, should have been raised on the article talk page. I note that this is a theme which you have promoted before on a different article, Talk:AC_power_plugs_and_sockets/Archive_5. You did not then achieve a consensus for your theory because there are no WP reliable sources to support the claim of compatibility. Compatibility as a concept demands more than evidence that it is used in practice. The IEC World Plugs definition of Type C states "It fits into any socket that accepts 4.0 – 4.8 mm round contacts on 19 mm centres", however, a Type D socket is designed to accept pins having a diameter of 5.1 mm and therefore falls outside that range. The unofficial website which you offered to support your claim includes the following Q&A:

"Will a standard European electric plug (2 round pins) fit into a power point in India?"

"Yes. To insert the 2 pin plug into a Type D 3 Pin socket which in some cases may be closed by default, push a pen into the Ground/Earth terminal. This opens up the protected 2 Pin terminals and you can insert the 2 Pin plug."

This is a reference to the fact that Type D sockets often include protective shutters operated by the earth pin. If tampering with the socket protection by means of a foreign body is required to inset a plug, then that plug and socket combination cannot be legitimately described as compatible. FF-UK (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)