User talk:AntJack1981

November 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Additionally, you seem to be on a mission with this - please see WP:RGW with regard to zealotry. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * This ammunition is used to commit acts of murder. I have provided a citation as required. Facts do not care about your feelings, if you do not like the way I have worded it, write it your own way. But it is a fact and therefore suitable for Wikipedia. AntJack1981 (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It's also used as a bottle opener, earrings, cufflinks, and pens which are facts, but we don't consider them a primary use of the article subject either. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Additional - and let's be serious for a moment. The lede is to summarise the contents of the entire article in a few sentences.  It's not the place to introduce new material - which is why the lede generally doesn't need sourcing:  If a statement in the lede may seem controversial or contentious it can have additional sourcing, but if something is in the lede, it must be corroborated and sourced by the article proper.  This doesn't just mean gaming the system by a single incident as you used previously, but to qualify as being lede-worthy it must be discussed in depth and have several reliable and relevant sources.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)