User talk:Antabus

Welcome
Hello, Antabus! Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this:. Four tildes ( ~ ) will produce your name and the current date. You should always sign talk pages, but not articles. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AnnH (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

P.S. Thanks for helping at Salem Witch Trials I thought I had reverted all that vandalism, but I see now that I didn't go back far enough. AnnH (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism and how to report it
Hi, thanks for your messages. I would have known it was yours even though you forgot to sign the first time, as the page history shows who made which changes. It's great to see a newcomer interested in reverting vandalism. If the last edit is the vandalism one, you can go to the previous edit in the page history, open that one, click on edit (you'll get a message telling you that it's an out-of-date version) and save, with an edit summary of "revert vandalism". If, however, someone vandalizes the fourth paragraph, and another person comes along ten minutes later, doesn't notice the vandalism, and makes a perfectly good edit to the eighth paragraph, you have to revert by removing the bad changes from the current version, which is more troublesome. Since I'm an administrator, I have a special "rollback" button for reverting vandalism. So if someone makes five consecutive edits to an article, and I consider that they're vandalism, I click on rollback, and the page is restored to the version of the last editor before the vandal, regardless of whether the vandal made one, five, or eighteen changes. It's possible even that someone could make four good changes and one bad one, and would get the whole thing rolled back. The problem with the Salem Witch Trials was that the vandal vandalized with a few consecutive edits, another editor with a similar IP address made an edit, and then the vandal continued. When I pressed "rollback", it only went back as far as the editor who had interrupted the vandalism, not as far back as the last editor before the vandalism started.

For further information, you might like to read Vandalism, Vandalism in Progress, and Administrator intervention against vandalism. I've been keeping an eye on the Salem page for a while, but I don't know very much about the case, so I'm not always sure that an edit is vandalism. Another page with the same problem is Institut Le Rosey. Anonymous editors keep adding the names of people who are supposed to have studied there. Some may be true; some are obvious hoaxes. It can be a little difficult knowing when and when not to revert. Thanks again. AnnH (talk) 11:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Helpdesk talk
Hi, I saw you posted your question on the talk page of the helpdesk instead of the project page. The talk page is about the helpdesk itself, the project page is the actual helpdesk. Easy mistake to make though. Therefore I moved it accordingly to the project page. See Help_desk. My response is also there. Garion96 (talk) 03:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

What the BLEEP? - Deaf or Mute?
If she was mute, she wouldnt be able to speak. The character in the movie spoke at least once - something along the lines of, "Amanda, dont be an asshole." The utterance of that phrase assures us that she isnt mute. --AStanhope 21:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * She spoke in sign language and her roommate/buddy spoke to her in sign language. She is also Marlee Matlin - a non-mute deaf woman in real life.  --AStanhope 21:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Groovy. Nice to make your acquaintence.  See you around.  --AStanhope 22:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Batstarg.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Batstarg.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)