User talk:AntaineLee

Your submission at Articles for creation: Em Schulz (March 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Em Schulz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Em Schulz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Em_Schulz Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Em_Schulz reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Em Schulz


A tag has been placed on Draft:Em Schulz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.andthatswhywedrink.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  00:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikihow addition
''I added in the section "In Popular Media", as recently, the podcast My Brother, My Brother, and Me have begun featuring a segment where they read a WikiHow article. Seeing as they had a bit featuring Yahoo! Answers and they are featured on the Yahoo! Answers Wikipedia page, I thought it would be fitting to add it here''

I'm sorry, but unless some reliable source actually discusses this to attest to its notability -- as in, evidence that the world at large is taking note of this -- it's trivia, at best. I've removed it for now, pending any sort of evidence of its importance. --Calton &#124; Talk 12:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Fandom
Fandom (and in fact any wiki) is not a reliable source. Please stop adding content to articles sourced to fandom. Schazjmd  (talk)  16:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * oh whoops my bad my guy
 * sorry i saw someone do it once and it didn't occur to me to double check or anything
 * i'll make note of that (insert salute emoji here) antaine (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)