User talk:Anteagaro

Welcome!
Hello, Anteagaro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Brain Games edits
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I realize I've now reverted your edits to Brain Games (National Geographic) twice, and I don't wish to discourage you from contributing, so I wanted to explain my reasoning.

First of all, the infobox: "the 'caption' parameter is not intended for a general description of the show. It's a caption specifically for the infobox image, and as the infobox does not have an image, it does not need a caption. If you look closely, you actually overwrote the 'image' parameter and replaced it with the network name - the network is already mentioned below, though, so it does not need to be listed again. Please see Template:Infobox television for details on the specific infobox used in the article, and Help:Template for general information on how templates are used.

Second, your edit created a minor grammatical error in the lead paragraph, and you removed a sentence about Neil Patrick Harris hosting - You did not explain this change, and I believe the statement to be correct, so I'm not sure why it was removed.

Next, the short paragraphs you added after the lead are mostly redundant, and the original content is perhaps not the most encyclopedic. For instance, "The brain is one of the most mysterious concepts in science." reads like opinion, and even if it's true, it's not really relevant to this article unless it can be connected to the show by a reliable source (for example: was this an influence in the show's development?). It's not up to Wikipedia editors to editorialize or provide their own original ideas to supplement an article - this constitutes original research, which is not allowed. The second person perspective is also not appropriate for an encyclopedic article. You're writing about a subject, not speaking to the reader.

Lastly, the section heading "Cast" is sufficient as a main heading. It's not necessary to list every possible role. The section below is already broken down into two subsections, and I think "main" and "featured" are fine at delineating the differences.

If you would like to discuss these or other issues with the content of the article, feel free to start a new topic on the article's talk page. Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)