User talk:Anteaterlover

Welcome!
Hello, Anteaterlover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page In the Night Garden... did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of In the Night Garden... characters, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Puppy Dog Pals, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Puppy Dog Pals has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Puppy Dog Pals was changed by Anteaterlover (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853678 on 2019-02-07T07:42:01+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Puffin, you may be blocked from editing. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did in Top Wing, you may be blocked from editing. Movies Time (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to River Thames, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your additions were not appropriate for the first para of the lede. David Biddulph (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kiri and Lou


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kiri and Lou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)