User talk:Antediluvian67

Nomination of Jaya Ho for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaya Ho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jaya Ho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Jimmie Rodgers (country singer), you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Jimmy Rodgers, Jimmie Rogers and James Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Proposed deletion of Binders full of women


The article Binders full of women has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacks substantial coverage as a meme. Too soon.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Multilingualism
Hi Antediluvian67! Thank you for a well-written section in Multilingualism, but why don't you add a single source? Please add it now! Thank you,  Lova Falk     talk   08:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Binders full of women for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Binders full of women is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Binders full of women & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=724087798 your edit] to Peggy Lee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * She returned to North Dakota for a [tonsillectomy], and was noticed by hotel owner Frank Bering while working at the Doll House in [[

High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
As this essay was mostly written by English editor User:ThatPeskyCommoner (sadly no longer editing), it should be left in British English. I've reverted to "burgled" and "burnt". Pam D  17:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Cankles) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Cankles, Antediluvian67!

Wikipedia editor Pianoman320 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for making this disambiguation page. I tweaked the wording to fit other disambiguation pages and added the right template."

To reply, leave a comment on Pianoman320's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Who would win in a fight listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who would win in a fight. Since you had some involvement with the Who would win in a fight redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 00:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World's Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017


The article World's Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * This page's subject could be sufficiently explained within the article 2017 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act replacement proposals rather than requiring its own article. I propose transforming this page into a redirect, and transferring applicable content to the article 2017 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act replacement proposals SecretName101 (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SecretName101 (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

STS, copy/paste moves
Hi there,

I noticed you copy/pasted text at Science, technology and society to Science, technology, and society. I've undone this for two reasons:

The big thing is that to move a page, you cannot just copy/paste text. Every page has an edit history, and copy/pasting text effectively removes all of it (or rather, leaves it behind and starts a new one). There is a special function for moving. If you're using the default settings, see the tabs at the top, under "more", there is an option to move. That will move the page and all of the edits in the history of the page to the new location. A related issue is attribution -- while all content on Wikipedia is free to copy, use, modify, etc. it is copyrighted under a license that requires attribution to the editors who have worked on a page. For this reason, copying within Wikipedia requires attribution. More information on how to move a page here: Moving a page. More information about copying within Wikipedia here: Copying within Wikipedia.

The other thing is that changing a page's title is typically a big deal and there needs to be a good reason for doing so. Adding an Oxford comma because of personal preference is only very rarely ok anywhere on Wikipedia (likewise removing one just due to personal preference), and the only reason to move a page based on such a comma would be if the comma is part of a proper noun. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 21:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mexican states by population 2013.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Mexican states by population 2013.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Crazy like a fox listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Crazy like a fox. Since you had some involvement with the Crazy like a fox redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Muzilon (talk) 11:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Stanky Doodle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stanky Doodle. Since you had some involvement with the Stanky Doodle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

"Very stable genius" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Very stable genius. Since you had some involvement with the Very stable genius redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

"Blue guy" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blue guy. Since you had some involvement with the Blue guy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 05:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

"Blue Guy" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blue Guy. Since you had some involvement with the Blue Guy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 05:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

"Old-timers' disease" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Old-timers%27_disease&redirect=no Old-timers' disease] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. There are several similar redirects in the same discussion, one other that you created. A7V2 (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World's Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017


The article World's Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, not discussed in AHCA article, no updates"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)