User talk:Antguy12

December 2023
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie,
 * I'm a research student, who has been working on QR codes as part of my graduate project. Many of parts of the article on QR code is outdated and does not reflect on the extensivity of the development of QR codes in the real world. Hence, I wrote the article. I've tried sourcing from the most reliable sources I could find. For instance, there were no proper papers on AI generated QR codes, but it had gone extremely viral on Reddit and many individuals and corporations have tried incorporating them across the globe. There were only blogs which were reporting about the same. Please do tell any other issues you felt regarding the same. Antguy12 (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If all you can find are blogs, vendor websites and other unreliable sources, you should leave the content out rather than compromise Wikipedia's content sourcing policies. MrOllie (talk) 21:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)