User talk:Antho99

Global Warning was broadcast on pay per view in Asia. Do not change that again thank you. 121.214.36.29 (talk) 21:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Reverting sources
Unless you can demonstrate that the source used is unreliable or otherwise, you can not revert edits that are supported by the source. Also please note that another edit on Professional wrestling in Australia may violate WP:3RR which is punishable by a suspension. Thank you. Curse of Fenric (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

http://board.flashkit.com/board/showthread.php?309637-WWE-%28formerly-WWF%29-Global-Warming-Tour-info! I am only correcting a piece of incorrect information.
 * Forums are not reliable sources - and it's a lie anyway because there WAS an intermission as an example! And it was on pay per view as the current source shows. Curse of Fenric (talk) 05:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

It was not on PPV and the post contains the information direct from the [http://board.flashkit.com/board/showthread.php?309637-WWE-%28formerly-WWF%29-Global-Warming-Tour-info! Ticketmaster7 site]. This was a house show filmed and released on DVD, it may have also aired as part of the Fanatics series but i've not found any fir evidence of this, it didn't air live anywhere in the world or even on delay as was the case with Rodman Down Under and the show has never been seen in it's entirety by anybody who wasn't there. There is no reason to continue to claim this show was a pay per view when there is no evidence to suggest it was, show me a WWE website that claims it as a PPV and I'll stop editing this page, until then any reference to this being a pay per view event is misleading and will be removed. Antho99 (talk) 08:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I was there. It was a pay per view and presented as such to pay per view providers in Asia - live. That is what Tony Chimel said on the night. The Ticketmaster quote was out of date (it was from May before the tickets went on sale). It claimed there would not be an intermission - and there was. The reference on the page now is accurate. There is no reference on the WWE website of any of the UK pay per views either just by the way, and yet they happened just as Global Warning did. Also, it was shown as part of the Fanatics Series in November 2002 (it was advertised during the Survivor Series pay per view - I have that on tape, now DVD). You will not remove any claim that has a source. If you do will be IDed as a vandal and treated accordingly. Curse of Fenric (talk) 23:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry but it was not a PPV any where and all reference to it as such will be removed.Antho99 (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Remove it and you will be labelled a vandal. The source that is there says that it was a pay per view and that's the end of it. Curse of Fenric (talk) 09:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

I am done making changes, consider it a compromise, it is now historically accurate, do not change it again. Thankyou Antho99 (talk) 09:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have restored the source you removed (and retained what you added about the Fanatic Series). THAT is historically accurate and you will not remove it. That is your last warning. Curse of Fenric (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your source is inaccurate, it's nothing more than a fan blog. Did you know every WWE PPV is now available on the WWE Network? All of them are listed it includes all the UK only PPV's, it does not include Global Warning as it was not a PPV. If your not happy with that here is another source. If you don't like that one here is another or another they list the UK PPV's because they were PPV's they don't list Global Warning because it was not a PPV. That is why your source is inaccurate and will be removed. Please demonstrate country, channel it was broadcast on. Otherwise those 3 words need to be removed. Antho99 (talk) 07:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * They will not be removed. The source is not a fan blog. It is a legit website that backs up my own experience - Tony Chimel stated that it was going into Asia on pay per view on the night. It will be added to the WWE Network in due course I'm sure, once the Network catches on in Australia (at the moment I understand it's not because of our download rates). I am presently researching what channels in Asia in 2002 presented pay per views as Main Event did and does here, and it will take some time as it appears that there have been many changes since then and nothing is online so I have to find hardcopy sources. I will be checking the newspaper report on the show in the Herald Sun to see if that mentioned it. You will not touch the article in the mean time. Clear? Curse of Fenric (talk) 07:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Additional - the third source is user generated and therefore unreliable. The fourth source only lists US pay per views (the UK ones are missing). The fifth source relies on PPV's that Meltzer had access to, and if he didn't have a source in Asia he would have missed Global Warning. Curse of Fenric (talk) 08:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm over this argument, you can change the page as you like but need to remove the three words Pay Per View, call it a supercard, special event or anything else but this show was not shown on pay per view. It was filmed for DVD, released on DVD, the DVD was broadcast and added to Classics on demand but as a Pay per view I'm sorry but no, didn't happen. I will change this page as I see fit as it's a public encyclopedia and that's how it works, deal with it. There is no need for you to reply I am uninterested in any more comments from you. Antho99 (talk) 09:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Which means the next time you try to take out the sourced material, you will be reported as a vandal. Your choice. Curse of Fenric (talk) 10:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You are trying to corrupt a legitimate source yet you still have no prof and your "source" is nothing more than fan fiction, read the wikipedia rules, I have done nothing wrong and I can remove your source as it is inaccurate, is unproven, has no back up anywhere on the internet, in it's place I have located multiple sources that do not list this event as PPV. I have attempted to work with you and all you have done is threaten me, all I ask for is a country and channel. You simply cannot say it was a PPV in Asia because I think I heard the ring announcer say it would be. You do understand there are many Asian countries, the majority of which in 2002 didn't have to pay for PPV.

Please read up on Wikipedia vandalism you will see I am not the vandal here, I am fully within my rights to update the page as I have been. Get you facts together before you threaten me again. Antho99 (talk) 08:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I have my facts right and you do not. The present source is fact, not fiction, and it backs up my personal experience overcoming any OR issue that might exist. I didn't think I heard Chimel. I KNOW I heard him - and the "free" PPV's that you are talking about from the time were illegal feeds which at the time even Foxtel had issues with. It was big business in Asia then. Each and every source you have provided I have already bunked complete with reasons, and what you found clearly shows how easy it is to alter - and it is therefore unreliable. You are yet to provide a RELIABLE source, and I am still looking for hardcopy back up just to shut you up once and for all. But as it stands - the source that's there is the only reliable source available and it backs me and not you. So it stays. End of. Curse of Fenric (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Additional - removing sources is bad faith and frowned upon on Wikipedia (I also corrected your sourcing on this edit as the ref list was getting annoying. You don't do that on a talk page). Curse of Fenric (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Additional - more evidence that it was a pay per view added. Hardcopy still to come. Curse of Fenric (talk) 03:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your sources are no good, they remain works of fan fiction. Where is a legitimate source that states the channel and country you allege this aired on PPV? I have once again edited this page as a goodwill gesture and because I am tired of this argument. It is fair and caters for both our arguments, allow it to stay as is and that will be the end of it, continue to revert it and I will continue with this argument until you locate solid indisputable proof. Antho99 (talk) 07:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * They are legitimate sources. Your edit contradicts them and you can't do that. The end. Curse of Fenric (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Once again provide country and channel or accept the edit. It was a fair compromise. Your sources are works of fiction, they contain no information about PPV broadcast and are not from official sources like the WWE or a television network, edit the page yourself to make this clear or I will. Antho99 (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)