User talk:Anthony

Don't template the regulars

If you want to send me a message, please email me.

I object to usurpation.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trademark
Template:Trademark has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Demographics
Template:Demographics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Coprenician system listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coprenician system. Since you had some involvement with the Coprenician system redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  04:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Todd Krampitz


The article Todd Krampitz has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced bio of non notable person."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Formics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Formics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

"Universtiy of Connecticut" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Universtiy of Connecticut. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  22:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Typographers has been nominated for renaming
Category:Typographers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Transit of Venus Featured article review
I have nominated Transit of Venus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Navbox Canada
Template:Navbox Canada has been nominated for merging with Template:Navbox. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Trialpears (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback on Vector (2022) conversation
Hello! As a member of WikiProject Usability, I wanted to draw your attention to a conversation currently underway on WP:VPR (see the beginning of the discussion) around adopting Vector 2022 as the new default skin.

The Web team at the Wikimedia Foundation has been working on Vector 2022 for the past three years, collaborating with the English Wikipedia community as well as other wikis to ensure that the skin performs better qualitatively and quantitatively for readers and communities than the previous Vector skin. The goal of the new skin is to create a more welcoming and easier to use experience for readers and editors across the wiki. For more details, see our new FAQ.

For the past couple of months, we have collected thoughts from the English Wikipedia community on what changes need to be made to the skin prior to it being considered ready for deployment. Our next step would be to start an RfC to assess whether the community considers Vedtor 2022 ready.

Prior to the beginning of the RfC, we wanted to draw your attention to the current conversation and encourage your feedback on the skin.

Thank you, OVasileva (WMF), SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikimediaNoLicensing
Template:WikimediaNoLicensing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frostly (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Anime conventions has been nominated for renaming
Category:Anime conventions has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of chief executive officers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of chief executive officers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of chief executive officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Broc (talk) 12:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)