User talk:AnthonyFair

Welcome
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Nate1481(t/c) 09:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Political parties
'That have been able to find' is not a fair standard, also do you propose to link to all local organisation on all pages about settlements? I dissagree that political parties are relevent. Linking to the council or a local MP I would agree with but this would belong on an articles titled Politics in Wimbledon etc --Nate1481(t/c) 11:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC) p.s. sorry I was writing this response and hadn't saved it.
 * I'd support linking to the Merton-connect page, as it covers all of the current ones and isn't directly promoting any of them --Nate1481(t/c) 11:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Anthony. The reason I deleted the links that you added was that they only covered one party. As Nate1481 has already stated, wikipedia aims for a neutral point of view and a link to just one party is not neutral and could be seen as promoting one political agenda in preference to others. I personally don't think that there is a need for links to political parties to be present in the borough article. To improve the NPOV for the Wimbledon (UK Parliament constituency) article, I have added a link to the sitting MP's site and converted the links that you added to references. We thus have references for candidates for the three largest political parties - this though could become an untidy mess, and distract from the main thrust of the article, if multiple links to all parties are added and should that happen I will probably delete them all. --DavidCane (talk) 23:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hi, I note the chairman of your local Liberal Democrats has the name "Anthony Fairclough" and you've promoted their site here and have edited a significant number of Lib Dem articles: http://www.mertonlibdems.org.uk/contact-us-mainmenu-3/12-contacts/4--anthony-fairclough.html

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--Shakehandsman (talk) 03:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The conflict of interest policy is not contrevened by my contributions on Liberal Democrat-related articles, and your assertion that I have "promoted" the website of the local Liberal Democrats is simply not true.AnthonyFair (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I should also add that I am broadly identifiable by my Wikipedia ID (AnthonyFair), which makes my contributions more transparent than your own. AnthonyFair (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MHP Communications


A tag has been placed on MHP Communications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball  Watcher  22:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agents' Mutual Ltd


A tag has been placed on Agents' Mutual Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agents' Mutual Ltd


A tag has been placed on Agents' Mutual Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ukexpat (talk) 15:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rich Riley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rich Riley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rich Riley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)