User talk:AnthonyGrant1789

January 2017
Hello, I'm Thompson.matthew. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evgeny Lebedev have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Matthew Thompson talk to me! 18:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lucy Aharish— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to David Muir has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: David Muir was changed by AnthonyGrant1789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972072 on 2017-11-08T23:44:23+00:00.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Barry Diller, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Your edit to Barry Diller violated our policy on biographies of living people. The defunct website Gawker is not and never has been a reliable source. It was a self-admitted gossip site without a reputation for accuracy. Never, ever, ever add gossip to a Wikipedia article. Consider this a formal warning. Any more violations of BLP policy may well result in a block. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. You continued with your BLP violations even after being warned. Therefore, I have blocked you indefinitely. In order to be unblocked, you need to explain what you did wrong, show evidence that you understand BLP policy, and pledge to never violate BLP policy again. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)