User talk:AnthonyJ Lock/Archive 1

Republic Records & Johnathan Miller
AnthonyJ Lock, I had removed that section from Republic Records because I am Johnathan Miller. A family member put that up there and did not know what he was doing! So, I took the initiative to remove that false mess!! If you will, be kind and remove that. I did write some songs with Walter Afanasieff, and I am signed with a record label...just not with Repulic or Universal Republic. Thank You.. JM 2001:5B0:2DFF:2EF0:0:0:0:3B (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Johnathan R. Miller2001:5B0:2DFF:2EF0:0:0:0:3B (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Oreimo
Hello, and first let me welcome you to Wikipedia. Now then, regarding Oreimo, the article is currently having a requested move discussion, Talk:Ore no Imōto ga Konna ni Kawaii Wake ga Nai to change the title to simply Oreimo, and it's likely this will happen sometime soon based on the support it's already received. However, let me also point out that the reason the title has been rendered as Ore no Imōto ga Konna ni Kawaii Wake ga Nai is based on the modified Hepburn romanization of the title, which is the preferred romanization of Japanese script on Wikipedia; see WP:MOS-JP; so "imouto" becomes Imōto per point one at WP:MOS-JP, and "ni" is kept separate from "konna" because it is accepted that particles traditionally remain separate from other words when romanizing Japanese. Furthermore, this is not considered a reliable source since it's the encyclopedia part of ANN; the news and review side to the website is, however, considered reliable.--  十  八  11:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of the current discussion going on and have removed my move request due to that. Thank you for all the information regarding romanization of Japanese I was unaware that particles were kept separate from other words when romanizing japanese. Also thanks for the welcome. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Apathy". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 07:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. I was a little hesitant to do so because of your lack of use of edit summaries as well as your involvement in a "dispute" over WP:FUCK. Just so we are clear, you can only use rollback to revert clear vandalism--in cases such as those at WP:FUCK, you should undo the other person's edit with a clear reason in the edit summary.

Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 04:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits (sorry to repeat myself, but this is very important).
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

Removed content
Hi Anthony

I created the page for a somoone since he doesnt know but he said he wants to go through the information again.. since i am new to wikipedia i didnt realize that l'd not have reomoved tge info just like that.

I have another request.. Since i am not eligible to rename the title of that page(he wants it as Aeon) but there is something non-person related page with the same title-- is it possible or its not allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.214.31.32 (talk) 10:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry could you rephrase that for me? did your friend create the page located at User:Amisha.infotech/Liam_Brian_Bell? or have I just completely missed the point of what you said? AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 10:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Christopher Miles
Dear Anthony,

The film director Christopher Miles is a client of mine. After the matter of an incorrect image on the Priest of Love page which was the cause of litigation between several parties, which one of your colleagues kindly helped me to resolve earlier this month, his interest has turned to other information held about him and his works. He has commissioned me to work with him on correcting a number of issues which he has asked me to put right for him and I put several hours work into the matter yesterday correcting his personal biography in a manner which was non-personal and factually accurate and supported by quoting the sources of the information where appropriate with further amendments to follow today concerning his career. Overnight virtually all my work has been deleted by what appears to be an automated system and yourself and posted a note accusing me of vandalism!!! I have more information to go up today about his career followed by much more over the coming weeks about his many works, but how can I charge him for my time if my work is undone like this?

The only person who really knows the truth about someone's life id that person and he had found many errors, particularly concerning his career which he asked me to delete because of the number of them and he would send me a correct version over night, which he has, and I am to replace this morning. But I can see little point if it is going to be reverted when I do.

I hope you can help me or advise me.

Regards

Adrian MCS 09:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manor Cottage Studios (talk • contribs)


 * Personally I wont revert any edits from you from now on, I recommend you to put something on your talk page alerting people that you were asked by christopher miles to edit information relating to x (x being whatever you were asked to edit) so that when people revert your changes they will see that and undo their reverts, I also recommend you to contact an administrator or someone who manages CluebotNG with any information pertaining to this issue to have your edits not be automatically reverted by the bot. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for that Anthony, forgive my somewhat frosty message earlier and thank you for your advice. After the work I put in yesterday, logging in this morning and seeing it all gone again rather upset me. I hope you understand. MCS 10:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manor Cottage Studios (talk • contribs)


 * Not a problem there mate, also remember to end your posts with ~ as that signs your account name, date and time. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Apologies as well
didn't mean to sound so harsh :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * why's everybody a "mate" w/ you guys ?... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

IP warning
Just a heads-up, I removed your L3 warning on User talk:203.90.70.251 because the one I posted was for the same edit(s) you reverted. SpecMode (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Tk Pk
Well now I just have to go back and delete the content again...I appreciate your note about adding why I edit content for future. For your reference, it was because it was an excrutiatingly long page that Wikipedia wanted cleaned up, especially with more citations. Much of the content was overly descriptive and some could not be cited without directing to the same page over and over again, hence a bit unnecessary. Thanks, but if you preemptively revert my edits again, we will have issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.232 (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it's 3am here, and I was only going to the page to check one fact and found it to be so excessive I couldn't let it be. Much of my anger was at whatever strange person living near me thought it important to include every minute detail possible. I'm re-doing it because you're genuinely right about the leaving an edit summary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.232 (talk) 07:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Jerry Augustyniak
Hi, the majority of the albums of 10,000 Maniacs have all listed the name Jerome Augustyniak's name as Jerome, not Jerry. Jerry is more of the name friends call him, but its always been Jerome. Citations on this is the linear notes of The Wishing Chair, In My Tribe, Blind Man's Zoo, Hope Chest, Out Time In Eden, Love Among The Ruins, The Earth Pressed Flat and Music From The Motion Picture. As well as the John & Mary albums Victory Gardens, The Weedkiller's Daughter, Pinwheel Galaxy, and Peace Bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.43.173.179 (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, my name is Paulina Angel, I've made the comment up a head. I also know members of the band and is one of the top historians.PaulinaAngel (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)PaulinaAngel

An exception
FYI While is very understandable, there is a huge backstory (see here for my message). I suggest just leaving it alone for now as it certainly is not a routine vandalism matter. Johnuniq (talk) 10:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Cascade Christian High School
I go to Cascade Christian High School and this school is NOT in Oregon. I am changing the page to put the correct school up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.176.216 (talk) 08:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see the page located at this url Cascade Christian High School which shows that the school in question is located in Medford, OR AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Brad Lloyd
The page you edited recently regarding Brad Lloyd Fan has nothing to do with your football player. If you feel the need to share some pointless information (as I acknowledge our page does as well) about some football player most people outside of Australia have probably never heard of create your frickin page man as we did. Don't be lazy and stop referring to my revisions as "unconstructive" just because you don't deem the information important enough to publish on Wikipedia. It's open source you fool, that's what it's for Hugs and kisses, Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.245.224.168 (talk) 08:18, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The fact of the matter is mate, your edits constitute vandalism. Simple as that, you're removing a page and replacing it with some rubbish about a Facebook group, please stop making nonconstructive edits such as that to Wikipedia, thanks. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, the "fact" that you mentioned is not in fact a fact but an opinion. First of all, I did not create the page, I merely reverted back to it's originally intended state and then you guys come along and decide some football player is somehow more important than the crap we're posting. It's all nonsense or "rubbish" as you pretentious wankers like to say on the other side of the world. Leave it be and create your own little football player love page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.245.224.168 (talk) 05:31 EST ARG, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Originally intended state? please see page creation located here which has absolutely no mention of a Facebook page. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

reverts to my sandbox
Hi, I see what happened now. I was working on my sandbox from a computer I don't usually use, and had not logged in. With the best intentions, you reverted my changes, and I don't see an easy way to get them back. Can you revert back for me? Again, sorry for the misunderstanding. Things move fast on wikipedia these days. FourTildes 08:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * All good now mate, just a tip you can hit the undo button next to edits you wish to undo, save changes and you're all good. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

No, I was in the middle of an edit and I lost some stuff, and I realized I can't get it back. I thought for a second you could, now I realize what happened. It's okay I'll redo it. I should've been more careful - and I am glad to see wikipedia is getting this responsive. FourTildes 08:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah well that sucks mate, I wish I was able to help you any. Good luck. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)