User talk:AnthonyJohn07

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydrocupration has been accepted
 Hydrocupration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Hydrocupration help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Here's the drill
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so the references tend to be general, i.e., reviews and books. See WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY. Wikipedia has no interest in being current in the literature: WP:NOTNEWS. If you consult the Chem Manual of Style, you can learn some things about publishing graphics. We avoid words in graphics, that way other language wiki's can use your same graphics without being stuck with a bunch of English. We use the captions to explain things. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)