User talk:AnthonyLudwar/sandbox

Rylie's Peer Review
Your lead section is a very strong introduction to the topic. It gives a good overview of the topic, but doesn't go into too much detail. This is a good start to your article. I also liked the structure of your outline. I thought it was easy to follow and well thought out. The table that you used worked very well because things were easy to find and understand. I think your article is very well balanced. It seems like all of the sections are a good length and contribute to the article. It is very clear that one source does not dominate your article and you pull information from a wide variety of sources. Great work! I did not notice any biases while reading your article. I thought you did a nice job of staying neutral and presenting the data as it is. Last, you did a nice job of finding reliable sources. Many of your sources are accredited and scholarly from peer reviewed journals. Overall you did a made a great contribution to Wikipedia and I think that the information you added will be beneficial to people all over the world. I do have one suggestion and that is to maybe add global information. It looked to me like all of your information was focused on the history of architectural engineering in the US, so maybe just add a section about the impact of architectural engineering world-wide. Again, great job on your article! Rylienicolee (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Rylie