User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2008/January-March

Oxyhydrogen

 * I'm not that amused of your revert. Both the part the you've reverted back in are of dubious value, see the article talk page. --Pjacobi (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Magnecule

 * And the magnecules? Articles for deletion/Magnecular bond determined, that concepts only existing in one person's theory are better to be mentioned in the biography page alone.
 * Note that I'm aware of a number of counterarguments (some good, some bad, as so often) and that Time Cube and New Chronology got their own page -- but magnecules? With less than 500 Google hits and no coverage anywhere?
 * --Pjacobi (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I have merged Magnecule into Ruggero Santilli. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! --Pjacobi (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you
Sorry to bother you, but can you please do me the favor of deleting all of the old revisions of Image:Squishy_Vic.jpg? I am finally satisfied with the current image. Please and thank you. -- Victor  (talk)  10:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Miss BG
You should upload back Miss BG show on wikipedia.

you should upload Miss BG article back to wikipedia. It is a television show not a band. Someone in wikipedia will help you fix things up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbears22 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

knit stitch

 * Please can you undo the redirect on this page. Thanks.This is the text I wanted to add to the page knit stitch:

The best way to learn the basic methods of knitting is to be shown by a more experienced knitter. If you do not have access to somebody to show you, the following instructions may be helpful.

Hold your knitting in your left hand, with the empty knitting needle in the right hand. Slide your right hand needle into the first loop. Just the tip needs to go through.

Wrap your yarn around the tip of the right hand needle so that it rests between the two needles.

Using the right hand needle catch this yarn and pull it down, forming a new loop on your right hand needle.

Pull the old loop off the left hand needle. 15:18, 10 January 2008 User:Newbohemianknitwear


 * Knitting contains several links to external sites that tell people how to knit. Wikipedia has a rule against instructional content. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Forchheim
Hi, you commented on my proposed move of "Forchheim (Oberfranken)" to "Forchheim". My arguments for this move are:
 * primary topic (it's much larger than the other Forchheims, the article name in German wikipedia is also de:Forchheim)
 * the "(Oberfranken)" part is not commonly used (neither in English nor in German) when referring to Forchheim AFAIK
 * unusual disambiguation method: Oberfranken is Upper Franconia in English, and we use commas for disambiguation, see WikiProject Germany/Conventions

I'm not sure how to proceed now, because the move has already been made. If you're not too discontented with the present situation, could you remove the entry from the WP:RM page? Markussep Talk 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

NHIS merge

 * Could you please history merge New Hampshire International Speedway into New Hampshire Motor Speedway. It was cut/pase moved a few weeks ago. Thanks -- Cmjc80 (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Truxedo
Thank you for taking the time to notify me, as I requested. The user who nominated Truxedo for Speedy Deletion failed to do so, and I appreciate it.Wikilost (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here. --User: (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Article Deletion
Dear Anthony, I noticed that you deleted an article about groove advertising company, though i haven't included any advertising information...i was just writing some introduction about the company..when it was founded...and some other info like this. What i noticed is that the article was there for 5 days, and when i have put the logo of the company as a picture it got deleted immediately. Would you please explain to me why this happened as i am new here? i just put my link into a list of companies in egypt which has nothing wrong, and i created a page so that when people click this link they find some info about the company. So please let me know if there is anything i should put in mind while doing this, because i don't mean to do any advertising.

Regards, 196.201.26.6 (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)CreativeCopywriter196.201.26.6 (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you mean Groove Advertising And Marketing Solutions, I deleted it at 16:22, 10 January 2008 because at 16:09, 10 January 2008 User:Breno speedy-delete-tagged it as advertizing. There are untold thousands of advertizing and marketing firms in the world, and unless this firm can be proved to be very notable beyond most others and influencing things seriously in the outside world, I feel that if I undeleted this page and started an AfD debate on it, the verdict would be "delete". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Episodes vs. Media and release information

 * I noticed that you moved Rocko's Modern Life media and release information to Rocko's Modern Life episodes. I prefer the former title because the page ALSO covers the comic book - The page is supposed to document both. I also have the info about the VHS releases being added. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * At 05:27, 18 October 2007 I moved Rocko's Modern Life media and release information to List of Rocko's Modern Life episodes obeying a request in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=165344347#Uncontroversial_proposals: "Rocko's Modern Life media and release information → List of Rocko's Modern Life episodes — Per episode list standard -- User:Wikipedical 02:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corporation

 * This company is a large, public sector enterprise owned by the Government of India. It recorded aggregated revenues of over $340 million USD during fiscal 2006 and a link referencing the company's financial statements was included as an in-line reference in the article as well (It is also India's largest fertilizer plant - I believe this information was included in the article).  As far as WP:V, there are several results for a Google search  on the company.  I admit that there wasn't much content in the article, and I had already tagged it as a stub. None of the reasons listed in WP:CSD seem pertinent to this article. Moreover, it is common courtsey to allow the editor an opportunity to defend his/her creation of an article before deleting it.  I'd appreciate an explaination for why this article was deleted.  AreJay (talk) 00:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * At 08:23, 17 January 2008 User:Vegaswikian speedy-delete-tagged it "It is an article about a company, corporation, organization, or group that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * So someone just comes in and says that it was an article about a company that didn't "indicate the importance or significance of the subject" and that's it?? I don't get the opportunity to point out the text in the article that does indicate the company's importance? Seems unfair, not to say utterly illogical. I'm going to recreate this article. AreJay (talk) 13:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you find another speedy-delete tag in this article, you can insert " " (without quotes) to tell the administrators to wait while you work on the article. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks AreJay (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Black Gold Energy

 * It appears you deleted my entry for Black Gold Energy. This company is doing some very unique things and is applying new science methods that was going to be included into the article with time. TGS-Nopec a company that Black Gold Energy is dealing with a lot has a Wikipedia entry and so I am wondering why this entry was deleted so quickly. Thank you. 02:52 & 02:53, 18 January 2008 User:Lrothenberg
 * At 09:27, 17 January 2008 User:Pairadox speedy-delete-tagged it as "not notable". When the information describing the "new science methods" is available, and the article can be big enough to be noteworthy and not like merely a company announcement, then it could be re-started. See the rules about advertizing on Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard. (talk) 09:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Oxyhydrogen
I am done with the Oxyhydrogen article for now. I have exhausted the references I have in my possession. There is a lot more, but it costs almost 16 bucks per journal from the SAE, and coexisting publishers. Noah Seidman (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I ordered some new articles. Most of the info is more relevant to Hydrogen fuel enhancement, therefore Oxyhydrogen is just receiving wikification, alignment, and some minor adjustments here and there. Noah Seidman (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Champagne Salon

 * Did you read the talk page before deleting this article? I asserted the champagne's notability and was in the middle preparing to stub-ify it and rewrite; I requested the help of Wikipedia's most prolific wine article editor, someone who has helped me many times in the past.  Can you restore (not even userfy, just restore) and I will remove all promotional language within a matter of minutes.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 09:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article Champagne Salon largely consisted of advertizing champagne wine, without saying anything constructive that is not better explained in page Champagne (wine) and the pages that Champagne (wine) links to. Removing the promotional matter would merely leave "Champagne Salon is a wine dealers." and its web address. I could undelete and AfD page Champagne Salon, but the verdict would almosrt certainly be "delete". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please, please do undelete and list on AfD. You can expect a complete rewrite. On a side note, I think deleting the article without responding to my "hangon" and talk page request--and allowing me almost zero time to do what I promised to do--was a tad impolite. I hope it's clear, btw, that I didn't write the spammy article and agree that its current state is utter crap; I'm just interested in the champagne (I've read about it in several wine magazines and newspapers) and think it deserves an article.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 09:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it (Articles for deletion/Champagne Salon); but note WP:NN and WP:SPAM etc. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll do what I can to clean it up and will try to produce references from Wine Specator or some such.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 10:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Ear Clearing

 * Hi Anthony - as you seem to be the originator of both articles Clearing the ears and Ear clearing, would you agree that they are best merged? I suggested Clearing the ears should redirect to Ear clearing, but I'd be happy to defer to your judgement. Both articles are tagged for sources, so I'll make a start on citing some references as soon as I know which one to work on. RexxS (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Anthony - I just spotted your addition to Diving_hazards_and_precautions and agree that it needed clarification. However, it seems that it reads in a way that you may not have intended: there is now a row that gives "Eardrum bursting inwards" caused by "Blocked Eustachian tube", for which I can't construct a mechanism when it can occur on ascent. Could you have another look when you get the chance and see if a further edit would clear that up, perhaps to give the result you originally intended? RexxS (talk) 14:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Corrected. Sorry. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For taking the iniatitive to fix the history pages for Hafrada. It's very much appreciated.  T i a m u t talk 13:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion on 23 Jan 2008

 * 23 January 2008 I created a article on a computer game and it was deleted when I got home and it had nothing to do with the reason it was posted for I put hangon on but I did'nt know that does'nt work on speedy deleteion now what?Yuir (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Yuir
 * If, as seems, the deleted page was Rembrandt & kids, it is clearly not notable: see WP:NN. Its log says that it has been deleted 4 times, by:-
 * 01:15, 24 January 2008 Dlohcierekim (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Rembrandt & kids" ‎ (CSD G1: Patent nonsense)
 * 21:48, 23 January 2008 J-stan (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Rembrandt & kids" ‎ (CSD A3: No meaningful content)
 * 21:39, 23 January 2008 Gogo Dodo (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Rembrandt & kids" ‎ (CSD G6: Housekeeping)
 * 16:40, 23 January 2008 Anthony Appleyard (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Rembrandt & kids" ‎ (content was: '{{db-bio} }...')
 * Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Balance (accounting)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Balance (accounting), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical Prophecy Fulfilled
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Articles for deletion/Biblical Prophecy Fulfilled, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank You for Edits
Appreciate the formating you are doing on 3D's.Granite07 (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

KKK (disambiguation)
Hello Anthony, I've noticed that you reverted three changes to the KKK (disambiguation) page. I'm wondering if this was an accident and whether you had a proper chance to review the diff first. The three changes were: Once again, thank you for enthusiasm and contributions to Wikipedia. —Sladen (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Linking to International Air Transport Association airport code for "3-letter airport code".
 * 2) Adding the KKK-supermarket brand (run by the Kesko chain, which is common within Finland. (And a constant amusement for foreigners)...
 * 3) Removing what appears to be an unsuitable link to "http://www.falconclubs.fsnet.co.uk/KKK%20Scotland.htm" (A supplier of day-old, ex-egg industry baby chickens) to the falconry industry.
 * I restored the Finnish shop meaning. The other two meanings were there already. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent, thanks for creating the new sub-section too! —Sladen (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I've reverted the merge of Slavomacedonian as the term is not only used to refer to the Slavic speaking minority in northern Greece, but also used by some to refer to the ethnic Macedonians of the Republic of Macedonia. - Francis Tyers · 12:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Taillez
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Taillez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Complicated history merge

 * I'm not sure if this is possible, but I was wondering if you'd be able to fix this. On Feb 10/11 2007 Windows Live Mail was c&p moved to what is now Hotmail.  The problem is Windows Live Mail Desktop was c&p moved to Windows Live Mail on May 7 2007.  Now the Windows Live Mail history is actually the split history of two different pages.  Thanks for looking into this.  -- Cmjc80 (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reunited these split histories at Hotmail and Windows Live Mail Desktop and their talk pages. Windows Live Mail is now a disambig between them. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmjc80 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Mohamed ahmed dirir hewalbin: No assertion of notability?

 * "Anthony Appleyard deleted "Mohamed ahmed dirir hewalbin" ‎ (content was: '{{db-bio} } mohamed ahmed dirir hewalbin, warsangeli,reersalah, prominent Somali poet and scholar one of the welknown poeters in somalia')"

Just because he's not on Google doesn't mean he doesn't exist. That article's author does appear to have knowledge of Somalia, and his problems with spelling and capitalization mean his contribs need to be cleaned up, not deleted. I already rescued Reer Saalax from the clutches of speedy deletion... how many other contributions have we thrown away? &lt;eleland/talkedits&gt; 07:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please provide references describing him; then the article could be rewritten. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

thank you
for moving the page :) Crystalclearchanges (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Ahmed Arabi

 * I see you prefer Arabi Pasha. There is a strong case for that; but it is complicated by our treatment of noble titles in Egypt and elsewhere.
 * But since we all agree on Arabi, would you consent to make an uncontested move to Ahmed Arabi and then a full WP:RM discussion of whether it should then move somewhere else? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I put the title up for discussion; I'm not convinced either way yet, but if you want to weigh in at Talk:Ahmed Arabi, I'll read with interest. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It appears that a dissentient has shown up, and moved it first to Ahmed Orabi and then to Ahmed 'Urabi, without discussion. I undid the second move, but can't undo the first. Can you move it back, so that we can have a proper move discussion? (From the present consensus on the talk page I don't think this will go far, but one never knows.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Anthony! Please do not move the page pending the discussion. Thank you. — Zerida 22:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops too late! I made the move before Zerida posted his message. (See Talk:Ahmed_Orabi.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Move request: white privilege
I listed a move request here to move white privilege (sociology) to white privilege. I noticed that nobody has commented on it, let alone acted upon it. Did I screw up in how I listed it? Just wanted to understand the process a little better. Thanks in advance, Profepstein (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Shiva/Siva dab pages

 * Recently, I found that entering "Shiva" led to a page on a Hindu diety. Being Jewish, I recognize the word "Shiva" as being ritual mourning, and I feel it has equal importance on a world scale. I thought it would be best to have the entry of "Shiva" go straight to the disambiguation page for the term.
 * After finding the disambiguation page, I found that it included both "Shiva" and "Siva." I thought that following Wikipedia tradition, it would be better to have a separate page dedicated to each spelling, with a "see also" to the other, so I split the page.
 * Do you agree this is best?Xyz7890 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I reverted Shiva (disambiguation) to the redirect. In Hinduism, the spellings "Siva" and "Shiva" frequently interchange. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I moved Siva (disambiguation) to Shiva (disambiguation), as it has about twice as many entries Sh- as entries S-. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I moved the Hindu god back to plain Shiva, as dozens of incoming pointers expect it to be there. I started a discussion about the move, in Talk:Shiva. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Page moves
Thanks for your message, Anthony. However, I can't do these myself as I don't want to register an account (for reasons that I'm not going to go into here...) and unregistered users can't carry out page moves. That's why I listed these at "requested moves". 81.159.18.71 (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Emperor Fushimi
Would you be willing to discuss your recent edit of Emperor Fushimi? Will you take a moment to explain why you think your edit enhances the effectiveness and utility of the note? In one sense, the answer would seem obvious; but I wondered if your take on this will have been be entirely congruent with mine. This becomes more than a merely rhetorical question because I have created similarly-formatted notes in other articles like Emperor Go-Fukakusa. I'm asking for feedback, not so much because I'm convinced you were "wrong," but rather because I'm not sure I was "wrong." --Ooperhoofd (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Links from some words, e.g. "kanji".
 * "Roman-alphabet spelling": to distinguish from Japanese spelling.
 * Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggested improvement. I edited Emperor Go-Fukakusa accordingly.  My question was unclear, but if you re-visit Emperor Fushimi you'll better appreciate what I'm asking about.  The notice does stand out from the text a little better, but it's a bit awkward-looking.  I think this deliberately "wrong" format appears more clearly to be a helpful comment.  What I'm wondering about is your perspective here.  Why is the "corrected" format better in this instance?  Do you see my point? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I have restored my version. Putting the text in the other typeface in a box is over-emphasis such as would normally be given to a hazard warning or suchlike. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * As long as we're fiddling with this, what do you think of the indented note format -- maintaining the conventional typeface, but using indentation to set off the informational note from the body of text? See Emperor Fushimi, Emperor Go-Fukakusa, Prince Hisahito of Akishino and Emperor Sutoku. FYI: I'm fairly certain that there are only the three sets of paired names, but I'll probably plan to use the same format device if something like this should come up in some other setting. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Seems OK to me. But I have cured some "do-it-yourself" line-division: do not assume that everybody is looking at the page with the same or more possible characters per full line of text. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Good -- thanks for working with me on this. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Eponymous diseases
Just to let you know that trend (apparently) is nolonger to use posessive "'s" on eponymous diseases. Hence Graves did not have any thyroid disease so not "Graves' disease" but "Graves disease". That said, I'm struggling at the moment to locate the history links to past discussion on this, I'll start a thread at WT:MED (medical wikiproject). David Ruben Talk 01:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

ante covic

 * Why move his page? Jared Wiltshire (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Requested by User:Chanheigeorge at 22:21, 11 February 2008 in . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD closings
Hey there A.A. I recently was corrected in my own closings of AfDs and I noticed that you've been making the same mistake that I made several times. (too many to count :-) When you close an AfD, make sure that the  is at the absolute top of the page (not just in place of where it says "remove this notice when closing}.  If it's not at the top, the formatting is wrong and the bot (mathbot, I believe) does not remove the AfD properly from the logs.  I've just fixed a couple of your recent closes (see this diff and this one.  Also, I added your User name, please remember to use 4 tildes after the subst:at line.  Cheers,   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Category:Visitor attractions in Orlando, Florida
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Visitor attractions in Orlando, Florida. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Cuvee move
Thanks for moving cuvee to the more correctly accented cuvée, according to my request! Tomas e (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Rubric

 * Please reverse this - there is a move request in place to move Rubric (typography) to Rubric. You will also see you merged the wrong version.   You'd better leave Rubric as a redirect to Rubric (typography) this time, pending the move request - or ideally do that. You weren't trying to process the move request were you? Johnbod (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Rubric (typography) for the rest of this discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Nine Years War
Thanks Anthony for that move. Much appreciated. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Yatra
An editor has nominated Yatra, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

53rd Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry
Right before you deleted 53rd Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry I removed the CSD template, because it is not a copyvio. If you check the source website, you'll see the text comes from a book published in 1868. It's not likely to be a copyright violation, and it should probably be restored. Natalie (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Natalie (talk) 23:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

History split?

 * Hello. I'm contacting you because of your expertise at WP:SPLICE. Is it possible to split the history of a page into two separate articles? An editor overwrote an archived AFD discussion at Articles for deletion/Frances Bean Cobain (2nd nomination) (diff). The article history from 06:50, 25 February 2008 onward needs to be split off to a separate page Articles for deletion/Frances Bean Cobain (3rd nomination), and Articles for deletion/Frances Bean Cobain (2nd nomination) reverted back to the archived version at 20:30, 5 December 2007. Is this possible? If so, your attention to this page would be appreciated. Thanks and regards. --Muchness (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Yatra

 * Hi Anthony, I don't know how much you know about Hinduism, but to my knowledge (as a non-practising Hindu) 'yatra' is the journey to pilgrim spots, somewhat comparable the Islamic hajj, not the destinations themselves (comparable to Mecca, I suppose). I have some resources available on the topic, do you mind if I do some rewriting to make the meaning clearer? ~ Riana ⁂ 06:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Edit the page as you like. Editing during AfD is allowed (but not blanking or deleting etc.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Iconography

 * If you have a moment, as a result of an ancient amateur merge, the talk page for this article is Talk:Iconology, as a result of criss-crossing redirects. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 21:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have moved Talk:Iconology to Talk:Iconography. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 22:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Panlucism
--Necipf (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Anthony, I don't know how much you know about Panlucism, but according to me the deletion of the page I was writting is a real lack of respect for my own religion. That's why I please you to let me keep on writing it. I hope you understand my point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Necipf (talk • contribs) 23:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The deleted page is Panlucist. Google search for panlucism OR panlucist OR panlucists yielded absolute zero results. Google search for "Ka Ohren" yielded 6 results, all in German, where it referred not to a man but to ears ("Ohren" in German). If Panlucism exists, it seems to have so few followers that it can safely be classified as WP:NN. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Octans image
I have uploaded a picture I created by editing your picture of Octans. Both pictures appear on the Sigma Octantis page. If you object to my appropriation of your work, or think that it needs to be tidied up let me know. Otherwise, thanks for the original image. Conrad Leviston (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Law enforcement in Canada
I am not sure if you were the one who had this on the law enforcement page. "There are also a few private police forces, with the same powers as other governmental forces." I am wondering if you can explain what that means.
 * Hi,
 * For example, the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Police Service is also a transit police force but regulated under the Police Act (BC), whereas CN Police and CPR Police are regulated under Section 158 of the Canada Transportation Act . what difference does it make since they are appointed by the Minister of Public Safety so they are not really private police force?

--Cahk (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I likely split the abovementioned text off some page, taking it at face value as accurate, and subsequent page moves by various people have confused the issue. It seems now that I better leave this to someone who knows more about Canadian police. I am in England. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, hey I want to thank you for making a Siege of Sardis (546 BC) page, I have been waiting for a long time, so thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariobarza (talk • contribs) 00:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Is there any justice left? Is this a fashi?
I ask for your help sir to evaluate what happened at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Asia_%28band%29 I am the President of the authorized Fan club (asiafanclub.com) for the band ASIA. For a long time my link was in the external links section of the wiki article. A few weeks ago I noticed that my link was moved to the bottom the external links section by 2 newer links. Feeling this unjustified, going by a first come first serve basis, I moved it back to the #2 slot in the external links section. My link was removed by an IP address of 156.34.225.77 and an edit war broke out, & for one hour of this war only my link was removed.

Now the situation has blown up and before the administrators seen what really happened and how it started and why, they had already made their call on lies and deception. My link was removed I was blacklisted. Sir, I ask that you please evaluate the wiki policy for external links. These rules were clearly detailed by Bondegezou and those facts were never really rebuttaled by the opposition, they were quick broad responses without thouching upon the issues in detail. He pointed these facts as to what links should be included, this goes well beyond an official site.

Bondegezou stated... '''"Hu12 raises the issue of what he calls "obvious" spamming. Under WP:AGF, I accept the explanation given below by the Asia Fan Club President as to what happened. Regardless of that, the inappropriate activities of certain editors is completely irrelevant to the merits of the case. The link concerned was in this article for a long time before the recent edit war erupted and content should never be chosen to punish editors' behaviour. The issue must be decided in terms of what is best for the article. A. B. and Hu12 raise WP:RS and WP:V, but WP:EL is the more relevant policy here, not those. This is not about using the link concerned as a citation, but giving it in the external links section. At the beginning of WP:EL, it states under "What should be linked" that, "1. Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any." An officially authorised fan club seems to me to constitute an official site. WP:EL goes on, "4. Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews." The site in question contains such content. If one is concerned about WP:RS policy, I note that WP:EL continues under "Links to be considered", "4. Sites which fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources." That is, even if a site fails WP:RS, it may still be considered. Taking that in conjunction with the site's official status seems to me a sufficient case for the link's inclusion. WP:EL then continues with a list of "Links normally to be avoided". The site in question does not appear to fall under any of the categories listed. A. B. suggests above that the site does fall under criteria 1, 11 and 12. With respect to 1, the site clearly contains considerable content beyond what a good Wikipedia article would ever include. I do not see how 11 applies at all. 12 reads "Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority." Given this site has been authorised by the band in question, that would seem to come under "except those written by a recognized authority". Nor is it a blog or simply a personal web page. Bondegezou (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)'''

The mistake I made was I engaged in an edit war and people got upset. For a long time my link was in the external links section of the wiki article. 156.34.226.160 continued on and my site that is an authorized site for ASIA was placed it on the blacklist as spam. It has also come between a private SE program I have with Google that I paid money for. This is clearly deformation of my site, myself and ASIA's authorized online fan club. 156.34.225.77 continued to write editors and people to take his side. Finally as you can see the evidence for yourself, it was proven that my link is an ASIA authorized Internet resource. I am an official authorized affiliate to report official ASIA news, photos, & all media sources. My site IT'S NOT SIMPLY A BLOG or a forum, and contains interviews reviews (official) and other valuable information that would not be included in a wiki article such as tour photos exclusive to the fan club and other interviews and reviews approved for my site. According to Wiki policy, that is to be included in the external links section.

156.34.225.77 lied to administrators and told them I was adding spam (to give the impression that I suddenly added the link that day) in reality, he got pissed that I moved my link to where it was for a long time, in the #2 spot. I didn't add anything, in reality it was he that removed it and then lied to administrators, by the time the real story came out, it was blown up, hell had already broken loose, & the administrators already made their call (like an umpire not changing). He started the whole thing, reqruited the administrators, now wants to free himself of all involvement and leave those he requited to take the heat when I bring the truth of this out and turned the heat up when I said I was taking this further.

Look at what 156.34.225.77 said here (still calling me spam) '''"I am sorry to interrupt this convo but since several of you are involved in the issues going on at the Asia page I thought I would interject a personal concern here where several eyes could pick up on it... rather than chase each of you down individually. It's nothing major... unless you're me... but on the Asia talk page there is a very lengthy list of IPs that are being linked to the ongoing spam push by the Asia Fan Club President. The problem is... and this is my concern... one of my IPs (a noble 156.34.X range) is listed among the many IPs that have been used by the AFC Pres. Trust me... the FC pres does not live in Eastern Canada :D . I was going to rm it myself but then I thought... "there just ain't enough edit summary space to properly clarify the reason for its removal". I didn't want to look like I was hiding something :D. Could one of you be so kind as to clear my trustworthy IP range from any connections with the AFC pres and all his woeful pain and suffering apparently caused by Wikipedia. I just want me number back eh? :D. Have a nice day! 'Libs' 156.34.226.160 (talk) 02:10, 28 February 2008(UTC)"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:A._B.'''

Whats funny is they can't see through it and they continue to take his side and edited his IP out of my statements, 156.34.225.77 now wants to wash his hands clean of this. I was no angel in my response to this, I should not engaged in a war and should have wrote the administrators right away and said he vandalized a long time link, & this would have never happened. I ask you to please look at the guidelines of the wiki policy (external links) and see how many unuthorized links are on band pages because relevant material, my site is authorized and is in the official biography. It contain reviews interviews and photos that the article speaks that can't be included in the article, according to wiki own rules, that is relevant. I was banned by AB until 3/23 because of sock puppetry/Modrago, and BTW... turns out I was wronfully accused and wrongfully banned. See the evidence here, I was cleared.

"Unrelated - bizarrely, Mondrago (talk) is actually unrelated to the above IPs and geolocates elsewhere by IP. I can detect no further IPs which have been spamming but from the list, it's clear that AO rangeblocking 4.238.124.0/24 will catch 90% of them - Alison ❤ 07:16, 13 February 2008(UTC) "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mondrago I always lived up to all my IPs and never pretended to be someone else, as I'm at 3 different PC during the day plus an iphone.

I was also accused of redirecting my site under a different, but I explained this "The redirect is clearly explained more than once above, as I was re-acting to a the removal of the blacklist by Cirland, since he removed it from the blacklist thought it was cleared to re-add but thought there was a glitch or it took time after the removal for the spam warning to lift, didn't know why a warning was still being issued when the site was re-added by cirland and myself when he said it was removed off the blacklist. So I thought it was OK to re-add the link regardless if the address was different.  See the evidence here "I've removed Asia fan club url from the spam blacklist. If there is consensus to add it, as there appears to be, then it should be possible to do so.

However, I'm not sure whether changing the blacklist takes immediate effect or whether it takes a few hours to take effect, so if it doesn't work straight away, try again later. CIreland (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Asia_%28band%29 You will notice that is when I readded the link under a different address. I was also accused of being self published, my site contains official news, official photos and interviews, how is it self published? Every charge AB tried to throw at me was rebuttled by me and never responded to since. I understand an administrator doesn't want to go against another, but please see what happened here for yourself, this was not right, and realize they made their decisions based on false information, and didn't want to change their call when the truth came forward.  Please judge this on why happened & before this all blew up and judge my links on it merits itself and not what mistakes I made after the fact. Sincerely Asia Fan Club Pres
 * This message was added by User:4.238.124.25 and User:4.238.124.40

Answer

 * For clarity, please split long messages into paragraphs.
 * Am I right in thinking that this dispute arose over the external links in Asia (band) about which links should be included and in what order? Other Wikipedia editors are allowed their opinions about which links to include and in what order.
 * If User:4.238.124.25 and User:4.238.124.40 are going to stay in the dispute for a long time, it would help if they signed on and got themselves usernames. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Re allegations of lying: it seems that a link may seem spammy to one user but not to another. Sometimes there is more than one opinion on a matter. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, he knew it wasn't spam, he was mad that I moved it in the external links section, and told them I added spam, he knew it wasn't, if he thought it was spam he would have removed the link a long time ago. Me moving the link to #2 is what triggered this, he got angry. He lied that he made it appear that I was adding a spam link that day... so the administrators believed him.  I didn't add anything, there are many progressive rock experts that are mad over this because they have worked on the article for a long time.  He removed my link when I re-arranged the external links order.  Mine was at #4, so I moved it back to #2, where it was before 2 newer link bumped mine to the bottom, I mean come on mine was there first, so when I moved it to #2, he removed my link entirely, not placing it at #4, he removed a long time link, so I kept adding it back to where it was and that was the edit war, he was removing it and I was repairing his vandalism.  But he wrote the administrators and told them I was adding spam, as to give the impression that I was adding something that day that was never there before.  Once the administrators found out what happened they had already blacklisted my site so no one can re-add it, and that interfered with a private SE program I have because Google picked up on the words spam attached to the website.  What order should the links be?  Don't really know, the official one should always be 1st, and in my opinion, who there next in line should be next...that was me, this is why I moved mine back to #2, it was there before the other two.  Once they found out the story they now wish to ban me on my actions after fact (not who was right in the edit war) and they exaggerated thing and threw a bunch of charges at me that happened after the edit war that I rebutted.  Charging me of self promotion?  It's a non profit site with official press release info, calling me spam when I spend hundreds a year out of my own pocket. Please remove my site asia fan club from the blacklist, that is not spam, it is an authorized non profit site. ASIA Fan Club Pres —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.238.124.116 (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please continue this discussion on page Talk:Asia (band). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Anthony there is nothing I can do hu12 banned my laptop after I contacted you he also banned me when I asked for a neutral opinion. He knows he is wrong and don't want to change like an umpire. Please help someone just responded and said that one...my link should have never been there to begin with 2... He said only the official site should be listed in the external links section. With regard to 1...look at bondegezou breakdown of the wiki policy concerning external links that went unanswered. With regard to 2... It's called external links not link for reason of relevant material that can't be included in the wiki article such as reviews interviews and photos of the tours mentioned in the article. He is probably going to ban this now my iPhone. I am banned from that page undee all my ip's Thanks. Asia pres 22:28, 8 March 2008 User:32.138.216.54
 * I see no point in continuing this discussion. If the links in question were deleted as spam, it was likely with good reason. The rule in Wikipedia is WP:NPOV, i.e. neutral point of view, and a fan group's opinion is not dominant over other people's opinion. Also, you do not help matters by your persistence in not signing your messages. To sign a message, type ~ after it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fan club sites are not the best citations, so go to the "External Links" section. Bearian (talk) 22:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC) it is an authorized site with exclusive content that is relevant to the article such as official reviews and photos that can't be included in the article if you research you will find this was called spam based on a lie.  This is an non profit management authorized site that is listed in the official biography. 32.140.14.99 (talk) 23:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Asia pres
 * In response to "If the links in question were deleted as spam, it was likely with good reason." - that's the whole problem, it wasn't with good reason. Several editors are clearly attempting to "punish" "Asia Pres" for his tactics in trying to have the link re-added, when it's been clearly argued on the discussion page of the article that it stands on its own merits as an official, authorized site. The link should be included, if, and only if, it's deemed worthy and relevant to be included in the article. But "AP" keeps bringing up reasons about protecting his investments and using ridiculous phrases like "first come first serve" in reference to justifying the link placement, that clearly give the "spamming" impression. But, again, judge the content on its own merits. --Shubopshadangalang (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Search through Asia (band) 's history list shows an edit war between User:70.167.100.82 and User:142.166.250.216 around 19:00, 1 February 2008 involving the link http: / / asiafanclub.com/ ASIA Fan Club.com - The Authorized ASIA Fan Club. If this is the much-disputed link in question, it seems to be rather advertisory, including a soundtrack of pop music (presumably by the band Asia); but from my experiences with external sites there seems to be no hard-and-fast boundary between "this is spam" and "this is NPOV information", but it seems to depend on such things as the ratio between (the amount of matter encouraging the reader to buy or sell things) and (the amount of accurate other and useful information). Some of the matter on that page and the pages that it links to, seems to be relevant, to ardent fans of pop music; but against that is "Asia pres"'s reaction to this link being deleted. As regards placement, the section Asia (band) seems to be so short that placement does not matter; but I feel that the group Asia's own official site links should come first, and any fan and other third-party links after them. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that the official site should come first this is why I had it moved to #2. Hu12 is bannig my ISPs everytime I ask an administrator for help on this issue he even deleted my posts from their talk pages but he didn't with you because you already seen it. If they were clear cut right and someone vandalized something then they would't care who looked at this case, but they know I have support and that I was right from the get go, so as said earlier they are trying to ban me based upon what came after the war, and not on the qualifications of the wiki external links guideline. This is going to be a very long drawn out case that is not going away because I'm right. They banned my home ISP for reason of being modrago, which I was officially cleared of being but my isp is still banned. Look at this case for what it is and let justice prevail. 32.137.154.103 (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)ASIA pres

Image:Dores-Inj-diag1_02.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dores-Inj-diag1_02.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 12:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Lower Fraser Valley ---> Fraser Valley
Thanks for your comments about this. I see your point about the blending of edit histories. As the former article was a stub (and largely incorrect, thus unsourced), I'm not sure whether it matters much. However, if you think I should list it at Cut and paste move repair holding pen, I will do so. Sunray (talk) 00:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. is prohibited for six months from making any edit to an article or project page related to a television episode or character that substantially amounts to a merge, redirect, deletion, or request for any of the preceding, to be interpreted broadly. However, he is free to contribute on the talk pages or to comment on any AfD, RfD, DRV, or similar discussion initiated by another editor, as appropriate. Enforcement of this remedy is specified here.

Furthermore, the parties are instructed to cease engaging in editorial conflict and to work collaboratively to develop a generally accepted and applicable approach to the articles in question, and are warned that the Committee will look very unfavorably on anyone attempting to further spread or inflame this dispute. Please also note that the temporary injunction enacted by the Committee on February 3 in relation to this case now ceases to be in effect.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 23:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Invite
Jccort (talk) 02:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

For Better or For Worse
Thoughts? --Ckatz chat spy  08:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Anthony: Sorry to bother you, but would you have any objections if I were to restore the article on the comic strip For Better or For Worse to For Better or For Worse? You've just moved it to For Better or for Worse per a request on the "Moves" page. That request was based on the guidelines for trademarks, but I think this is more appropriately classified as a title (as with a book or television series.) Per the MoS, "Book titles, like names of other works, are exempt from lowercase second and subsequent words."
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Kieran Hobbs
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kieran Hobbs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kieran Hobbs is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kieran Hobbs, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Samba Squad
they have been nominated for canada's highest music awards, they have won other awards in world music categories, VisionTV has made a two-hour documentary abou the band that has aired several times on Canadian and American television, etc..., etc... I looked at it last night, and it was there. I look this morning and it is gone. How do we go about reversing the deletion?
 * Hi... You speedily deleted the Samba Squad page, but I would like to request it to be undeleted. I was about to edit the page and add a whole bunch of criteria that would demonstrate the bands notability:

Thanks,

Josh Hehner --JHehner (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Slatecast
I just wanted to let you know that the primary editor of an article you speedy deleted under G11 has made it known that they are going to try to add links related to the website upon which the article was written throughout wikipedia. - I just wanted another pair of eyes on this to make sure the user doesn't intend to create linkspam for their website. Much appreciated.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Order Flowers
(Flowermania talk • contribs) 19:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello, Can you undelete my article on order flowers?  I put considerable time and effort writing that article trying to explain the nature of the florist industry to consumers.  I think I put valuable information on the pros and cons of ordering online and what the consumer is actually getting when they do.  If you really think it is an advertisement, I would prefer to have the article edited.  I think it was my usage of links.  I was only trying to make my article look as legit as possible.  Please undelete.  I believe my article should not have been deleted since it follows wikipedia's guidelines:
 * "When an article on an otherwise encyclopedic topic has the tone of an advertisement, the article can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view. Elements of articles about products or services with brand names can also be combined under a common topic or category to facilitate unbiased and collaborative information by including information about the competition and about different alternatives."
 * I have undeleted the last edit, with the company names removed, and moved it to Ordering flowers, as the gerund is the usual form for an article named after a verb. Also, many of the companies named are only in the USA and not in e.g. Britain where many Wikipedia readers live. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Airbourne (band) move

 * Hello, Anthony. I noticed you just moved the band article at WP:RM to the undisambiguated namespace. I think the move should be undone, and "Airbourne" needs to redirect to Airborne. I'm going to move it back to how it was, and redirect Airbourne appropriately. I just wanted to let you know if you were in the process of correcting double redirects or anything. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I did it by request from User:Random89 in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=198875647 . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I saw the request there myself, that's how I became aware of the issue. I just wanted to let you know what I did and why I did it. I also left a note on the band talk page, so they know why the move was overturned as well. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Network operations center
Thank you for the article move. Bankbryan (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Zil

 * Hi, is it possible to move the article from "finger cymbal" to "zill"? Because in fact, this is the real English spelling. Here is the proving link. Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 23:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I can make the move. If there will be any problems regarding that, you can take necessary actions. Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 23:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooops, I couldn't. I think I will be in need of your help to make the move. Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Chapultepec (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

WarCry

 * Anthony, I'm here to ask for your help on moving a band's name "WarCry (band)" to WarCry (This is a desambigution page), I know this might look meaningless to you, for the simple reason that there are some other articles with similar name, but these are kind of less important (Please don't take it the wrong way), one it's about a game, other it's about a website, the other one it's about a Salvation Army newspaper, and there are two more which their names have nothing to do with WarCry. But as you can see the newspaper article (Which, by the way it's called War Cry, instead of WarCry) is a little short, so are the other two. The disambiguation page it's named War cry, I think that the band's article, which is the largest one, should be named WarCry. Please help me merge this article into just WarCry.

As in Iron Maiden, there are several articles with that name but they decided that the most important one was the band. That's what I'm suggesting you to do, that's what I need you to help me with. I'd really appreciate your help, thanks. Rockk3r (talk to me please) 22:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, ❌. To many people the dominant meaning of "war cry", ignoring case of letters and the space, is a battle cry or the Salvation Army's newspaper, not a pop music band, unless the pop music band becomes really super-dominant-famous and stays so. Plain War cry will have to stay the disambig page, and other case/space variants redirecting to it. Or put an entry in Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Electric car

 * I think you did the history merge for electric car to fix the article. What about the talk page? Right now all of the history for the page is at Talk:Battery electric vehicle. Does that matter? 199.125.109.89 (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have histmerged Talk:Battery electric vehicle to Talk:Electric car . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Move of Talk:Mcfly (band)
Thanks very much for your help. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Please edit some edit summaries

 * Hi Anthony, you helped me once before with some complicated merging of page history, so I hope you might assist with this. At least three vandal accounts (already blocked in succession) moved various pages around, leaving edit summaries that include the URL of an unpleasant website. The relevant contributions are here: Special:Contributions/Spider Pig, Spider Pig, does whatever a Spider Pig does,  Special:Contributions/%C3%86schere and Special:Contributions/Seand59. I don't recommend going to the URL mentioned, as it takes over the browser and blocks attempts to quit. Would you be able to remove or munge the URL from those edit summaries?
 * Is it possible to search for more edit summaries containing this URL?
 * If you think this would be a waste of your time, just let me know. I tried WP:ANB but another admin removed the report, citing WP:BEANS. I'll go for adminship myself soon so that I can get stuck in too! - Fayenatic (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, no: it needs powers which ordinary administrators do not have. (I asked a while ago about what if someone wants to edit an edit comment.) I could delete the affected edits in the usual way, but the edits and their objectionable edit comments would remain in that page's deleted edits list and would be accessible by admins. Or see Requests for oversight.
 * Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. It's a suprise to me that they can't be edited, but given that, I'll drop the matter. WP:OS does not seem to apply, and outside that it's up to Wikimedia Foundation to decide whether to delete edit history. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty

 * Hey Anthony! Someone suggested on this article's talk page to change the title to the most commonly used international name, which is Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty. I agree with this change. Would you mind moving it? I can't do it myself. Google comes up with more hits for the alphabetical title. Thanks, — Zerida  ☥   23:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Transformers
Dude, it's in already in there. Alientraveller (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * For goodness' sake, the article is already cited within the article. And why does the audience need to know how much Optimus was made up of when Ironhide was more complex than him? Alientraveller (talk) 08:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

How do you add the polygon count? Ridiculous they aren't including it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.243.74.186 (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Red Dwarf
Anthony - sorry to bother you, but I've reversed the page move of this article to Red Dwarf (TV series) pending discussion. Unfortunately, it shouldn't have been filed as uncontroversial as there are upwards of 1500 links to be cleaned up. I've left a note at Talk:Red Dwarf to this effect, as well as a suggestion that the links be addressed first. (Ordinarily, I'd balk at undoing another admin's move - especially since you're only responding to a good-faith request - but in this case I think the RD editors need to come up with a plan first to address the sheer number of links to be fixed.) Thoughts? --Ckatz chat spy  19:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Future video game
A tag has been placed on Template:Future video game, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Xymmax (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Please ignore the above, I came across the template in a vandalized state and took a minute to realize it. I removed the tag and warned the vandal. Sorry for the spam. Xymmax (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Help moving a page

 * Hi, I noticed you work WP:RM a lot and I need help with a page move. I discussed with another user moving Towton, North Yorkshire to Towton. We came to the point that it is silly that Towton is currently a disambiguation page that link to the town and the battle because if someone were indeed looking for the battle, either way, they would have to access it via a second link either through the disambiguation page or through the town's page. So I was wondering if you could help move Towton, North Yorkshire to Towton. Thanks. 76.167.156.93 (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * See discussion in Requested moves, until that section gets to the end of the dated sections in its usual course, to await any other opinions that come. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Template for incomplete RM's
Hi! Today I contributed to an RM in the incomplete section which many readers never check, and noticed most of the entries there seem to sit there and fester with their creators completely unaware.

In an attempt to help, I've created the following template to put on the user talk-page of the creator of an incomplete RM request to try and get them to format all the parts of the request properly:

article name

As someone who deals with incomplete RM requests, I'd be grateful if you could comment on it/improve it/use it/MfD it as you see appropriate. If it's useful, feel free to move it into Template: space for the benefit of others.

Thanks for your time, Knepflerle (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Presumably RMinc = "requested move incomplete". ✅. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hope it's useful! Thanks, Knepflerle (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Insult by administrator PMAnderson
Hi Anthony

PMAnderson is insulting other users (non-native English speakers, precisely ) calling the "aliens".

here "As you can probably tell, I have had enough. If any editor supports this who actually has English as his native tongue, do let me know; until then, I utterly oppose this effort by aliens to rewrite the English language for their own convenience."

I don't think such a person is appropriate for beeing an administrator. :((( --Áñtò &#124; Ãňţõ (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)