User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2010/April-June

Articles for deletion nomination of Midnight Radio and Television
I have nominated Midnight Radio and Television, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Midnight Radio and Television. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  20:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Over the Hills and Far Away (song)

 * Hello. You moved Over the Hills and Far Away (song) as an uncontroversial WP:RM request, but I had moved the request to Contested and notified the requester. Can you please move the article back and begin a Move Request discussion if you wish? Thanks. Station1 (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems that you changed this request from uncontroversial to controversial, while I was obeying the uncontroversial move. I have put in Talk:Over the Hills and Far Away (Led Zeppelin song) a controversial-type discussion request for this reverse move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Station1 (talk) 22:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Move of Through-hole technology -> Insertion mount technology ??

 * What is your references to make the move from Through-hole technology to Insertion mount technology (IMT) ..? I never seen that description used in the technical litterature. Electron9 (talk) 02:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * At 13:52, 5 April 2010 User:Noq put in Through-hole technology a request to history-merge Through-hole technology to Insertion Mount Technology to repair a cut-and-paste move; I obeyed it. I have now reverted this move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the fix! :-) Electron9 (talk) 23:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Discussion about the deletion of empty categories
There is a discussion about an "empty" category, you deleted here - User_talk:Nyttend

I think you should bear in mind that some categories are "empty", mainly because certain individuals have been emptying them, arguably a form of vandalism. There appears to be no safeguard against this.

There was a long discussion about renaming the category - Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_October_1 - but it was emptyed DELIBERATELY, because of people wishing to airbrush a particular aspect of their past.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Elizabeth II
Anthony, there was a spelling error in your posting of the closure message in the archive of the vote in March on the EII discussion page. As an admin who gets bugged by spelling errors I went in to correct it. Nothing else was changed. I hope you don't mind. (BTW Glad to see my idea of archiving votes, etc, proposed many years ago, is still going strong. It was a hell of a battle to get people to accept the idea of keeping records at the time.) FearÉIREANN \(caint)  19:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Light tank
I'm not sure "uncontroversial" is quote the correct term for the movement of the user subpage content into Light tank given that the overall outcome of discussion was no consensus for move. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

help?

 * Can you help w/this? tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia talk:Requested moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Request to add link to "Scuba Diving" page. I today updated some of the content under "buoyancy" and added an external liink to a web page on advanced scuba techniques for improving buoyancy control. The section had a "add no more links" warning at the top.  Please review and approve if you think it is a warranted (useful and appropriate) link. Thanks.2ocean7 (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Discussion at Talk:Scuba diving. --RexxS (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

External link in Scuba diving

 * Hi Anthony, I'd be grateful if you'd give a reason for re-instating the external link that I removed because it didn't seem to contain anything that couldn't be written into the article. --RexxS (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Uhh. I tried to satisfy one side in this dispute, and it seems that I thereby automatically dissatisfied the other side in that dispute. OK, I have deleted it again. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry I've given the wrong impression. I've elaborated at Talk:Scuba diving. Regards --RexxS (talk) 07:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for repairing Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport, I wasn't aware of the extra steps that were needed to do this properly. Best Hekerui (talk) 09:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Doh.
I was not quite able to resist being a smartass to you, here. It's 2:30 in the morning my time and I'm easily entertained. But, I didn't think it was fair to e-rib you without notification. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 08:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the move.
--Againme (talk) 18:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Next-Generation Bomber

 * Should Next-Generation Bomber be moved when there is an open WP:RM discussion on its talk page? It seems like an end-run attempt against process. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, OK, I have moved it back. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

otheruses4 -> about
Please do not use otheruses4. It redirects to about.174.3.123.220 (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with my Laterite article merging problem
Thank you for COMPLETELY taking care of renaming and then merging the two Laterite articles. I soooooo appreciate you taking care of everything. That would have been my first merge; the first of anything is always stressful for me. You made my day!!! ;)Bettymnz4 (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

hi!

 * I'm new here because i'm traing to rectify wrong information. Link that is here like a winner of Rose d'ore for show 2007 is wrong, and You deleted my attempt for a placing a truth. Can You help me? Tnx, Castor Multimedia (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The page The Pyramid winner of Rose d'or was deleted as a copyvio (= violation of copyright) of web page http://www.rosedor.com/RDO/content/festival2007_winners.php . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

FIL move

 * Why was the International Luge Federation moved from its original name? Just curious about this. Chris (talk) 23:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It was requested by request "Fédération Internationale de Luge de Course → International Luge Federation — Name convention per WP:ENGLISH. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)" in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&action=edit&oldid=357065270 . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Chris (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Moving my article

 * Hey Anthony, I've noticed that you included my article Particulate inheritance theory under the requests. I have requested to rename the article just to "Particulate inheritance," but there seems to be an other article with that name and redirects to the Mendelian inheritance article.  May I have some assistance in the move, or is the move a bad request all together?  -Ano-User (talk) 03:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Move ✅. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks!! -Ano-User (talk) 01:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Pittsburgh Light Rail

 * Thanks for fixing the copy/paste moves of the Pittsburgh Light Rail lines. Scillystuff (talk) 21:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Neglected and Underutilized Crops

 * I was ready to move this article as proposed in the talk discussion until I looked at the target history. I think this needs a history merge.  I have never done one.  Can you look at this and decide on the merge and close the move discussion? Thanks. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Move

 * You recently moved Mathura (disambiguation) to Mathura. I request you to move Mathura, Uttar Pradesh to Mathura (primary naming) as I am unable to move it. Then, Redirect Mathura, Uttar Pardesh to Mathura and leave the Mathura (disambigaution) alone.  WorLD8115  ( TalK )   22:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks -- WorLD8115  ( TalK )   09:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with an image
Thank you for uploading File:Aa Manchester,UK ash fallout from Eyjafjallajökull 00.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. → Aza Toth 19:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Defunct USAAF bases during WW2

 * Yes Hi, was just going through some links of mine that I have set aside for research on AAF fields that were used during WW2 and come to find out that the page was deleted. A little upset but nothing I can't get over I guess, I would just like to know why?? As That particular site was a gold mine for me... don't suppose there is any way to get it back?? Thanks. JC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolbear64 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Was the page Category:Defunct World War II USAAF Fields ? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Please comment
Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Userbox

 * Could you add back the protection to the Userbox template. Thanks -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Shroud of Turin

 * Thanks for semi-protecting this. I had asked for that in anticipation some time ago. Is the semi-protect indefinite? It would be a good idea. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. History2007 (talk) 06:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI

 * moved your question to WP:VPT. Rd232 talk 16:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Shotgun prot

 * Hi, can you review your prot on Shotgun please - just 'coz there is a quite valid but complex semi-prot edit request on the talk. If it isn't appropriate to remove prot, that's fine too though - let me know. Ta.  Chzz  ►  17:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * At 19:27, 28 April 2010 User:MWOAP obeyed the edit request. At 06:16, 31 March 2009 User:Anthony Appleyard semiprotected Shotgun after a long succession of reverted edits (many vandalism) by anon users. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Aa 09a nasasuit flagfound.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aa 09a nasasuit flagfound.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Aa 26a claiming the moon.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aa 26a claiming the moon.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Aa nort troopers 02.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aa nort troopers 02.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair Use Rationales

 * Please indicate how use of the images meets the WP:NFCC in detail :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Answered in User talk:Sfan00 IMG. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Diving mask

 * Hi Anthony, an IP user keeps adding a DIY guide to attaching spectacles to a dive mask. It's clearly unsourced original research, and I've noted it at the article talk page. The IP user keeps changing their ip address, but all of them belong to Skynet, a Belgian ISP:
 * If you have the time, would you have a look at the edits and see whether there's anything else I can do, please? Is this a case where I should put in a request for page semi-protection, or is it too trivial to bother? Thanks --RexxS (talk) 13:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have semiprotected page Diving mask. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for sorting that out, Anthony. I also thought it was horseshit wrong, but wanted another pair of eyes to check. --RexxS (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If you have the time, would you have a look at the edits and see whether there's anything else I can do, please? Is this a case where I should put in a request for page semi-protection, or is it too trivial to bother? Thanks --RexxS (talk) 13:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have semiprotected page Diving mask. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for sorting that out, Anthony. I also thought it was horseshit wrong, but wanted another pair of eyes to check. --RexxS (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Could you please restore the template? Thank you. 18:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC) User:119.237.153.52
 * This has now been listed on DRV. In short, an IP created the template in template talk namespace, being unable to create the template itself, and you speedied it as a talk page of a nonexistent page. Stifle (talk) 08:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted Template talk:Free trade agreements of Hong Kong and moved it to Template:Free trade agreements of Hong Kong. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

WURV Richmond

 * I am hoping you will be moving the WURV zxcvbnm back to WURV soon as it has thrown some links on templates and other pages off. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 23:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, OK, ✅, hold your horses, I was in a difficult multiple histmerge caused by people renaming radio stations and users cut-and-paste moving accordingly. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries, just wanted to make sure it was all done and I didn't miss something in the call sign change. Thanks for the correct history merge.  Good work :) -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 23:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Harbourfront Centre page move

 * Hi Anthony, I saw you are moving the Harbourfront Centre pages. What I was suggesting was to move Harbourfront Centre, Toronto to Harbourfront Centre as it is a more prominant organization and link to the disambiguition page from Harbourfront Centre to have the Harbourfront Centre, Singapore linked to as well. Please advise. Thanks. (Takinson (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC))
 * See current discussions in Talk:Harbourfront Centre, Toronto and Talk:Harbourfront Centre and Talk:HarbourFront Centre (Singapore). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Reinstating protections
Hi, could you I offer a little reminder that you need to reinstate any protections on an article if you delete them for histmerges or the like. I bring it up because the article at Inca civilization (logs)was left unprotected and has subsequently seen more levels of vandalism. Thanks, Woody (talk) 02:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I had a feeling this happened as soon as I hit the edit conflict at WP:RM...
but it's fixed now. Cheers, Parsecboy (talk) 13:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Newman/Haas

 * Is there some reason you moved Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing to Newman/Haas Racing? The editors were arguing based off unverified speculation and they knew it. The move was completely in violation of Wikipedia policies. EeepEeep (talk) 23:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I obeyed a move request in the uncontroversials section of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phpby?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&action=edit&oldid=360796649 . I have now moved it back. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * While the issue has become controversial, it's been in discussion for well over a week without any movement by any of the parties involved-do you think you can take a look at it and do some admin-type things? Or at the very least, make it more widely known? I don't really know much about the page moving process... Bduddy (talk) 06:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There's really no debate here. The advocates of the page move have been unable to produce a single piece of verifiable evidence to support their proposal, so it has to stay where it is. That's all there is to it. EeepEeep (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you (2)

 * Hi, thanks for your edits at Kingdom of Great Britain (1603-1714). Sorry about all of the HTML, but, with the exception of the AoH source, this is the first public appearance of this Quote in over 400 years! Due to its historical significance, I believe all of the HTML references are necessary, I've also left full-references in the User:Stephen2nd/Sandbox (f)‎; (Article-copy) for further study. Also, may I ask your assistance on a technical question? I have written (Anne of Great Britain & date) in the Info-box, but, no matter what I try, it will not appear in the Article??? Thanks again for your assistance and contributions, many regards. Stephen2nd (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Which of the infoboxes is affected? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks; On edit page - {{Infobox Former Country - leader7 = Anne of Great Britain - year_leader7 = 1702–1714. Stephen2nd (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Template:Infobox former country allows for leader1 to leader6 only, and no more leaders. It contains a comment " ". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Northwest Passage

 * This page has been semiprotected since February because of a burst of routine vandalism in January. Is that really necessary?  The total amount of vandalism in the immediately preceding months was not all that large. 69.228.170.24 (talk) 01:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have now unprotected page Northwest Passage. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Poojah
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Poojah. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Poojah. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Teenage Dream
It should have been Katy Perry's 2010 album, not Katy Perry's 2010 Album. Strange that the link shows as blue in the macro either way.&mdash;Kww(talk) 06:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

National Broadband Plan (United States)
I think I messed up. I kept looking for the template, but the move was probably non-controversial anyway. Thanks. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Tase

 * See Talk:Tase. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Tonto Basin

 * Howdy! (I've been doing a lot of "geography" stuff, in Arizona.) New cat: Category:Mogollon Rim. The s-west of the Rim has the "Tonto Basin"-separated from the Mazatzal Mountains (not part of rim). Please move Tonto Basin (Tonto Creek) --> "Tonto Basin"  (Tonto Basin: it used to Re-Direct to Tonto Basin, Arizona.  "Tonto Basin (town)" ReDirects to the town now.  Michael, fron the HotDeserts...Mmcannis (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

PTSD edit of 2010.05.13

 * Anthony, thanks for your contribution to the article in the "Psychotherapeutic interventions" section. However, I have spent close to 45 minutes correcting edit placement, bad URLs (use Google Scholar, and get the right ones), spelling errors, punctuation errors, sentence fragments, etc. It appears that you did not give it even a cursory proofing. I will ask you please to take more time next time. If you have respect for the article and its importance, this request will make sense, I think. Tom Cloyd (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sorrows Of Stephen
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sorrows Of Stephen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Sorrows Of Stephen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Battersea Park
Re - when writing on railway topics, we normally wikilink to stations and not places, but Battersea Park railway station was already linked earlier on, so I've removed your link to Battersea Park. As for Pouparts Junction - I've left the link alone, because there never has been a station of that name; but on the linked article I've added a map, moved it to a more specific stub ( instead of ), and also added to it's talk page. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting syphilis
This tag looks better as it is smaller. Cheers Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for move help
Thanks for the speedy help on the two move requests I listed. I appreciate it!

Pnm (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Late Night Dance Party

 * If you have a moment, can you take a look at this? I seem to have made an error somewhere along the line, because the "this article's entry" link on the article page is still a redlink.  I made the AfD last night, using the newish link at the top of the page, so I think something went wrong.  If you would not mind giving your opinion, I would appreciate it.  Thanks. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  16:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks OK now. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strange, I still see a redlink. I can't figure it out.  Just a fluke, I guess.  Thanks. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  17:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ I also saw a redlink in the box on Late Night Dance Party. I purged the page, and it's now blue. -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Aa jcb with roaddrill 00.jpg
Thank you for uploading this media, (it's appreciated.)

However, it would be nice if you could give some kind of indication as to what license the media is under. That way other people can be confident in making use of it for many varied purposes :)

Adding license information also helps prevent media you've put effort into creating from being deleted :)

You may wish to read Image_copyright_tags which will assist you :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Naturally (J. J, Cale album)
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Winter (Amebix album)
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

thank you
Thank you for the requested move of Heysel Stadium Disaster/disaster. In less than 2 weeks, it will be exactly 25 years since the tragedy. :( Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Floating TOCs to the right

 * Why are you floating TOCs to the right for some articles? Have you read Template:TOC_right and Help:Section in regards to doing this? Gary King  ( talk ) 08:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes a tall narrow table of contents makes excess whitespace alongside it and readers must go a long way down to find the start of the article text. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Most of the articles that you are applying the template to don't have tall and narrow TOCs, such as Invasive grasses of North America, Jessica McClure, KISS principle, Zebra (medicine), Elephant test, List of attractions at The Wizarding World of Harry Potter, Blasphemy, and Ben Young. By the looks of it, it appears that you are applying the template to all articles in which the template won't interfere with right-aligned images or infoboxes in the lead, without using the criteria that you explained above. This strikes me as a situation similar to the currently ongoing discussion at " Seeking consensus to remove tags around ", in which a single user applies a formatting style to articles that they edit that does not conform with the millions of other articles in existence, when a simple script change could make this change for only that user specifically that applies sitewide. Gary King  ( talk ) 16:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, OK, point taken. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, cheers. Sorry, I didn't mean to be bite-y. Gary King  ( talk ) 00:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Histmerge help
Hi. I need an admin to move a partial history into a cut and paste article due to housekeeping several bad moves. I wasn't sure if listing it with db-histmerge would solve the problem because it only involves a partial edit history. The current article is located at Kaupulehu, Hawaii. There is a missing series of eight consecutive edits from the page history which occurred between 17:00, 21 May 2010 - 19:57, 21 May 2010, and were made by a single editor, W Nowicki. You can find all eight edits here:


 * 1) (cur | prev)  19:57, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (7,116 bytes) (lava flow and crater) (undo)
 * 2) (cur | prev) 18:58, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (6,257 bytes) (even less advertising and more citations) (undo)
 * 3) (cur | prev) 18:43, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (6,154 bytes) (describe access, citation) (undo)
 * 4) (cur | prev) 18:29, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (5,895 bytes) (correct perp, more link auditing) (undo)
 * 5) (cur | prev) 18:21, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (5,876 bytes) (derrive name from usual place name source) (undo)
 * 6) (cur | prev) 17:49, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) m (5,355 bytes) (moved Four Seasons Resort Hualalai to Kaupulehu, Hawaii: The resort is only one notable thing at this location, so use location as title, not Hotel name) (undo)
 * 7) (cur | prev) 17:48, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (5,355 bytes) (add some history) (undo)
 * 8) (cur | prev) 17:00, 21 May 2010 W Nowicki (talk | contribs) (2,662 bytes) (remove some blatant advertising that was in there for far too long) (undo)

Can you merge those eight edits (and anything after it, but not before it) into the new page history of Kaupulehu, Hawaii, or anything that should be merged? I want to maintain the old page history of the redirect (Four Seasons Resort Hualalai). If you don't think the old edit history should be moved, that's fine. Viriditas (talk) 22:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The whole history of Four Seasons Resort Hualalai (except the last 4 or 5 edits) should be histmerged into Kaupulehu, Hawaii, as it is a continuous history. Sometimes an article on one topic does gradually evolve into an article on another topic. This happened with a set of articles on the subject "black sheep" and similar.
 * I suspect that this histmerge is impossible, anyway, because page Kaupulehu, Hawaii is stored on http://en.wikipedia.org/ and Four Seasons Resort Hualalai is stored on https://secure.wikimedia.org . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Four Seasons Resort Hualalai is now back on http://en.wikipedia.org . Some Wikimedia system glitch? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I don't want the history of FSRH to be merged into Kaupulehu, as the page move should not have occurred in the first place.  The Four Seasons Resort Hualalai is a separate topic from Kaupulehu that can be expanded and was kept as part of an AfD that occurred in 2009.  After withdrawing the nom due to a snow keep, the OP began the process of arguing that the article wasn't notable, and another eventually agreed to merge to Kaupulehu, but the article was moved instead of simply redirected to the new topic.  I've made a few comments over at Talk:Four Seasons Resort Hualalai and I may restore the article depending on whether or not I have time to do the research and add the references.  So, the history should be separate anyway. Viriditas (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: I'm working on User:Viriditas/Four Seasons Resort Hualalai in my userspace, so I do plan on copying this over to the redirect when I'm done. The redirect has the current history of the Hualalai page. Viriditas (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Page recreation request

 * I'd like to retry creating the Nottingham (band) page for the band Nottingham signed to Oort Records.


 * I kept saving the changes as id make minor changes before and it caused it to be speedily deleted because it seemed unimportant. I will create the whole page in the sandbox before i move on and save the changes if thats what i need to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mount Miller (talk • contribs) 06:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Spurgeon's

 * During the course of the discussion it was discovered that someone claiming to be from the "marketing department" decided to spam up the article a few hours before you nominated it. Since it had already been open for 13 days with 2 "keep" and reverted to the non-spam version, I closed it "keep".
 * I'm half tempted to email them and suggest that they fire the dumbass in their marketing department who thought this was a good idea. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have put a note in User talk:Nominomes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * See Special:Contributions/Nominomes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Question about page move
I'm trying to get active in the move process, as a result of stumbling across Category:Requests to move a userspace draft. However, I haven't been active at WP:RM, so I don't quite know how that page works. (I see a list of requests, which I take to be open requests, is there a log of completed requests)?

My particular question relates to this move

I'll first note that Wikipedia has manged to create a need for a process, by creating the template, but if someone has articualted process, I haven't seen it. As a consequence, I'm making it up on the fly. In short, I review the request, if the article meets a very low hurdle, I move it, but if it is seriously deficient, I decline the move an post specific suggestions for improvement on the editor's talk page.

In my view, an article with no references should not be moved.

In addition WP:RM explicitly notes:

1 Processes beyond the scope of this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves: ...

So I am puzzled that it was handled at WP:RM
 * Moves from User space - (new/unconfirmed users only) add to the top of the article.

Don't get me wrong, I'm struggling to clear the backlog at Category:Requests to move a userspace draft, and would love some help, but I'd like to see us put together a coherent process.

Any thoughts?-- SPhilbrick  T  13:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Problems with a disruptive rollbacker
Hi! I would like to evidence you the continuous rollbacks by user:Colin Gleen of my wikification of Ferrol. My editings consisted in adding a standard infobox, removing all POV parts, purging some sections which had no role in an encyclopedia, and other format adds. The article is now decent and in the same path of most other Spanish cities ones, while this guy continues to restore his versions full of errors, unsourced statements, questions, unencyclopedical details etc. Thanks and good work. --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 12:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Ciao! It seems that user:Colin Gleen is now using a sockpuppet identity, user:Michael Peer, to restore his horrendous, antiwikipedic version of Ferrol. Can you stop him? By the way, this user is easily recognizable for he's dedicating himself only to Ferrol, with articles full of useful stuff but full of POV and amateurish digressions (for example, in an article about a journal published in that Spanish city, 75% of the text spoke about Ferrol's economic crisis...). Let me know and thanks in advance for help... --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I would notice that user:Colin Gleen is keeping reverting Ferrol, Spain to his horrendous, unwikipedic version, now using another sockpuppet (see Ferrol:History for the new one). Is there any chance to block this crazy guy? Thanks and good work. --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Check what he wrote in my talk page with his new sockpuppet identity, user:Gladys Tuffnell. --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: histmerge
thx :) Adrigon (talk) 06:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

"Anti-pedophile activism" Article Nominated for Deletion
You have previously edited or commented on the article entitled "Anti-pedophile activism." It has now been nominated for deletion. If you'd like to follow or contribute to the AfD process, please visit the page created for this purpose: Articles for deletion/Anti-pedophile activism. Your input would be appreciated. ~ Homologeo (talk) 15:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC).

Clostridium difficile
Vancomycin is indeed given orally in C. Dif not iv. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Anarchy (magazine)
Thanks for the page move. Much appreciated. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 18:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Bi Rain and Park Kahi

 * Per your recent moves of those two pages: I think you should have proceeded with a bit more caution. Both of those moves have been the subjects of recent discussions (see User talk:EunSoo and User talk:SKS2K6), and are definitely not non-controversial, per WP:COMMONNAME. I think they should be moved back pending a proper move discussion. Regards-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  06:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * SKS and I are still in discussion but the common naming is not only the issue but the adaption to Wikipedia as well. Also SKS suggested that I make the Request for Moves on both pages and that is what I have done. EunSoo (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * "Still in discussion" is the relevant point. The moves should not have been listed or made as uncontroversial.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  06:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This move was not only a bad idea, but what you basically did is rename the article "Rain Rain". "Bi" means "rain" in Korean. And then Anthony even went as far as go through the the article and say that he goes by "Bi Rain", which he doesn't. This should have been discussed extensively on the article's talk page before taking action. Groink (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I did not edit Rain (entertainer) or Bi Rain, only moved it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes but SKS was the one who gave me the idea of putting in the request and the discussion is on our talk page and not on the musicians talk page, between the 2 of us, thus it doesn't count. EunSoo (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have moved them back to Rain (entertainer) and Kahi (entertainer). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Page moves

 * Hello Anthony thanks moving processing the pages. I posted another request of disambiuated titles. Thank you again. EunSoo (talk) 06:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe I am being too judgemental. In your opininon what do you think Anthony? EunSoo (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have listed these page moves for discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I know but I want your opinion on the matter. Just your personal opinion. EunSoo (talk) 10:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If there is any chance that a page move will be controversial, it should be listed controversial-fashion: see Talk:Rain (entertainer), Talk:Kahi (entertainer), Talk:Usher (entertainer), Talk:Madonna (entertainer). For how to list a controversial-type move, see Requested moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Good work
Anthony, please allow me to compliment you on how you've handled this recent page-move foofaraw. You were actually more helpful than the rest of us to a new user who doesn't yet understand the ins and outs of Wikipedia. I know we've had some differences of opinion here and there, but I've always noticed and admired the great volume of good work you do (including and especially dealing with all the messes that crop up on the cut-and-paste-move page). I don't know if you are scholar, but you are certainly a gentleman. Give yourself a well-deserved pat on the back. Regards-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Never on Tuesday

 * The page you moved was created to sidestep a block. Never on Tuesday was changed to a permanent redirect in 2009, after it was recreated several times post AfD. The page still has no significant content. Would you please return it to the protected redirect for Brett Ratliff? Horrorshowj (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But what is the connection between Brett Ratliff (an American football quarterback born on 8 August 1985) and Never on Tuesday (a film made in 1998 when Brett Ratliff was age 12 or 13)? Page Never on Tuesday never mentions Brett Ratliff. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. Adam Rifkin, the films director was the redirect. Wow that one is embarrassing.13:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Horrorshowj (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Top Gear

 * Please can you move Top Gear back to Top Gear (disambiguation), this is a controversial move and should not have been made without a standard RM discussion, there certainly wasn't one highlighted on any of the relevant talk pages. The person requesting the move should be informed of the process for starting a discussion on controversial moves. There are masses of links now broken throughout the encyclopaedia because of this careless request. Thanks for your time. Jeni  ( talk ) 22:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I guess you've gone to bed, I've put a temporary fix in awaiting another admin to come along and make the final step. Jeni  ( talk ) 22:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The Top Gear disambig page is now back at Top Gear (disambiguation). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Un/Controversial moves

 * Hey. I know you've been moving pages at the request of User:EunSoo, but please be advised that these page moves are controversial as they go against both consensus and established Wikipedia guidelines.  For example, Jessica Jung should not be at Jessica Jung, as she goes by simply "Jessica" in her professional life.  Her surname, although correct, should not be included in the page name.
 * His controversial moves, listed at the talk pages of both Talk:Rain (entertainer) and Talk:Kahi (entertainer) have shown that the user's moves are indeed controversial. However, the user continues to move, or ask to move, pages regardless of other editors' comments.
 * So I guess my request is, could you please undo the move so that it can be properly discussed on the talk page? Thanks in advance.  :)  SKS (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hold on a sec. SKS are you basing this on my history of moves. So because I submitted a couple of moves you disagree with you suddenly think that my moves are negative. It is quite clear that Jessica is not only called Jessica but also Jessica Jung. You see this is what I am referring to so because someone is called Jessica that means it should be Jessica (entertainer) that makes no sense, espacially when she is also popluarliy known as Jessica Jung. Why would you add her job title at the end of her name when you already have a page with her second most popluar name (as a redirect)?? EunSoo (talk) 03:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * To User:SKS2K6: Please which move is "the move"? Which page do you want me to move to where? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Wait a sec Anthony is that even allowed? Do the rules say that an article can't have the subjects last name in it? Cause I don't see it in the rules. If so explain to me why Im Yoona is not Yoona or Yoona (entertainer) because this is actually getting me angry now. Since Anthony is the mover then we need his opinion on this because if it was against the rules then Anthony wouldn't have moved it and just set it out for discussion. Not every article move needs to be based consensus. And this is a prime example that because Wikipedia already has a perfectly good title for her and it is being used as a redirect page. EunSoo (talk) 07:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * In 11-13 November 2009 there were moves back and forth between Im Yoona and YoonA. (Here, 'Im' is not 'I am' but a Korean surname.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Am I breaking any rules cause I have read the disambig. page a few times and I don't understand why I am being opposed?? If Im Yoona is fine then what's wrong with Jessica Jung? EunSoo (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Im Yoona was decided after some discussion because the page was created some time before the rest of the Girls' Generation solo pages, when Yoona was more notable than the rest of the members due to her acting. I believe she is credited under "Im Yoona" for dramas (this is in Korean, but see this news article.  As such, Im Yoona makes sense.  Jessica Jung doesn't make sense according to Wikipedia naming conventions, because she goes by her first name "Jessica" professionally in all that she does.  (Probably because there are no other Jessicas in South Korean entertainment.)  Therefore, it doesn't make sense to add her surname to the page name.  EunSoo, I know that you're having serious issues with the way Wikipedia names pages, but all the pages are (well, were) at their current locations for good reasons. SKS (talk) 14:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

EunSoo (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That's just it doesn't makes sense because:
 * 1) The rules don't say you can't use the surname
 * 2) She is also called Jessica Jung and if not then why is it in her article
 * 3) Jessica is already taken, thus Jessica Jung is another alternative.


 * Hi Anthony. I haven't been very involved in this controversy, but it seems from reading the talk pages for EunSoo's various moves that he/she doesn't understand WP's naming and disambiguation policies and keeps initiating moves in spite of opposition and patient explanation by a diverse chorus of editors.  I hope that EunSoo can be persuaded to start properly characterizing his/her moves as potentially controversial rather than sneaking them in as uncontroversial; in the mean time, is there a way to implement some sort of administrative moratorium on his/her move requests?  Apologies to any parties involved if I haven't learned the full story from my reading of the material on various talk pages and am misrepresenting anything. --Atemperman (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * For myself, I can remember to change any uncontroversial requests by User:EunSoo to controversial. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Unnecessary deletion

 * Hi! I work with the participatory drama Conspiracy for Good. I just wanted to tell you that the Wikipedia page of the same name that you removed was not part of the world of the story. (We have utmost respect for Wikipedia and wouldn't spam it like that.) The article you removed was related to a completely unrelated psychological phenomenon. It wasn't a great article, but maybe it didn't call for deletion, either. Here's a cached version. Thanks. Revontuli (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it: Articles for deletion/Conspiracy for good. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sefa
A tag has been placed on Sefa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Horselover Frost (talk &middot; edits) 03:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Request

 * Hi, i just picked a random admin for this. Could you please delete the Category:Dally M Fullbacks of the year. Thanks. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Masonic Temple

 * Perhaps you can help. I was about to put a histmerge request tag on Masonic Temple but had second thoughts. There was a cut & paste move attempt made from Masonic temple yesterday. Masonic temple 05:16, 8 June = Masonic Temple 06:16, 8 June.  However, subsequent edits were made to Masonic temple, so that now we have two articles, with Masonic Temple duplicating but adding to the earlier article. Another factor is that the two articles' talk pages differ.  Furthermore there is a long convoluted discussion about which title is correct at Talk:Masonic temple (disambiguation).  So I'm not sure if a histmerge is advisable or not and leave it up to you. Thanks. Station1 (talk) 06:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Histmerge no: see WP:Parallel versions. I changed Masonic temple into a redirect to Masonic Temple. See Talk:Masonic Temple. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Thank you. Station1 (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I changed Masonic temple into a redirect to Masonic Temple because page Masonic temple was the same as the beginning of page Masonic Temple. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Terry Silverlight
A tag has been placed on Terry Silverlight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Page move
Hi Anthony, You recently moved the article Masonic temple to Masonic Temple (with the T capitalized)... thank you. Would you also move Masonic temple (disambiguation) to Masonic Temple (disambiguation) ... same reasoning. Blueboar (talk) 12:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Blueboar (talk) 18:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Article moves

 * Hello Anthony, I'm Airplaneman. I saw you move IPhone OS version history in my watchlist. Thanks! Next time, could you also look if an article has archives from its talk page and move those too? I found Talk:IPhone OS version history/Archive 1 and have moved it to Talk:IOS (Apple) version history/Archive 1 to match the article's new name. Since Talk:IPhone OS version history/Archive 1 is now renamed, could you delete it as CSD G6 (housekeeping)? Thanks, Airplaneman   ✈  23:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Airplaneman   ✈  21:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Infinity chat
Hi Antonoy, I have removed the chat-section about "Limited infinity" which anon user 213.158.199.137 inserted to the talk page for the 3rd time now, and to which you kindly helped correctly formulating the intended equations. I hope you don't mind my removal of the section again, as this is clearly a case of WP:FORUM. I have left a 3rd level user warning on the anon's talk page. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Masonic temple (disambiguation) move
In this edit you implemented a requested move. I had requested exactly that. However, there has been much discussion, and I agreed with a different proposal that it should be moved to "Masonic Temple" instead. Your move did not close the discussion or resolve the issues there. Could you revisit and comment in the discussion section please. It is confusing to me and to others, that it appears a capital A Administrator has visited and rendered judgement, when clearly it is not resolved by any consensus. Your acknowledging that it is not resolved (and perhaps that you should not have implemented the move yet) would be appreciated. --doncram (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Vektor

 * I noticed you moved Vektor less than 24 hours after a move request was started, despite opposition. I'm not sure why that was necessary. As you know, move requests are usually open for about 7 days to allow time for editors to develop consensus.  While I would have no problem with a move if there is consensus, I am surprised at your rush.  Would you please consider undoing this move and reopening the discussion?  The dab page can be moved to Vektor (disambiguation) in the meantime if you like. Station1 (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Closing

 * Talk:Kahi (entertainer) move has been more than 7 days please take a look. Thanks. 99.243.117.17 (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It has much talk and no concensus. Leave it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Aa saddleworthmoor 191.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Aa saddleworthmoor 191.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Okan

 * I think I may have got myself in a muddle here, putting the wrong thing in the db-move! What I meant to end up with was: Okan for the article about the Go competition, and Okan (disambiguation) for the dab page. A previous editor had moved the Go comp to a disambiguated heading, without updating any of the incoming links; none of the items on the dab page are uses of "Okan" alone (mostly they are people with it as given name), so I think the Go comp should revert to being at Okan. Can you help sort it out? Sorry for any confusion. PamD (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That depends on whether the Go competition is the dominant meaning of "Okan". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it's the only entity called "Okan", which I thought made it clear. But I'll back off - and have amended the template which generated most of the incoming links which the previous editor didn't bother to update. PamD (talk) 06:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Should a dab page be given categories such as Category:Turkish masculine given names? I don't think so, another editor does! I think the category would only be appropriate for a page about the name, which this dab page is not. PamD (talk) 06:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems suitable to me, since page Okan lists 8 people named Okan. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Irish Long Distance Swimming Association ILDSA

 * hi anthony. if the page really doesn't belong on wikipedia, that is ok with me, i have no affiliation with the ILDSA.  the ILDSA is important to the open water swimming community and the marathon swimming community because it provides observers to ride along on the swimmer's escort boat to certify that swimmer has meet all the regulations during the crossing.  The ILDSA is also important because it keeps records of the results.  Swimming the irish channel is a monumental achievement in open water swimming. It has been swum by notable people, including Alison Streeter as mentioned in her Honoree page the website of International Swimming Hall of Fame. http://www.ishof.org/honorees/2006/Alison%20Streeter.htm  The Irish Channel is currently known as the North Channel (Great Britain and Ireland) Candotoo (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it: Articles for deletion/Irish Long Distance Swimming Association Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks for your consideration. after my above post, I emailed the ILDSA for their input, asking for info regarding membership or similar in the Irish Sports Council (for example) or FINA.  What else would you suggest to make this into a quality wiki page?  tks, mike Candotoo (talk) 06:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Abuse (disambiguation)
I have explained at Talk:Abuse (disambiguation) why the two items I removed do not belong on the disambiguation page. I think it better that you remove them, rather than me undoing your undoing of my deleting. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

25143 Itokawa

 * Hello Anthony. I have a small question after you pointed out that the article can't be history merged. Do you mean that I shouldn't have done this edit after this? Just want to know how the history merge works... Kind regards. Rehman(+) 05:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Those article-merge edits are valid. As regards the history-merge request, see WP:Parallel histories. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ow I see. Thanks! Rehman(+) 05:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Article Danagog

 * Hello, I see my article Danagog has been deleted, I added sources as requested and it still was deleted, Could you give me a rundown of things I should have added or removed from the article. Thanks so much. Happy Editing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damilae (talk • contribs) 08:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it: Articles for deletion/Danagog. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Article Cymer Inc.

 * Hi Anthony. I am not sure what you did with my request to re-name the article from "Cymer Inc." to "Cymer".  My request was likely not clear.  I just published the article earlier today, June 22, and was not allowed to call it "Cymer".  Can you help me?  Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakedmiller (talk • contribs) 20:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Page Cymer already exists and is a place in Wales. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Qamdo (town)

 * Hi Anthony. Can I ask for your help in sorting out a move that you were previously involved in as administrator.  Qamdo (town) is clearly the primary use of Qamdo (the prefecture and county are named after their capitals, which are the town).  I have moved the existing page, a disambiguation page, to Qamdo (disambiguation), but admin help is required to move the town article to Qamdo.  There really is no need for the (town), which is generally deprecated for placenames.  I have updated the hatnote on the town article in preparation.  The question of whether all the entities should be known as Qamdo or Chamdo is an entirely different, and as yet unsettled, matter.  Skinsmoke (talk) 18:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Speedy and efficient as always!  Skinsmoke (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Help Feed The Troll

 * Why was the article for the website "Help Feed the Troll" deleted? You deleted it, and I believe I stated the case for its significance.  What was not satisfactory about it?  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tickleangelo (talk • contribs) 06:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It was deleted for "A7: Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" per this log.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

WKBS-TV

 * I was the one who requested the pagemove of WKBS Cornerstone to WKBS-TV, but it seems the WKBS-TV article goes nowhere but in a redirect to itself. Could you fix this? -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 09:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. It looks like that the same move request was accidentally obeyed twice. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks and no worries. :) -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 02:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Hydroelectricity

 * Hello Anthony. Before I put up the history merge template, I would like to ask if is it really possible to history merge User:Rehman/Hydroelectricity in to Hydroelectricity? Or is cut-paste the only option? The userspace version was taken from this version of the article, which is old by two edits that involves only removing text. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 13:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * While User:Rehman was editing his version, other uses were editing the main version in page Hydroelectricity. The severe text reductions in User:Rehman/Hydroelectricity (see this compare) would probably prove very controversial. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Assuming that other users agree with the change (discussion here), is it technically possible to do a history merge? Rehman(+) 15:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If I transferred the edits of User:Rehman/Hydroelectricity in to Hydroelectricity, I would have to also transfer the parallel edits of Hydroelectricity elsewhere. That depends on a concensus as to which of Hydroelectricity and User:Rehman/Hydroelectricity is the better article on hydroelectricity. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Thats what I wanted to know. I will let you know once consensus is reached. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 01:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. Just to clarify, the above request (now listed here) is not controversial. The objections put forward by other editors were to not redirect Small hydro, Micro hydro, and Pico hydro, to the hydroelectricity article (as in the merge proposal). Thus, the redirecting will not be done. Whats happening right now is just mere restructuring and cleanup, and so far there were no objections to this. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 00:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits

 * Hi, I want to know what's similarity between Eye-pad and ipad.As you created redirect between them. Max Viwe |  Wanna chat with me?   —Preceding undated comment added 13:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC).
 * In pronunciation. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Paper Mario DS

 * Can you undelete the history of Paper Mario DS? The administrator that closed the AFD, deleted the article even though the AFD result was for redirect not delete . At first I thought of making an entry at deletion review but according to that page I don't need to make one for history undeletions. SNS (talk) 00:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * At 06:32, 27 June 2010 User:Spartaz undeleted it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah I noticed that right after adding that comment. I considered removing the comment from this page (with an explanation in the edit summary) but I wasn't sure if I should have or not. SNS (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Admin Icon

 * Hi, Why don't you put an administrator Icon on your user page so that everyone can recognize you as admin? Max Viwe |  Wanna chat with me?  17:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

PBSKIDS

 * Unfortunately, I live in England and I have never seen or heard of most of the TV programs listed in page PBS Kids. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

First Arab Congress (1913)

 * I saw you deleted the article about this Paris event. I have no idea what the article looked like and must assume it was not up to Wikipedia standards. However, I can assure you as an academic in the field that the 1913 Arab Congress in 1913 was just as seminal and influential as the 1897 Zionist Congress in Basel, which did rightfully receive an article. 132.229.189.116 (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no article (deleted or undeleted) called First Arab Congress (1913) or First Arab Congress. Please what is the article's correct name? The deletion log says that I have deleted no files with names like this file and with a name containing the word "Arab" at least since 05:44, 5 August 2009. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)