User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2011/July-December

Version 1 page

 * Hi Anthony, you left a page at Varieties of Arabic/version 1; I can't figure out whether you meant to delete it after sorting out some page history issues. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Varieties_of_Arabic/version_1&action=history - Fayenatic (talk) 18:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * For its history, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Varieties_of_Arabic/version_1&action=history . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Aa Jegere i vann 24159a.jpg

 * Hi, you copied this one from no.wiki - it's been deleted there, but as I don't read Norwegian, I've no idea why. You might want to update your summary.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added information to the file. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Can you pls undelete Category:Internet in Cyprus

 * Hello Anthony
 * I believe you have deleted several months ago the Category:Internet in Cyprus because it was empty. Since now it has 4 elements, would you be able to re-create it? Cyprus is the only country missing from the Category:Internet by country Maryafrika (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Manchester wikimeets

 * Hi Anthony. I've set up a standing page for the Manchester wikimeets at meta:Meetup/Manchester - next one will be on 17 September if you're interested in coming (please sign up!). I'm also setting up a list of people that want to receive notices about the meets, which might also be of interest. How did the photos from last month's meet come out? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Images added: see Meetup/Manchester 8. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid accusations that this posting violates WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Page move

 * How exactly is the moving of Circuit de la Sarthe to Circuit des 24 Heures not controversial? Talk:Circuit des 24 Heures seems to quite clearly show there was still ongoing discussion without any clear consensus, with reliable referencing for both names.  Nor was the fact that this was posted on WP:Requested Move ever mentioned in this discussion. The359  ( Talk ) 06:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have reverted this move and put a discussed-move header on the discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmm
Might be policy to move to an article's talk page, but since the article (Dream With Me) has extremely little in terms of editorship, I'm not sure if it'll get much - if any - discussion except maybe one or two people. CycloneGU (talk) 06:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Ketogenic diet
Anthony,

Please stop adding a section on the Inuit diet to the ketogenic diet article. This article is about a medical nutrition therapy, not about low carb, high protein diets that are ketogenic. See low-carbohydrate diet. I'd expect an administrator to know better than adding unsourced sections to an FA. Note also that WP:WEIGHT requires us to show that reliable sources discuss the Inuit diet when they are discussing this medical therapy in detail. They don't. Colin°Talk 13:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Freddy

 * The actual film says "Part 2". The poster did not include this in the title, but the actual film says "Part 2" and that is what we go by when naming articles. That's also what the copyright is.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  13:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This seems to refer to A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw your recent move of the page where you took it from "A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2" to "A Nightmare on Elm Street 2". The film itself actually says "Part 2". So, the original page name was correct.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have put in a discussed move back. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Boom Boom

 * I request a history undeletion of Boom Boom. SNS (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The deleted edits of Boom Boom are not part of the history of the present Boom Boom disambig page but an old page deleted at 19:53, 4 April 2005 by AfD Votes for deletion/Boom Boom: "Boom Boom is a koopa-like monster from Super Mario Bros. 3. This monster was found in every fortress of every world.  And a few levels besides fortresses contained them too; but they were in World 8. Mario must step on Boom Boom 3 times to win the fortress, the first of which is worth 1000 points, the second 2000, and the third 4000. In worlds 3 and later, he can fly between the first and second steps. Boom Boom's were supposed to be part of Bowser's army. Boom Boom also guarded the navy, air force and tank squad from World 8.  ". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Hyper engine

 * I have edited out many, if not all, of the material commented upon on the article's talk page. It would now be quite easy to transfer the remaining sections into the existing Hyper engine article.  I was quite concerned about the major rework necessary to revise the existing article with what material I thought was needed to revive it, but I am now confident, with the consensus of all concerned, that I can manage that task.  Would you please, when you find a moment, take a look at my edits and leave your comments?  Regards,  Buster40004  Talk  16:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hyper engine; User:Buster40004/Sandbox/Projects/Hiper engine/Hyper engine. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Black-headed Gull
Hi, Anthony. Unfortunately the move is not uncontroversial. The bird project fully capitalises all bird species, and this is accepted as an exception to the usual lc convention, including at WP:FAC. I've therefore moved the article back and undone the last editor's good faith changes.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Some more history undeletion requests

 * I request history undeletions of Prey 2, Sonic Free Riders, & Pikmin 3 (& the talk page for the last one). SNS (talk) 05:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Prey 2:, as its only 2 deleted edits are a stub "The announced game sequel to prey. Please add more to this article." and the same plus a speedy-delete tag.
 * Sonic Free Riders:, as its only 2 deleted edits are a doodle "dfgdfgdfgdfgdfg" and the same plus a speedy-delete tag.
 * Pikmin 3 & its talk page: ✅. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Get 'Em Girls

 * Hi, shouldn't Get 'Em Girls be moved back to Get 'em Girls because according to WP:CAPS, four letters or less should be in lower case. Ozurbanmusic (talk) 22:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * . Here, "'Em" is not a conjunction or a preposition or "to". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Error on a disambiguation page

 * Hi Anthony, I hope you can help me. I've noticed that the disambiguation page for Peace Oil contains incorrect information. I'd amend it myself, but as I work for the charity that runs Peace Oil (UK), I thought I'd better check first.  The page currently states that Peace Oil (UK) is marketed 'with the support of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain'.  This is not true; we receive no such report.  Perhaps the page could be amended to say something like 'Peace Oil (UK), a brand of olive oil marketed in the UK through the Charities Advisory Trust'. CAT2011 (talk) 10:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅; should "no such report" be "no such support"? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Query

 * What was this about? --John (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Thermal lance. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I replied at article talk. I request that you not misuse the revert tool like this in the future, and that you notify me if you undo any more of my edits. Thanks, --John (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Problematic histmerge

 * Hi Anthony, as you may (or may not) know, Lying down game was recently listed at WP:RM and after a week of discussion SilkTork closed the RM and moved the article to Planking (fad). Planking (fad) already had a history and had been text-merged into the Lying down game article on 31 May 2011. Instead of moving the original history of Planking (fad) to, say, Planking (fad)/version 2, SilkTork moved Lying down game over the Planking (fad) article and then undeleted the original history of Planking (fad), basically performing a histmerge on two articles that had parallel histories and should never have been histmerged. The history of the article from prior to 31 May is now an absolute mess, jumping between two different articles. How to fix cut-and-paste moves says that it is possible, just incredibly tedious, to undo a histmerge and, as I'm not an admin, I was wondering if you could please undo this histmerge or point me to another admin who would be able to? Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I can do it tomorrow. Here in England it is 11.33 pm and I need to go to bed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. I appreciate it. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 07:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, I think. The extracted edits are in Planking (fad)/version 2. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks again, Jenks24 (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Mario Super Sluggers

 * I was looking at the history of Mario Super Sluggers & noticed it was originally made by a cut & paste of Super Mario Stadium Baseball. . SNS (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Populated places in India
As agreed on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (India) the dab ", India" is phased out for individual articles. I moved all that I could, these need help: There may be the need to create XXX/version 2 in some cases. FYI ", India" is currently only intended to be used for WP:SIA pages in Category:Set indices on populated places in India Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 03:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Dhabouli, India -> Dhabouli, Saharsa
 * Hassan, India -> Hassan, Karnataka
 * Karungulam, Tamil Nadu, India -> Karungulam, Tamil Nadu
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ox Tales for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ox Tales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ox Tales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 04:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Xe/Blackwater
First, to address a little history, intra-editorially: You may have made my day with this: "Some sort of page is needed here", courtesy you, April 2011, Security Industry Association article created. I don't know if you remember my involvement in this re: "Security" v "Securities" industry associations tangle. I don't even remember a lot of it. But, for my part, before I found the new Security IA article in the process of writing this note tonight, my heart had sunk when I found that SIA was why your name sounded familiar. I'd come upon your name in this much bigger naming wrangle over at Xe/Blackwater.

Well, I did weigh in on Xe/Blackwater naming, here; then decided to write you. (It may not even be my first time on Xe. I've definitely been in that neighborhood in the past. That's why I went back there today, with the "move to DC" article.) To you:
 * In case blissfully somehow maybe you hadn't known that the Xe problem was never resolved (as I think it should be resolved), and even with the SIA in our past:
 * Maybe you'd like to take another look at Xe/Blackwater.

I didn't try to figure out what you'd gone through or where you stood back in '09 on Xe. I felt you were trying to move toward Xe.

Meanwhile, back to SIA. Yeh, your April creation is (still) just a stub. It had actually had little interest to me, as such (I had come at it from the Securities IA side (which had been misnamed Security IA, as I recall it)) and I was so frazzled after the go-rounds that I never figured out how to, or never tried to, do what you did in April. Maybe now I'll go back, build up the stub some just for old times' sake. Least I can do, right? But for now, Thank you! How could you possibly follow-up so nicely six months later? I have to wonder. It makes my head spin, given the obvious scale of your overall Wiki endeavor.

Aargh. ... Now I'm confused again, with this, April 2011, Securities Industry Association article ALSO then created by you? Wasn't there one with older roots? Wow. You had to do the SIA disambig., too, in April, from scratch re: these two, I guess. Well, frazzled I was. "Scorched earth" has now come to mind (with specific memories still blessedly minimal; does this mean there was no article by either name from Oct. to April? sort of looks that way; if you're interested, I think there was some more history on Securities Industry Association, under the Security IA name, if you wanted to & could dig it up). Well, ...

... anyway. Heartened at your willingness nay inclination (nay eagerness?) to wade back in to old tangles, I (sorry, sort of frazzled again,) hereby post this (as, hopefully, something better than nothing).

Cheers. Swliv (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Page Securities Industry Association has a deleted history of 8 edits.
 * Page Security Industry Association has a deleted history of 16 edits; see Articles for deletion/Security Industry Association.
 * Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I can't say which article ended up with which content, but I expect most of both applies to the merged/defunct organization called the Securities Industry Association. My recollection is that there was little ever done about the actual Security Industry Association, though I may be wrong.
 * If you can and would give me access to those two deleted articles I would sift through them and propose, or edit in, what seems still useful. As I said yesterday, on the new Security Industry Association article, I have a bit of a feeling for it now and may try to build it from available outside, new material.
 * For what it's worth, I did collect a couple of endorsements to my Xe comment at the Blackwater talk page.
 * Thanks again. Swliv (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * In User talk:Swliv. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * One more spin-off of this initiative (and thank you much for helping with Xe):
 * Talk:International Peace Operations Association outlines the need for another name change. As I say there, I've done a major and hopefully adequate update of the article in preparation for the change.
 * If there's a way to pursue this type of request other than one-to-one, you can let me know. Maybe I could work it out from the Xe process. But if you're willing to take this one on, I'd appreciate it. Thanks again. Swliv (talk) 04:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Best put in an ordinary discussed-type page move request to move International Peace Operations Association to International Stability Operations Association. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I managed to do it, it seems cleanly. Any comments welcome. More comments or no, thanks for your help. Swliv (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

History Undeletion Requests

 * I request history undeletions of Kremling, Kremlings, Bond 23, & Tom Nook (as well as their talk pages). Also the talk page for Aquapod (bottle) (if I recall correctly that had the correct templates for the article, so I don't get why it was deleted). SNS (talk) 03:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Bond 23 & Tom Nook & Talk:Aquapod (bottle). Kremling & Kremlings, as they were deleted by AfD and they have had no history after that except a redirect each; see Articles for deletion/Kremling & Articles for deletion/Kremlings. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Circumcision controversy in early Christianity
Please revert an undiscussed move on what is a pretty tightly focused article here:

. . Ewawer (talk | contribs) moved Circumcision controversy in early Christianity to Circumcision in Christianity (To open the article to a more general discussion of circumcision in Christianity)

Religious_circumcision has a good deal on the wider topic, & is where the wider title should redirect, or what a new article should be based on.

Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Another incorrect histmerge

 * Hi Anthony, I'm hoping you could take a look at User talk:Fastily and the Cheers (Drink to That) article. Fastily has performed an incorrect histmerge between a user's sandbox and the actual article when they had parallel histories. So I'm wondering if you could reverse the histmerge as you did at the planking article. I would suspect this one should be easier as there are less than 50 revisions and, basically, every edit by Calvin999 is one of the histories and every edit not by him is the other history. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅: Cheers (Drink to That) and Cheers (Drink to That)/version 2. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Jenks24 (talk) 02:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the page move
Hi Anthony - thanks for fixing Section 44 of the Constitution of Australia... (the darn word has too many t's for my liking! and typing skills ---Shirt58 (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Moorland Closed (HM Prison) requested move

 * Hello Anthony. This move discussion is a 1:1 tie between you and User:Bleaney so I was thinking of closing it as No Consensus to move. But instead, I'll try to persuade you that the move is a good idea :-). If you go into justice.gov.uk and you find this page, which contains no reference to 'Moorland Closed.' It's just plain old Moorland Prison. So in our terminology, Moorland (HM Prison) is the natural name for the article. Now we could still keep the present DAB page, Moorland Prison, but the two entries would send the reader to the new names of the two prisons.  What do you think?  EdJohnston (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Chuggington
I've reverted your strange reversion - explanation on the talk page. a_man_alone (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi

 * Could you merge my sandbox of Rihanna's California King Bed into the actual article here please? As well as the history of my sandbox so that the actual article has a record of the edits i have done. Thanks :) Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  14:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Regrettably, pages User:Calvin999/Sandbox6 and California King Bed have WP:Parallel histories, and thus a full history-merge cannot be done. User:Calvin999/Sandbox6 runs from 17:59, 23 July 2011 to 14:02, 30 July 2011; California King Bed runs from April 2011 or earlier to 23:04, 29 July 2011. While you were editing User:Calvin999/Sandbox6, people were still editing California King Bed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * What's the solution then? Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  15:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Make a note in Talk:California King Bed to say what happened. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So you're suggesting I copy and paste my sandbox into the article then? Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  15:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Did your sandbox start as a copy of California King Bed? Your sandbox's first edit at 17:59, 23 July 2011 has 27,892 bytes, but the last previous edits of California King Bed at 17:55, 23 July 2011 has 28,106 bytes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah I copied and pasted the current article into my sandbox, then made edits to the sandbox version. I haven't made an improvements or constructive edits to the actual article, only to my sandbox. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  16:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Your sandbox seems to have started as a copy of California King Bed at 17:55, 23 July 2011. I could history-split California King Bed and move its edits after that time to another name, and then move your sandbox's edit history in instead. But it would have been better for you to have edited page California King Bed directly instead. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Do whatever you can do so my sandbox version and it's history can be put into the actual article, just so that I am credited with those edits as I plan on proceeding with GAN. I know it's easier to directly edit the article, but it's harder when you try to make edits which are likely to get changed by someone else. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  16:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's fine now, don't worry. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  17:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Lost - against consensus?

 * Hi
 * I just wondered if this page move was against consensus, as per the discussion here. I have no vested interest, rather was looking at someone's contribs and noticed it. Chaosdruid (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * As it says, there was no concensus to move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, though I was hoping for an opinion on the move :¬) I have relisted it anyway. Chaosdruid (talk) 01:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Forts, rivers and lakes in India
More common than "X fort" is "X Fort": http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?depth=3&categories=Forts+in+India&sortby=title

I moved ca. 10, but the following 7 I could not, because there was a target page, maybe you can help.
 * Akola fort
 * Chandragiri fort
 * Karnala fort
 * Kuchesar fort
 * Laling fort
 * Panhala fort
 * Raigad fort

Same goes for rivers and lakes Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Adyar (River)
 * Ghaggar-Hakra river
 * Shivasagar lake
 * I have listed this move for discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Wrong term Karşılama
How much more discuss, about a wrong term (Karşılama)? It should have been turned in English. Consensus is admissible... -Karbont (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Merging external sites into Wiki articles
Do yo know how to merge CC text from external websites into Wiki articles? Can you contribute anything on the topic at Wikipedia_talk:GLAM/ARKive? or any of the other discussions about merging CC text from the ARKive website, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL. Snowman (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Video games developed in Japan mediation follow up
Anthony- I followed up on the implementation of changes to as a result of Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Video games developed in Japan. I posted at Template talk:Nihongo, but seem to have met with initial resistance. Given the touchy nature of what this is attached to, I was hoping you could help out in any way you can. Thanks for your time. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC))

Before It Explodes/version 2

 * I cannot figure out your reasons for this move. I hope I wasn't the cause by taking care off the move but forgetting to remove it from current requests, but can you explain why we would have a "version 2" of any page? Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If I had left those edits as deleted edits sitting under page Before It Explodes, it would have been liable to accidents if page Before It Explodes later had to be temporarily deleted: see WP:Parallel versions. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed quick clarification

 * Greetings Anthony! At Talk:Assassin's Creed (video game), were you meaning to say "and the existing Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed (series)"? Just thought I'd ask - cheers mate!    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 05:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Some Requests

 * The earliest version of Resistance 2 is a page move to Resistance 2 : Rise of Man. After some more page moves, the edit history ended up in Resistance: Fall of Man Sequel. I request a merged back with Resistance 2. The earliest version of Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is also a page move, in that case to Uncharted 2 (working title). I request a history undeletion & then merge. My other requests are for history undeletions of Resistance 3, Uncharted 2, Gears of War 2, & Gears of War 3. SNS (talk) 02:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * re Resistance 2. Apart from redirects: the last edit of Resistance: Fall of Man Sequel is before the first edit of Resistance 2, OK; but the last edit of Resistance: Fall of Man Sequel is very unlike the first edit of Resistance 2 and I do not see that they represent one continued edit history. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the 4 history-undeletes; Uncharted 2 had to be undeleted and then history-merged to Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:17, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Move "Windows Phone 7" to "Windows Phone"

 * We have reach consensus to move the Windows Phone 7 to its new name, . Because the "Windows Phone" article, which currently is a redirect, have major history, I am having difficulty performing this move. I have read the moving procedures but am still in need of assistance. Illegal Operation (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

are you still trolling?

 * are you still trolling or are you finally going to do this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bing_(search_engine)#Requested_move 02:53, 7 August 2011 User:Theoneintraining
 * As Talk:Bing (search engine) shows, this move is disputed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * no it's called a page move request, the only people disputing the move are NPOV trolls, if you want me to I will provide proff of all your bullshit to stop this move from happening, I remember what you said about a year ago. We know you love google and that's fine, your roll as a wikipedia admin is to put your differences aside. 08:51, 8 August 2011 User:182.239.207.90
 * Trolls or not, I better wait until this move discussion has run its term. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Further corrections relating to Peace Oil (UK)
Hi Anthony, thank you for removing the false information in my request of 20th July, headed 'Error on a disambiguation page'. Yes, "no such report" should have been "no such support"; apologies for the typo. I have a further request: on the actual Peace Oil (UK) page, it states that "the oil was launched at an Israel Expo Day organised by the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland". Dame Hilary Blume, the director of the Charities Advisory Trust, has told me that this is also untrue. There is no connection between Peace Oil (UK) and the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. Peace Oil was sold at a stall at the Israel Expo Day, just as it is sold through many other outlets, such as churches, synagogues and shops. However, the idea was launched at a reception at the House of Commons on 5th November 2001. The first batch went on sale in 2006. CAT2011 (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Boston English

 * Tried to move Boston accent to Boston English. It failed because there is now a (rather useless) dab page. Can't quite figure out how to do away with the dab page. Of course, it will get reverted. I'll be the third to have tried it! Maybe after 50 attempts, they'll allow it! :) Student7 (talk) 22:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * See discussion at Talk:Boston accent. I put in a hatlink about the school. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

SCBA

 * Hi. I'm uncertain as to why you undid my grammar correction on the SCBA page.  Could you comment?  Thanks --Badger151 (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, OK, I have re-reverted it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

History Merge Requests

 * I request a history undeletion of Spy Kids 4 & then merge with Spy Kids: All the Time in the World. I request a merge of Reboot Ralph with Wreck-It Ralph. SNS (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Spy Kids 4 (old deleted edits) to Spy Kids: All the Time in the World Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Reboot Ralph to Wreck-It Ralph: Reboot Ralph's history is largely redirects, and what edits are text have no apparent edit continuity with the start of the history of Wreck-It Ralph. And the history of Reboot Ralph (2012 film) complicates matters. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Majority move for a page

 * Really... there is a "majority to move, not just a "consensus to move" or "better arguments to move." I have lost move requests in the past with 65% of the votes saying to move... and now a two vote majority happens and you move the page? There's always something new surprising me at wikipedia. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It was in the backlog and so needed sorting out. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Backlog? Wasn't it up for only a week? Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

La Spirotechnique

 * Hello, you old British diver. I completed and brought the proper official name at an article that you created. Please, could you bring any needed correction to Aqua Lung/La Spirotechnique? You did it for former contributions of mine... so I thought you could do it again... Just tell me, please, if there's any problem I'll ask somebody else. Best regards, from a diver to another. Kintaro (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) Kintaro (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Sophie Lefevre - what the heck?

 * You moved a page where the talking consensus just a week ago was to keep at Sophie Lefevre. Instead you moved it as "uncontroversial." Please move it back because an error was made here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As I researched it I see the request was for an "uncontroversial" move by Mayumashu. You were obviously just doing your job and I would guess that would be to assume the editor was asking for the move in good faith. That turns out not to be the case and he should be told as such after the page is moved back. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Uncharted
Uncharted started as a cut & paste of Uncharted (series). SNS (talk) 02:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Sydney New Year's Eve
Hey Anthony. Ages ago you changed the Sydney New Year's Eve article to "Sydney New Year's Eve Fireworks" for me but now I believe this is wrong and should be reverted back. The event currently features: Pre-Show Entertainment, Indigenous Smoking Ceremony, 9pm Family Fireworks, Harbour of Light Parade, Midnight Fireworks and more. AnimatedZebra (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Harmonielehre move

 * Hello. I see you've made the move of Harmonielehre (John Adams) to Harmonielehre requested by User:Svick. I'm terribly sorry, but I was in the middle of trying to figure out how to contest this move (my first attempt at this, and the process isn't documented very clearly). The reason for doubting it is that Harmonielehre is also the title of a historically significany book by Arnold Schoenberg (the first listed at Arnold Schoenberg). Is there anything that can be done now? I would be willing to create the desired disambiguation page. --Stfg (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have put a hatlink in page Harmonielehre. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That's perfect. --Stfg (talk) 16:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Otis Redding histmerge

 * hello,
 * thank you for the histmerge. However, is it possible to remove the four last revisions and to restore the former history of Otis Redding?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 09:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure if you understood me; there are four revisions at the end that should be removed. Also can you merge the history from Otis Redding/version 1 to Otis Redding?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 09:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Your link to the history of Otis Redding was with an offset that made it list ignoring the last 50 edits, as caused by the "dir=prev" in its URL: "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Otis_Redding&dir=prev&action=history": your "last 4 edits" are the 51st to 54th edits from last. And, pages Otis Redding and Otis Redding/version 1 have WP:Parallel histories and therefore the two cannot sensibly be history-merged. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * "last" is ambivalent; what I meant are the very first (or last, doesn't matter) 3 (not 4, as histmerge doesn't go) revisions, and . Is it possible to remove a revision completely?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite  10:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If you mean the first (= bottom-most, oldest) edits of page Otis Redding, if they are part of the history of that page, they may as well stay there. They are not doing any harm, since there is no good reason to history-merge Otis Redding/version 1 in, as I explain hereinabove. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem is that the original old history of Otis Redding is not displaying. Explain to me why the former history is still displaying in List of channels on Zattoo, which you histmerged. Why didn't you do the same here?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 13:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, the significant dates in the history of page Otis Redding are:
 * 1st edit: 16:54, 10 April 2011 GreatOrangePumpkin (3,416 bytes)
 * 5th edit, first major change of page size: 19:01, 1 August 2011 GreatOrangePumpkin (26,843 bytes)
 * The history of page Otis Redding/version 1 starts at 19:25, 15 November 2002, and by August 2011 its size is running at about 24000 (± 800 or so) bytes. To me these 2 histories look separate. There may have been partial copy-and-pastings between them. I do not know if some edits relevant to Otis Redding are now (deleted or undeleted) in a third page that I do not know of. Otis Redding has one deleted edit (a redirect). Otis Redding/version 1 has no deleted edits. There are no deleted edits at User:GreatOrangePumpkin/Sandbox18. History-merging cannot cater for the results of merging the texts of 2 pages, or splitting a page into two pages, or starting a page which is a duplicate of another page which is not blanked but left for people to keep on editing it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understood, you did the "troublesome case". Thanks for the explanation =). -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey <sup style="color:#DCDCDC;">it's me <sub style="color:#DCDCDC;">I am dynamite 14:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you undo it, i.e. restoring the history; see also this GA nomination.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ <sub style="color:#DCDCDC;">Hey <sup style="color:#DCDCDC;">it's me 11:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That would need me to history-merge part of Otis Redding/version 1 into Otis Redding, thus breaking one history to reassemble another history. Please explain exactly what you want me to move to where. And please what is the role of page List of channels on Zattoo in this? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Anthony. Looking at the current situation it appear to me that the original Otis Redding article was moved to Otis Redding/version 1 and that contains all the history up to 18 August 2011. Some form of sandbox version (found it - User:GreatOrangePumpkin/Sandbox18) was then moved to Otis Redding, and this only contains the history of the sandbox, plus the history since the move. My suggestion is that Otis Redding is moved to User:GreatOrangePumpkin/Sandbox18, and Otis Redding/version 1 is moved to Otis Redding, and then the history of User:GreatOrangePumpkin/Sandbox18 from 18 August 2011 to the present is merged into Otis Redding along with the contents, and a merge note is put on the talkpage of Otis Redding linking to User:GreatOrangePumpkin/Sandbox18 in order to pick up the parallel history from 10 April 2011 to 18 August 2011. Does that make sense? Currently people are going to be confused that an article which has existed on Wikipedia since at least November 2002, appears to have been created in April of this year.  SilkTork  <font color="#347C2C">✔Tea time  15:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * But, Otis Redding/version 1 in its last few edits including 16:28, 18 August 2011‎ runs steadily at about 25800 bytes, but Otis Redding runs through 18 August 2011 at about 39000 bytes. It seems that there was an old established page about the singer Otis Redding, and years later someone started a new sandbox page about Otis Redding, incorporating parts of the old Otis Redding page and new self-written matter, and developed it while people were also editing the old Otis Redding page, and he moved that sandbox page (by the proper means, or by cut-and-paste which has now been mended) to the name Otis Redding: if so, then the new Otis Redding page is more continuous with the sandbox replacement than with the old Otis Redding page, and this is history and what happened and cannot be helped. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. Unfortunately I am unable to follow your explanation. My understanding is that the history of a page shows who contributed what and when, and holds previous versions of a page which can be accessed and copied or edited. The history of the current Otis Redding only shows a fraction of that information. Your explanation of "runs steadily at about 25800 bytes" makes no sense to me. What does that mean? What I can see is that nobody can access the older history, and if the current version (after the sandbox merge) is seen to be nonsense or a copyvio, then an editor would have difficultly finding and accessing a previous version to be restored. Would you mind if I had a go at restoring the history?  SilkTork  <font color="#347C2C">✔Tea time  16:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * "Page X runs at about n bytes" means that around the time in question the page's size varies somewhat but is always near n bytes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How about moving Otis Redding to Sandbox 18 and Otis Redding/version 1 to Otis Redding, like explained above, but just c&p the current version back to Otis Redding. Is that possible?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ <sub style="color:#DCDCDC;">Hey <sup style="color:#DCDCDC;">it's me 16:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think we are looking at this from different perspectives. You appear to be looking in terms of size. That seems to me, as regards the contribution and content history, to be irrelevant. Content can be added and removed at any time. Such content may alter the size (or amount of bytes), but such information is of little consequence as the content may be copyvio, may be garbage, may be vandalism, may be a mistake. What matters here is the contribution history, and the ability to verify content, and to restore earlier versions. I am aware that you have experience and skill in history merges, so I would prefer to defer to you, but I am puzzled by your answers, and remain concerned by the condition of Otis Redding/version 1 and Otis Redding. I believe you are indicating that you don't wish to do any more work on this matter, which is fine. I will do the history merge.  SilkTork  <font color="#347C2C">✔Tea time  19:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I will have to look at this in the morning. It is 11.20 pm here in England. Those 2 pages were being edited in parallel for a long time, and likely in that time there were several partial copy-and-pastes between them. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The bulk of the parallel editing was sandbox editing. GreatOrangePumpkin may be able to provide some info on that. Normally with sandbox editing it is usually just one editor, and the same editor is the one who then merges the material into the mainspace article, so that single edit acts as attribution and history. There appears to be a slight period of cross editing, which if I was to sort out the overall history, I wouldn't attempt to individually history merge, but I would provide a link to the sub-article on the talkpage of the main article. The aim would be to have the previous history up the the merge, the recent history, and sandwiched in between, one version of the short parallel history, with a link to the sub-article for the other half of the parallel history. Does that make sense to you?  SilkTork  <font color="#347C2C">✔Tea time  00:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The edit being mostly discussed here, to the former sandbox page (now at Otis Redding) (matter moved in from (what is now) Otis Redding/version 1), seems to be this diff (15:45, 18 August 2011‎ by GreatOrangePumpkin (38,288 bytes) (pasted from main)); it is a fairly minor change to one paragraph.
 * The former sandbox page (now at Otis Redding) starts with 4 stub edits (merely a list of when the musician played), followed by 19:01, 1 August 2011‎ GreatOrangePumpkin (26,843 bytes), which may have been a copy-and-paste of an edit (15:08, 1 August 2011‎ Stagehand (24,844 bytes) (Memorial Plaque)) of Otis Redding/version 1: see this diff.
 * But around 18 August 2011‎ the text differences between Otis Redding and Otis Redding/version 1 are much greater, as seen by the difference of page length (38,288 versus 25,778 bytes). (I earlier history-transferred between these 2 pages, as was requested, but a bit later I doubted the rightness of this and reversed the history-transfer.)
 * I have put an edit history note in Talk:Otis Redding; that note links to Otis Redding/version 1.
 * The bulk of the parallel editing was sandbox editing: But if meanwhile the non-sandbox page has major edits, there are thereby WP:Parallel histories, and after that, when the editor replaces the text of the non-sandbox page by the text of the sandbox page, that is merely another discontinuity-causing cut-and-paste move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:RM
You removed my request without it being done. I am still seeking for Noitamina to be moved back to NoitaminA.— Ryūlóng (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 23:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * MOS:TM says, "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official""—it should probably stay at Noitamina and be written as "Noitamina" in the text. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, nevermind that. Anthony moved the discussion here: Talk:Noitamina. Please follow that discussion if you are interested in moving this article. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

"Harry Potter and the ..."

 * Hello. You reverted my edit on the Lord Voldemort page some time ago and explained that we should "use full names, for correct information". I want to tell you why I disagree with the revert. :)
 * The writing in that paragraph is extremely tiresome, so much so that when I first saw it I just skipped to the end of it. Technically, the shortened titles are not the 'correct' ones, but prose is very important as well. I think that if we use "Harry Potter and the" only in the first entry in the list, and in all subsequent entries we use only the 'subtitle' everything should be perfectly clear (especially since the films have been mentioned before in the article).
 * Also, we &mdash; when reading and writing that article &mdash; are under the "Harry Potter" context. We can take advantage of that and avoid necessary verbosity, whihc will make the article easier to read. -- Diego_pmc  Talk 10:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As this is the first time that each of the films is mentioned in this article, the full names should be given. Elegant variation can be confusing and is to be avoided. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

2011 England riots
Hello Anthony. There has been a history of edit warring over the infobox location details in 2011 England riots. To try to stabilise this, and raise another closely related issue, I've started a discussion topic here: Talk:2011 England riots. Since you've made many contributions to the article, I'd be grateful if you would come and comment. Thanks. <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;"> Rubywine. talk 01:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Union of the Democratic Centre (Spain)

 * Just to let you know, I've reverted this page move, as I disagree that it's uncontroversial and have explained why on the articles talk page. The editor who proposed the move didn't post any notification of it on the article's talk page so I missed the request on the page move requests. Valenciano (talk) 07:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Union of the Democratic Centre (Spain). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom Case: Abortion
You have been added to the list of parties for Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion as of September 1, 2011, as instructed by the Arbitration Committee. Although you are added after the case has already been opened for an amount of time, the arbitrators have instructed to give you a minimum of seven days to present evidence with regards to that case. If you require more time, please let me know.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 04:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

histmerge
What is better: placing the histmerge template or adding the request to "talkpage"? (thanks for doing such jobs) <b style="font-family:Courier New; display:inline; border:#009 1px dashed; padding:1px 6px 2px 7px; white-space:nowrap; color:#000000; font-size:smaller;">mabdul</b> 22:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Jetpack (disambiguation)

 * Can you explain your reversion of my change (I quoted a wp guideline in my edit summary) ? Explaining reversions is a big help for those of us still learning how to contribute. DexDor (talk) 08:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The deleted entries looked relevant to me. OK, I have re-reverted it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Propose restore Heave offering to English
Hi Anthony, I'm proposing to restore this recent move back to English per Naming conventions (use English). I do realise that a lot of extra material related to later rabbinical interpretation of this concept was added, but nevertheless even the WP:RS dealing with the rabbinical applications use English not terumah in the body of English text. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Wet (Snoop Dogg song)

 * Hi Anthony, might you be able to fix this, as an editor moved Wet (song) to the mis-spelled Wet (Snoop Dog song) which has a g in Dogg missing. So that's three titles it went through. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ I moved Wet (Snoop Dog song) to Wet (Snoop Dogg song) as plain move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Amyabaker/Noddle
Hi Anthony. Would you unprotect User:Amyabaker/Noddle for me so I can update the draft with my changes? See Deletion review/Log/2011 September 3 for background about the speedy deletion. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 08:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have replied at User talk:Ron Ritzman. Cunard (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for settling Big Show and Kane for me :) Starship.paint (talk) 10:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

SCOOP

 * Hi, can you please explain why did you decline my request to move SCOOP to SCOOP (software)? Rymatz (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought it may prove controversial, so I started a move discussion at Talk:SCOOP. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pitchblend for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pitchblend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pitchblend until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pitchblend


A tag has been placed on Pitchblend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Johannes von Ronge, etc.
Thanks for sorting out those three pages as best you could. It was a manic set of reversion last night. I've done some fairly simple cut and paste repairs, but this one took the biscuit. I've re-protected those two redirects you left - there are some editors out there with very strong views on the name. This way they will have to contribute to the move request you started.  Ron h jones (Talk) 18:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Question

 * Could I ask you question. It's obvious that I totally messed up.  If you type in KPSL-FM in the search box, that's the article for the KPSL-FM that was deleted.  That probably needs to be moved into the deleted article.  Hopefully, I put the right box, so you guys know to move that over there.  Don't know how, but just wanted to give you a heads up.  The question I wanted to ask is, when making moves like that, you move the article it self, not start a whole new article.  That's what I did wrong.  Needed to move the whole article itself.  Sorry about all the work, but wanted to let you know about the KPSL-FM that was deleted, and the KPSL-FM, if you type that in the search box, you'll see that article on there.  Just when you get the chance, I'll let you work on getting that on that page.  Thanks a whole lot.  I'm not moving anything on that page.  Don't want to mess it up, if you understand.  Thanks.  (JoeCool950 (talk) 06:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC))
 * No histmerge done: nothing to histmerge: KPSL (FM)'s history is 2 redirects & a blanking; KPSL-FM's deleted history is 2 redirects. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

An accident

 * Hello Anthony Appleyard, I am very sorry, but I made an formal error: I have moved the article "Siphon (mollusc)" and AFTER then I have realized, that it was formally "against" the previous "move request", where there were only two opinions (each of them contradicting each other). I would like to assure you, that I made this my mistake unintentionally and I wanted to personally inform you about it. I would like to also tell you, that I really appreciate your opinion. Solving this will probably require more opinions from more wikipedians. Thank you for your understanding. Have a nice day. --Snek01 (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have moved it back to Siphon (mollusc anatomy). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Sirtos

 * Hello my friend, I demand an immediate change of article syrtos, cause its obvious that throughout the article and other sections referred to, as SIRTOS (nowhere as: syrtos) something that you may didn't noticed, so I removed the section you added in talk page as unnecessary. in any case, thank you! --Ecogmtehs (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have restored the move discussion section. Please let discussion proceed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Snagit move ;) --danhash (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Johannes von Ronge
Vegaswikian closed, and then at my request, reopened discussion of what title the Johannes von Ronge/Johannes von Rönge/Johannes Ronge article should have. Since I think the way we've been describing what we as individual editors see as the appropriate title, I am asking prior participants to !vote explicitly on each of the three options at Talk:Johannes von Ronge, hence this notice. The article has also been listed at WP:RM. Thank you for your participation, --Nuujinn (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick reminder of Saturday's wikimeet
Hi Anthony, this is just a quick reminder about the Manchester wikimeet this Saturday (17th September). Hope you can still make it. Mike Peel (talk) 22:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Capitalization of common names of animal species
Hello. Just letting you know that I've posted the following at a number of project talk pages:

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

RSCS

 * I believe you are holding my post on RSCS for review because I am new here. I just wanted to add that I have figured out how to use references properly and have corrected them in my latest draft.  George.McQuilken (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I can find nothing about RSCS in this talk page or in its last 2 archives. Page RSCS was about "Remote Spooling Communications Subsystem" and on 7 January 2008 was tagged as "possible copyvio of http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/rscs", and on 9 January 2008 was deleted (not by me) as copyvio, and in August 2011 was re-created as merely "RSCS: Remote Spooling Communications Subsystem" and deleted (not by me) as "Article has no meaningful, substantive content)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Paraveterinary workers

 * Hi there,
 * I think you're an admin, and maybe you can help. You just put a redirect in place from talk:paraveteniary workers to talk:paraveterinary workers in north america, however due to two editors working simultaneously, the page has become disjointed.  The paraveterinary workers page still exists, but has become split from its talk page.  Are you able to help by moving the talk page back to the correct place, over the redirect you just created?  It would be much appreciated.  Regards, OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 10:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Pages Paraveterinary workers in North America and Paraveterinary workers (and several others, see ) both exist. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Bigfin reef squid
Thank you very much. :) --  Obsidi ♠ n   Soul   08:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Histmerge query

 * Hi Anthony, I see that you're familiar with Histmerges. I have a question for you about this. I took an article, "One Tree Hill", and expanded it at User:Melicans/One Tree Hill. I've finished my expansion but am unsure how to go about this next. I want to move the content back, but with the history accompanying it. Do I copy-and-paste the text back into the original article and then request a histmerge (I attempted this a few days ago with Exit (song), which was declined for reasons I don't fully understand). Do I do a physical move and somehow get a histmerge from that? I'm not quite sure how to go about this. Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Histmerge ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I hate to be a bother but I did the same thing with Exit (song) a few days, which I developed at User:Melicans/Exit. When I put a histmerge request there it was denied. I was wondering what the difference between them is and why it was denied for that article? Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, thank you. I'm curious; do you know why it was denied the first time? Melicans (talk, contributions) 16:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Article Move

 * Dear Anthony Appleyard, please move Guru Teg Bahadur Khalsa Senior Secondary School, Malout to Guru Tegh Bahadur Khalsa Senior Secondary School, Malout. The word Tegh is misspelled in the former name. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Arab Slave Trade

 * Hi If you have moved it per the request why is it still saying Islamic Slave trade while the file is saying Arab slave trade? The point of the move was to restore it before the vandal changed it.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * God only knows. Some sort of system hang-up? It seems to be right now. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry Islamic slave trade should point to Islamic views on slavery not back to Arab. Thanks--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Geographic information retrieval
Anthony, thanks for moving that uncontroversial one. There are an awful lot of poorly formatted article names, sadly. Tony  (talk)  09:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Merging the history of a sub-page in user space into a pre-existing article
You were recently mentioned in passing in a now closed ANI ("Merging the history of a sub-page in user space into a pre-existing article") Do you merge user space histories into existing articles? As I do not watch your talk page please make any reply on mine. -- PBS (talk) 04:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. It seems to me that we need a guideline in this area, so I'll probably bring it up at village pump. If I do so I'll inform you. -- PBS (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

WNWC
I don't routinely monitor the requested moves page so I was caught unaware when this so-called uncontroversial request was made. I've moved WNWC (AM) back to its proper name as there are no FCC-licensed radio stations in the United States with a legal -AM suffix to their call signs. Per Wikipedia and WP:WPRS naming conventions, when a two or more stations share a base call sign, the article is disambiguated with the type of broadcasting (usually AM for AM/FM combos, sometimes FM for FM/TV combos) and a disambiguation page is created at the base call sign. There are countless examples of this for radio station articles from coast to coast. - Dravecky (talk) 05:59, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Yurukikos ?

 * Hi, Anthony Appleyard. Could you see Talk:Yurukikos ? Takabeg (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Wamba/version 2

 * You should perhaps delete this. Srnec (talk) 23:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Aa goodyearblimp 00.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aa goodyearblimp 00.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AirCare (medevac system)


The article AirCare (medevac system) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not assert notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ΔT The only constant 04:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of AirCare (medevac system) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirCare (medevac system) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AirCare (medevac system) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ΔT The only constant 17:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Why did you revert the edit to heavy equipment
?? Granite07 (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Histmerge request

 * Hi Anthony. I just stumbled upon a set of articles with interesting histories. The relevant articles are Agony (comics), Leslie Gesneria (comics), Leslie Gesneria and Leslie (comics). From what I can tell, I think only one histmerge will be needed/possible. Anyway, here's how I see it:
 * Article originally created at Agony (comics) and the majority of the history is there.
 * On 15 April 2007‎ Agony (comics) was cut-and-paste moved to Leslie (comics) and then later that day was again cut-and-paste moved to Leslie Gesneria (comics). This was reverted on 18 April 2007 and the article was again at Agony (comics) – I don't think a histmerge is desired here because the cut-and-paste move was simply reverted, not cut-and-paste moved back, so no new content was added.
 * On 1 September 2007 Agony (comics) was cut-and-paste moved to Leslie Gesneria. The article was very slightly expanded before an IP tried to cut-and-paste move back to Agony (comics) on 8 September 2007. The IP was reverted on both articles by a bot. On 16 September 2007 a different IP successfully cut-and-paste moved back to Agony (comics) – I'm not sure if it would useful to histmerge some edits to Leslie Gesneria (ranging from the first edit to the edits by 67.141.242.250; the edits from Phgao would not be of any value) into the Agony (comics). You would get a few junk redirect edits, but the article was slightly expanded (including two sources being added).
 * On 17 November 2007 Agony (comics) was again cut-and-paste moved, this time to Leslie Gesneria (comics). The article stayed at that title until 19 June 2008 when it was cut-and-paste moved back to Agony (comics) – I think a histmerge is required here. There are no overlapping edits and the article significantly changed in the months it was at Leslie Gesneria (comics).
 * So I'm hoping that made sense and you'll be able to try and sort this out when you have some spare time. All the best, Jenks24 (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ #3 and #4. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Kingsoft

 * Why this revert? The exact same link is already in the external links section, and the article has no references. 2.26.128.165 (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I have re-reverted my revert. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 2.26.128.165 (talk) 22:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Question (2)

 * Hello !
 * I noticed you respond to merging requests and I have a question as I am not certain which noticeboard should I use for my request. A page was moved under a different name without any discussion and, under its new name, it does not correspond to the naming convention of the article series. I am talking about People's Republic of Bulgaria, which was renamed to History of Bulgaria during communism. Under its new name it does not correspond accordingly to the other Eastern Bloc country articles (Socialist Republic of Romania, East Germany etc.) but I am not aware how to move it back to its original title. I would appreciate your help. Best, - ☣Tourbillon A ? 14:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! - ☣Tourbillon A ? 08:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Cranes
Thanks for this reversion  I fully support it. Rvancopp's additions have been useful and measured: there might be a shared interest here, but I see no conflict. Nor do I feel particularly happy when an account makes no other edits than to scream loudly about someone else's "unfair" editing.

Thanks for reverting this, you beat me to it (a busy week, no time for editing anything). Andy Dingley (talk) 22:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Lesley Gesneria

 * Why did you move this page back to being listed as Agony, a fan fiction name that has never appeared in any comic or Marvel publication? 31.53.35.201 (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * This was the result of a history-merge. I have now moved it back. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm wondering if you can move this entry again. Another editor, ignoring the discussion on the talk page and going from what he admitted was vague belief they'd been given official codenames, rather than having checked the facts, moved it back to the unofficial fan name. He similarly reverted the other moved symbiote page to Phage, another unofficial fan name. 90.219.225.168 (talk) 14:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have moved Agony (comics) to Leslie Gesneria (comics). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Can you do the same to Phage (comics), move it to Carl Mach (comics), for the same reason? DeadpoolRP (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:54, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

histmerge request (Brett Sutton)

 * Would it be possible for you to merger the history at User:NSH001/sandbox into Brett Sutton? There is a handful of overlapping edits, but I'm hoping these won't create too big a problem. Since most of the effort behind the current article is in the sandbox version, it seems appropriate that they should appear in the main article history. Many thanks, NSH001 (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You are already attributed in the article history when you rewrote the article in this diff. What purpose would it serve to put the sandbox test edits in the article history? Hekerui (talk) 20:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry: I can find no mention of my name in the edit histories of Brett Sutton or User:NSH001/sandbox, and their deletion/etc logs are empty. The diff that you linked to, is for an edit by User:NSH001, who seems to have copied much text in there: but where from? and was it a cut-and-paste or a copy-and-paste or what? Regrettably, textmerge cannot help with text-splitting or text-merging or text-duplicating, or with a partial copy-and-paste; you will have to put a history note section in the article's talk page saying what happened. See WP:Parallel histories. (It is 11.20 pm here in England and I am ready to go to bed.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in replying (various matters have kept me away from Wikipedia). Firstly Hekerui's remark was, I think, intended to be addressed to me, although he appeared to address it to Anthony. Hence the obvious confusion going on here. I am, of course, aware that it would be possible to put an article talk page note referring to the sandbox version for the full article history, but I'm reluctant to leave what looks like a full mainspace article lying around indefinitely in user space, solely in order to keep a record of the history. Deleting the sandbox version isn't great either. From my point of view, a history merge would be the best solution, but if that is not possible because of WP:Parallel histories, or if it is simply too much work, I will accept your (Anthony's) decision and have to ponder what to do. (For the record, there is almost nothing in common between the previous version of the article (or any of its history) and the current one. If the AfD had succeeded, that would have neatly solved the problem.) --NSH001 (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Another histmerge request
Thanks for carrying, Anthony. Happened to glance through the contribs of the user who made that mess and found two others: Carl (comics), Phage (comics), Carl Mach (comics) and Carl Mach are one set; the other is Riot (comics), Trevor (comics) and Trevor Cole (comics). I'd appreciate it if you could take the appropriate action when you get a chance. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Brigette Barcley/Grant history merge
Many thanks for that. Sparthorse (talk) 15:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for moving C. A. Patrides! Kiefer .Wolfowitz 23:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Pot O' Gold / Pot O' Gold (Glee)
Hi Anthony, I see you've just moved this article per an uncontroversial request at WP:RM. I just wanted to draw your attention to this discussion on the talk page, where the subject of disambiguation had previously been discussed, and per the WP:CAPS guideline, deemed not to be a necessity. I think in this case, a move discussion might have been—or indeed might still be—beneficial. Frickative 12:28, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Nisbet, Roxburghshire
Hi Anthony. I'm a bit puzzled by what happened to the technical move request on this one. Your edit summary for the group of four technical move requests states "Done 3, discuss 1", but this one seems neither to have been done, nor to have been relisted as controversial. Am I missing something? Skinsmoke (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Just noticed the timing of your edit summary. It could be that I've blundered in while you were part-way through dealing with it and got distracted by the Glee thing!  Skinsmoke (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Cut-and-Paste repair pen
I also appreciate your work on Sons (2006 film)! __meco (talk) 16:45, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for your contributuion to the Canid Infertility Chart! Chrisrus (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

If you would, could I run some ideas for the chart by you? Chrisrus (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * User talk:Chrisrus, Canid hybrid Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification (for Anthony Appleyard)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Expletive deleted (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to Expletive

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, I knew you'd come up sooner or later. I've written a bot that notifies editors when they've created dablinks, but I know most of your "dablink creation" comes during regular maintenance tasks, such as history merges, so you may want to use the bots template to block DPL bot from pestering you - specifically: anywhere on your talk. It would not block other bots. Cheers, -- Ja Ga <font color="#000000" size="-1">talk  18:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

FYI...

 * Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents —Eustress talk 13:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Now at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive727. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations
<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black">Buster Seven  <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black"> Talk  16:50, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

New attempt to sort out old problems on DIR
Hi Anthony, I am trying to improve the DIR article, See Talk:Doing It Right. You have previously contributed to attempts to improve the article and may be interested to comment or contribute. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Replied at Talk:Cell (Dragon Ball). Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Requests

 * I request a history merge of Bond 23 & Skyfall. I also request a history undeletion of Grand Theft Auto V. SNS (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Grand Theft Auto V.
 * Bond 23 to Skyfall: no edit continuity, 6 edits WP:Parallel histories at the end, and much of the history of Bond 23 is commented redirects. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

TO DO

 * a search, Impossible colors, Opponent process, Imaginary color, Color Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Canoe River train crash
Hi, I reverted one of your edits. It struck me that both British Columbia andPrince George, British Columbia were already linked, and there was no really long gap to necessitate another link. If you feel strongly about it, just change it back.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your user page
I don't generally mess around with people's user pages – and, frankly, have a certain amount of respect for editors who don't pay that much attention to theirs. But yours currently contains a bit of vandalism, from this edit way back in April 2010. From what I know of you, you deserve better, so I'm going to revert it.

If I'm wrong and you actually wanted to keep it, well ... That would mean you're stranger than I took you for.

Regards, --88.104.41.22 (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

American Mafia

 * Renaming American Mafia to American mafia as a non-controversial, technical move 9½ hours after a request was posted and with no notification to editors on the article talk page seems a bit premature. Although the original requester states unequivocally that Mafia is "Not a proper name like Cosa Nostra", Merriam-Webster, The Free Dictionary, and Dictionary.com (citing Random House Dictionary, Collins English Dictionary, and The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy) would appear to disagree in cases where, as in this article, the word refers to a specific organization. Please restore the original article title and help ensure (I've never had to visit the Requested moves page before) that a true consensus to rename exists. Thanx. Fat&#38;Happy (talk) 07:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * TY. Fat&#38;Happy (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Operation Nordlicht/Northern Light

 * I noticed you moved one of these pages recently per RM (my mistake, I didn't delete the template). They've now been moved again, despite the explanations given on the talk pages. I’ve opened a discussion, here; perhaps you’d care to comment? Xyl 54 (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have answered at Talk:Operation Nordlicht. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to reply
 * I have to say I was pretty pissed off when I saw this; having spent a fair amount of time sorting this out last year, and doing the same just now, it was frustrating to see that work binned. Though I have to say I’m more annoyed with the IP for tagging it, as I didn’t see it as a cut and paste move(I’d undone the previous edit blanking and redirecting the page, which restored the content). And it seemed a pretty sophisticated thing for an anonymous someone, who'd only been here a month, to be doing.
 * I am also unclear of the value of this histmerge process; if the fault of a C&P move is that the edit history is separated, and attribution unclear, it is at least unmuddled. The remedy seems make the situation worse. Previously it was possible to trace an article’s history, and to reconstruct what was done and why. Now, it really isn’t; with two sets of edits in strictly chronological order an edit doesn’t necessarily relate to the one before, or the one after, and a proportion of them are deleted altogether (like the one I was referring to). It also means (in this case) the explanations don’t make much sense, and probably need redacting.
 * Wouldn’t it be better (and avoid having to spend silly amounts of time!) just to have the attributions clarified, as with WP:MERGE? Xyl 54 (talk) 12:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Talk:Operation Nordlicht shows, that I did not do any history-merging here. I split off the Iraq edits from the WWII German edits. Did someone else did a history merge to any of these pages? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I’m not at all sure what’s happened, by now; IIRC there was a page at Northern Lights on the Iraq op, a page at Nordlicht on the German ops, and a page at Sinyavin Offensive on the Soviet op, with an explanation on each talk page saying how they'd got there. I know 70.24.248.23 tagged the Nordlicht page, you moved some stuff, then Fastily moved some stuff. So now we have the same arrangement, but with three opaque edit histories.
 * It’s pretty academic now (and there’s nothing to be done about it); and if I sounded testy before, it wasn’t meant to be. But my questioning of the process was meant; is this really the best approach? Wouldn’t a tidying up of any attribution needed be more effective, less complicated, less time-consuming, (especially) less final? Xyl 54 (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Someone wrote a page about the Iraq operation. Someone else overwrote it with a page about the WWII German operation. That page with all its history was moved to name Operation Nordlicht. That is the page that I history-split. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah! Presumably then, Fastily merged the page histories for Norhern Light and Nordlicht; with this, maybe. Oh, well, can't be helped... Xyl 54 (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for 2011 M5 motorway crash
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion closed
An arbitration case regarding all articles related to the subject of Abortion has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:


 * All articles related to the subject of Abortion:
 * shall be semi-protected until November 28, 2014;
 * shall not be moved absent a demonstrable community consensus;
 * are authorized to be placed on Standard discretionary sanctions;

In addition:
 * 1) Editors are reminded to remain neutral while editing;
 * 2) Structured discussion is to take place on names of articles currently located at Opposition to the legalization of abortion and Support for the legalization of abortion, with a binding vote taken one month after the opening of the discussion;
 * 3) User:Orangemarlin is instructed to contact the Arbitration Committee before returning to edit affected articles;
 * 4) User:Michael C Price, User:Anythingyouwant, User:Haymaker, User:Geremia, User:DMSBel are all indefinitely topic-banned; User:Michael C Price and User:Haymaker may appeal their topic bans in one year;
 * 5) User:Gandydancer and User:NYyankees51 are reminded to maintain tones appropriate for collaboration in a sensitive topic area.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 04:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Chinese striped hamster
Thanks for fixing my move goof-up. ~ Lhynard (talk) 06:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Aa edgmond from heli 20070506.jpg

 * A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aa edgmond from heli 20070506.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * See answer in Possibly unfree files/2011 November 29. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

History Merge
Thank you for the history merge for Derek Branning, very quick. GSorby –  Ping!  23:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Aa 2workman with salvuses on cleanup job.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aa 2workman with salvuses on cleanup job.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Primacy of the Roman Pontiff
Please see this comment. Esoglou (talk) 10:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

another histmerge?

 * Please have a look at User:Shalini61290/Sandbox and Private sector banks in India. Seems like parallel histories, or? <b style="font-family:Courier New; display:inline; border:#009 1px dashed; padding:1px 6px 2px 7px; white-space:nowrap; color:#000000; font-size:smaller;">mabdul</b> 14:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are WP:Parallel histories. They should not be histmerged. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion
Resolved by motion at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification that: The Abortion case is supplemented as follows: Remedy 1 of Abortion is amended to the following:
 * Any uninvolved administrator may semi-protect articles relating to Abortion and their corresponding talk pages, at his or her discretion, for a period of up to three years from 7 December 2011. Pages semi-protected under this provision are to be logged.

For the Arbitration Committee, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Discuss this

Kralan to Khao Larm

 * I only just started reading up on the Kralan/Khao Larm articles and it seems as if User:Pelaisse has hijacked a legitimate article about the Cambodian dish called kralan and changed it to the Thai dish called khao larm/Khao lam. I would ask you to revert the merging of the articles again and reinstate the article Kralan in its original state before user Pelaisse started messing around with it. The same user also changed the text in this image to mention that it was made in Thailand instead of Cambodia. It would also seem appropriate to warn user Pelaisse about his actions. - Takeaway (talk) 17:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! You are fast! - Takeaway (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Relisting move proposals for 5 O'Clock and 5 O'clock (song)
I hope this is ok, but I have re-listed the articles 5 O'Clock and 5 O'clock (song) with a move proposal together at 5 O'clock (song)'s talk page here: Talk:5 O'clock (song). I asked on said talk page whether or not I should do so and waited 24 hrs with no response so I just went ahead and did it. There is also new evidence to consider regarding why they should be moved and my move proposal involves slightly different proposed names then others have proposed before. I hope that this helps make things clearer for everyone and not more confusing :-) I am letting all the editors who were involved in recent discussions know. Please see the talk page for more info. Thanks, MsBatfish (talk) 08:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Yubikey deletion record
--Qwerty0 (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just came upon the deletion notice at Yubikey, and I'm trying to find the entry at AfD? It said you were the closing admin back in '09. I'm curious whether the situation has changed or if it's the same as when the decision took place. --Qwerty0 (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * At 13:54, 17 May 2009 I moved page Yubikey to YubiKey. At 13:54, 17 May 2009 I deleted YubiKey by speedy delete (not AfD) as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see! So it was just pretty spammy? If I find that there are enough references for it to be notable and put together a neutral article (big if), should I just re-create it or is there more to the procedure? Haven't ever re-created an article before.

Thank you for prompt assistance!
The dust had barely settled on my screw-up, doing a cut-and-paste to change the title of Shark Island (Extermination camp) to Shark Island Extermination Camp, when the history was merged back again. Thank you for your help, and -- again -- I apologize for my mistake! Best wishes, Virago250 (talk) 07:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you at Shishapangma
Thanks for your assistanceRacerx11 (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Anthony - Thanks --Mike Cline (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Find it ironic after six weeks or more of discussions about the spelling of this mountain that in my haste, I have misspelled the name in this section heading...now of all times when it would appear it has finally been settled. Corrected spelling in my previous post.--Racerx11 (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Personhood
Thank you for the move! USchick (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Little Mix

 * If you have a chance, please look at the move request at Talk:Little Mix. One minute after the request was posted, someone else did a cut & paste move of Little Mix to Little Mix, at 22:17 today. I didn't revert because of a flurry of edits at the new (correct) title immediately after the move.  I think all that is needed now is a simple histmerge of Little Mix into Little Mix.  If you agree, perhaps you could do that and close the request or just delete the whole page. Thanks. Station1 (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ histmerge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Your assistance for Mohnish Bahl is appreciated. Centaur81 (talk) 07:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Please advise (info about living persons)

 * I need advice on this... This is regarding Biography articles of living persons: I think you will appreciate that getting reliable citations for information on living persons through books, journals, print media or even the Internet may not always be possible. Is it possible for an editor to cite the person's family members/relatives in this case, if they provide information? After all, such information would be most reliable as it would have come, if you will, from the horse's mouth... Kindly advise. Centaur81 (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Best see WikiProject Biography. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Livorno now moved to Leghorn (city) without discussion

 * There was an old talk page discussion which was completely split. Could you very kindly reverse? All the best for Christmas & New Year! My Christmas card is Adoration of the Shepherds (Le Nain) Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Already ✅ by someone. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks - forgot to note that. Johnbod (talk) 23:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
Thanks for the histmerge. Wish there was a bit that would allow me to do that without having to become an admin. :-) Yworo (talk) 23:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Eastman Kodak
Greatly appreciate your intervention in reverting that anon user that never does anything constructive except trolling users for any perceived infringement.MonkeyKingBar (talk) 23:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

European Le Mans Series to 2001 European Le Mans Series season

 * Hello. Why was the merge and rename rejected? After a monthe of discussion at the Sports Car Racing Project, everybody agreed with the change. The Le Mans Series championship will be renamed European Le Mans Series for 2012, so we want to rename that article to European Le Mans Series. So to do the change, we have to do something with the history of the old European Le Mans Series article. Please, will you merge European Le Mans Series to 2001 European Le Mans Series season? --NaBUru38 (talk) 18:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As the recent edit comments in page 2001 European Le Mans Series season's history show, this histmerge request was rejected because of WP:Parallel histories. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Yarlung Tsangpo
Hello!

Could you have a look at Mike's talk page, chapter Yarlung Tsangpo, as the discussion is mentioning a move that you have made back in 2009. Thanks,--Pseudois (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comments on Representation
Hi there! My name is Whenaxis, I noticed that you are on the Mediation Committee. I created a policy proposal called Representation. I think that this policy would help the Mediation Committee as well as the Arbitration Committee because the goal of this proposed policy is to decrease the amount of time wasted when an unfamiliar editor files a Mediation or Arbitration Committee when other forms of Dispute Resolution have not yet been sought. For example, an editor may come to the Mediation Committee requesting formal mediation when other dispute resolution areas have not been utilised such as third opinions or request for comments. A representative works much like a legal aid - there to help you for free and:


 * File a formal mediation case or an arbitration case on your behalf
 * Make statements and submit evidence at the case page on your behalf
 * Guide you through the expansive and sometimes complex policies and procedures of Wikipedia

This proposed idea can also help the editor seeking help because it can alleviate the stress and anxiety from dispute resolution because mediation and arbitration can be intimidating for those who are unfamiliar.

I would highly appreciate your comments on this proposal at: Wikipedia talk:Representation. Cheers and Happy New Year -  Whenaxis  about talk contribs 22:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)