User talk:Anthony Mclarenx

Welcome!
Hello, Anthony Mclarenx, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Diazie News, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schminnte &#91;talk to me&#93; 16:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Diazie News


A tag has been placed on Draft:Diazie News, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Schminnte &#91;talk to me&#93; 16:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Contested deletion (copied from Draft talk:Diazie News)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It is being used to inform the public about the company to prevent misinformation and misunderstandings, also it is on wikipedia so it is easily accesible by people who tend to learn something about Diazie News as the company is still new and when someone searches information about it, it usually does not show) --Anthony Mclarenx (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. I have gone ahead and deleted Draft:Diazie News as it was unambiguously promotional.  However, I wanted to respond to your statement contesting the deletion.
 * You say it is not unambiguousy promotional because "it is beling used to inform the public about the company", however when ever a company engages in advertising or public relations, those activities are being used to inform the public about what the company wants it to know.
 * You say it is on Wikpedia and is easily accessible to the public. This is true, and is one reason why we do not like our free, non-profit encyclopedia project being used by people with a for-profit motive as a source of free advertising.
 * You say that "the company is still new and when someone searches information about it, it usually does not show." This is getting to the heart of what we call notability.  Basically, because we are an encyclopedia, we are a tertiary source, meaning all the information we present needs to come from somewhere else.  If there is no information out there about a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about that topic.
 * Basically, in your attempt to argume against your draft being speedily deleted as unambiguous promotion; you have done nothing but indicate that it is, indeed, unambiguous promotion that needs to be deleted.
 * I assume you work for Diazie News. If so, that makes you a "paid editor".  Please carefully read WP:PAID and make the mandatory disclosures if you intend to continue editing on their behalf. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 17:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)