User talk:Anthony Weater

Notability of Robert lee willie
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Robert lee willie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Robert lee willie seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Robert lee willie, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Robert Lee Willie
Hi Anthony, why did you blank this page? I hope it wasn't because an over-zealous editor had tagged it for deletion without thinking. It is obviously a notable subject for an encyclopedia article. Before you blanked it I removed the deletion request, and tidied it up a bit to conform with standard Wikipedia style.

Please don't let this experience put you off creating or editing other articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to AFC Ajax has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to AFC Ajax constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 20:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lomana LuaLua. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alexfusco5 20:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kazenga LuaLua. Alexfusco5 20:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text  below.  Snowolf How can I help? 20:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Please can I get unblocked as I was only adding my personal opinions to the articles. I am really sorry. Sorry snowolf and alex fusco. Snowolf you do a truely excellent job not to mention a brilliant job.

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely from editing, as you've once again made disruptive edits by blanking pages. Friday (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)