User talk:Anthony morgan peters

ALWAYS FORGIVE & TEACH THE NOOB,

Hello there, First off I am still learning wikiepidia. So If you are here because I did something wrong just tell me what I did and why it was wrong. By the way I will report you if you put in a vandal message. Oh and please watch your language please do not use profanity in your message thankyou ,

Socialcasting
Got your note on the socialcasting page. I am happy to help make it a wikified discussion page.Allthingstoallpeople (talk) 21:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

North American Union ≠ North American Republic
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your good faith additions to the North American Union article. This article covers the merger of the United States, Canada, and Mexico that was proposed in scholarly circles and is the subject of many conspiracy theories. The NAU concept does not appear to be related to either the North American Republic secessionist movement or the projected dissolution of the USA. However if you can directly source and cite the NAR to the NAU via reliable, third-party, published sources then please feel free to re-add it to the article (though preferably without all the spelling and grammar mistakes ). Please let me know if you have any questions or issues. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Ceciley Jenkins
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ceciley Jenkins, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://cecileyjenkins.com/bio.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

=Copyright problems with Ceciley Jenkins== Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ceciley Jenkins, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cecileyjenkins.com/bio.php. As a copyright violation, Ceciley Jenkins appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ceciley Jenkins has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ceciley Jenkins and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Ceciley Jenkins with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ceciley Jenkins.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Less text which is copied is still text which is copied. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Antiedman, you may be blocked from editing. Graham 87 01:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Graham 87 06:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC) .

GA nominee
Hai, I have nominated the film article Loham for GA-status. Which is currently on "Hold on" time and there are some corrections to be done before it ends. Mainly copy editing for grammer and writting style. So kindly help me to make it a good article by contributing to the suggestions referred in Talk:Loham. Charles Turing (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)