User talk:Anthonygalluccischolar

May 2020
Hello, I'm Khruner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Prehistoric Egypt seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khruner (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 15:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I blocked you because you seem to be here to pursue an agenda promoting your views of Kemetism and your publication(s). Interestingly these seem similar to those of Yosef Ben-Jochannan who also writes about the so-called "Ta-Merrians" and you use as a source. I presume the book you added written by someone with your name is yours: "Ancient Kemetic Path: Resurrecting the Ancestors to Empower the Descendants. Colorado: Overstanding Publishing & Production; Kemetic Holistics." There doesn't seem to be any such publisher, and Amazon.in says it's independently published. Actually Amazon.com does mention that "publisher" but it still seems self-published and certainly does not meet our criteria at WP:RS. As you say, Wikipedia is not meant to be a source of propaganda, it's a main-stream encyclopedia.  Doug Weller  talk 17:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

RIP George Floyd 2020!!!!

I understand your concerns. If you had reached out to me I would have gladly adjusted the couple of concerns you mentioned. What is the Kemetic agenda? What reason do you have to dismiss Dr. Ben and the usage of the term Kemet in reference to ancient so-called Egyptian people? Do you have verifiable sources or scholastic credibility to dispute the findings of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dr. Ben (Cornell University Africana Center) or myself. Can you please define "mainstream"? Most pertinently, what would you require of me to be able to gain back my introductory and basic level of participation with Wikipedia as you blocking my account indefinitely seems to be a bit of an overstep in regard to the error I had committed in placing my work in citing the published version of my Master's Thesis in Religious Studies. In short, what do you require of me to be able to unblock my account and my IP address? Thank you for your time, scholarship and humility; it is truly one of the most important commodities.

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

"An indefinite block is a block that does not have a definite (or fixed) duration. Indefinite blocks are usually applied when there is significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy. In such cases an open-ended block may be appropriate to prevent further problems until the matter can be resolved by discussion. As with all blocks, it is not a punishment. It is designed to prevent further disruption, and the desired outcome is a commitment to observe Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and to stop problematic conduct in future." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks)