User talk:Anthonyhcole/OED Scholarship

I don't know what you and other "scholars" problems might be mentally, but the naivety to deny pain's involvement in maintaining the physical body in it's most pristine form as long as possible, to ensure survival of the single objecive ogrnanism so that it may CONTINUE TO PROCREATE WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF IT'S SPECIES, is the same egotism that wrought the middle ages with bogus facts and mythologies, well after the likes Iamblichus and Archytas knew that the world revolved around the universe, not the other way around. To put it quite bluntly, information won't get out there for people to explore, research, and comprehend IF YOU SUPPRESS IT! I will state this for the last time, as I'm giving up on wikipedia and it's cult pathologists who disseminate every concept of imagination. It is not a stretch to believe that as a result of living, life becomes more and more complex. As life becomes more complex, so do that habituations as well. Including procreation. If procreation is the survivability of the species, and the species looks for the most viable partners to mate with, then pain plays a very significant role in keeping a healthy being able to procreate. So, with that said, I hope you and your jokers can get past your own intellect and excersie a little spark of imagination. I doubt Coppernicus would have shunned new information....


 * The definition of "scholarship" was here to support an argument I was putting at talk:pseudo-scholarship. I think I agree with every word you have said. What is your problem with what I say? Anthony (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)