User talk:Anti-Cleric

Speedy deletion of "Fall Of Pangea"
A tag has been placed on "Fall Of Pangea", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Passargea 23:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Viking Trilogy
A tag has been placed on Viking Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MorrisRob 08:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 00:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Beatles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 02:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The Beatles were pop before they were anything else. What do you think "I Want to Hold Your Hand" is? And please look at the talk page. The issue of genre was discussed with the consensus that they had so many genres that only the most generic would be included: pop and rock. Please try to respect other opinions and not assume ownership of articles. Ward3001 (talk) 02:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)