User talk:Anticorbyn

Welcome!
Hello, Anticorbyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 86.20.193.222. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 05:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 05:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi,

Re. "The private media here is vastly owned by anti-death penalty rupert murdoch. The BBC are run by remainer lefties." 

That's fine; we don't care.

Wikipedia articles only have information from reliable sources.

If the information you "know" is not in reliable sources, we can't add it to Wikipedia.

This is not a news website; it's an encyclopaedia. Articles discuss things that have been published elsewhere - in newspapers, books, magazines, etc. We do not publish original research.

Wikipedia is not a soapbox.

86.20.193.222 (talk) 06:28, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

It would be easier and more polite to explain, it has taken what 4 hours to give some reason. Even the ip address is no reply. It would be better if you had a proper policy to send, than cryptic WPXYZ. As often I look, and that's not all what the policy says. Some of those had 3rd party external references, such as the Galloway Death-Penalty Debate on youtube. Ditto electoral commission on Death-Penalty. Not sure how a party announcing a candidate is original research. We're the registered party, it's our candidate. It isn't contentious at all - as papers are not yet available from the returning officer. Only contentious issues need to be referenced and disputed. The libdems used twitter and fake refs to their own website - you need to be consistent for all. You can always refer to party website / wiki page.
 * Sorry, YouTube is not considered a reliable source. Neither are wiki pages.


 * As for a party's own website, that would be a primary source, which is of limited use; see WP:PSTS 86.20.193.222 (talk) 06:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Have you removed the LibDem references that refer to its own media? twitter? can't see you have.
 * The only use of twitter is to state that the parties announced their candidates on it; that's an acceptable use of a primary source; see WP:TWITTER. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Please restore my account, you have behaved worse than me, using an IP address.

"The only use of twitter is to state that the parties announced their candidates" That's what I did, and it was deleted. English Independence have deed-poll candidate HANG Murderers (Surname Firstname), with party description 'Death-Penalty for Murder'. George Galloway (reference you deleted - has youtube citing 'EU prevents Death-Penalty' (not after Brexit - ha ha) Also fielded ANTI Corbyn in Batley & Spen, coming 5th out of 10 - ahead of heavily media promoted LibertyGB.

March 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Philg88 ♦talk 08:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of English Independence Party


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that English Independence Party, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)