User talk:Antidiskriminator/Archive 12

Please comment on Talk:Bijeljina massacre
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bijeljina massacre. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Šime Budinić
Quick question - in the lead, are you trying to say he translated different catechetical texts, or that he was a catechist himself? Thank you!  Pax  Verbum  20:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I wanted to say that he translated different catechetical texts.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Šime Budinić
Added to my watchlist, I'll get to it in a day or two... GregorB (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Did a bit yesterday, will continue... GregorB (talk) 06:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Šime Budinić at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

Please comment on Talk:Luis Vernet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Luis Vernet. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Šime Budinić
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 12, May-June 2015 by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
 * Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
 * Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
 * American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Please comment on Talk:Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1982 Lebanon War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1982 Lebanon War. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Croats (military unit)
Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ragnvald Knaphövde
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ragnvald Knaphövde. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AL-SR
Template:AL-SR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Closure review
I have opened a closure review at ANI. Please comment there. Thank you, --ceradon ( talk •  edits ) 21:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseon
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseon. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for South Slavic Bible Institute
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

OSAMDEVETTRI
Antidiskriminator, I know you're a big fan of the old boom-bap. Can you help this poor article out? And does La Familia get to article status? Drmies (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you forget my ban from topics which include this article?  --Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Wait--I suppose I did. Boom bap is banned too? Hold on. Drmies (talk) 17:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. What if I were to propose that the topic ban be sharpened up to say "political and historical topics"? Would you care for that or are you only interested in those areas? It might be a way back in to prove something to some of your critics. I don't mind, and I don't see why they would either. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * To what end ? As long as decision about my ban is made based only or predominantly on personal opinion of small group of involved editors, I think that both of us know what will inevitably happen as soon as I apply complete ban. The scope of the ban does not resolve the real issue here. Nevertheless, thank you for your proposal. I respected the ban for more than a year during which nobody complained I repeated the same behavior. That was enough for uninvolved editors who participated in the discussion and all !voted for unban. That is what only matters in ban appeals posted more than a year after ban was imposed. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, if you spread your wings a bit, if you are allowed to, you might make some more friends and, who knows, might convince some of your former opponents. I don't know, it might not work, but you could try, even if you don't care for hip hop. But it's up to you, AD; like I said, I'll be glad to try and propose this. Drmies (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That is wrong way to resolve lack of uninvolved input issue. That is not how wikipedia works. It is not battlefield. It is not me and my friends against my opponents . The purpose of noticeboards is to get uninvolved and neutral additional opinions. Not POV railroading. Consensus among a limited group of involved editors based on their personal opinion about one editor ≠ community consensus. If decision about my ban/unban can be predominantly based on personal opinion of editors who banned me I don't want to be unbanned. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It is a way, a very pragmatic way. As you've seen, it's often a matter of who shows up. The way to get more people to show up is to get more people to show up; uninvolved editors who don't know you from Adam have little reason to read up and participate. It's not "the community" that shows up--it's those who are involved, those who know the involved parties. Self-flagellation may feel like an honorable way to show that our community isn't working properly, but we kind of knew that already. Drmies (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't agree that "our community isn't working properly". Every administrator who wants to close the discussion about my ban has to read up the discussion and to evaluate presented arguments grounded in wikipedia policies. Not personal opinion about my behavior that lack evidence, especially not those of involved editors. Did closing admin read up the discussion? No. They showed how carefully they read up the discussion by insisting that I should present a plan how will I avoid edit warring. Should I say that "our community isn't working properly" and peform self-flagellation because of that? No. What was the evidence presented when you told one editor to zip up and present an argument? Link to three years old discussion. I am sure that you know what No personal attacks policy says about "accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki." Did you sanction them for peronal attack on their opponent? No. Are speculations about my ethnicity an argument? No. Did they do it? Yes. Did they speculate if I am stupid, dubm and merely sentient being? Yes. Did you sanction them? No. Was it necessary for them to quote their speculations about my ethnicity after you warned them? No. Did you sanction them? No. It is me who you sanctioned for takpage behavior. And you expect me to perform self-flagellation? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You're absolutely correct; good luck. Drmies (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Stub contest
For the contest, a stub should be less than:


 * 150 words "readable prose size" (or 4 sentences), if it has references;
 * 300 words "readable prose size" (or 8 sentences), if it has no references.

(RPS counts words in text but not lists, footnotes, etc. This script can help count it.)

Hope this helps, and thanks for your entries! Andrew Gray (talk) 21:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply .--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malkoč-beg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Una River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Egg cream
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Egg cream. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Potential admin
Hi, I notice you're on List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  01:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Lordship of Berat
Since you are an expert on the subject, I feel that this edit [] is a bit problematic. How can a non-existent (in 1444) Lordship participate as part of the L. of Lezhe?14:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello . All the sources I have seen confirm that Berat was taken by the Ottomans in 1417 and kept it for centuries without interruption. That is why I wrote this comment (diff). Thanks for your input.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruđina Balšić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valona. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:


 * , who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy.  A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
 * , second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
 * , first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany.  Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
 * , second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
 * , from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
 * , from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
 * , from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
 * , also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

, and  11:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murder of Anni Dewani
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Murder of Anni Dewani. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Palestine
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Palestine. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ruđina Balšić
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:European colonization of the Americas
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:European colonization of the Americas. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Connally
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Connally. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trưng Sisters
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trưng Sisters. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 13
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 13, August-September 2015 by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
 * Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
 * Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
 * Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skanderbeg's rebellion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ohrid Archbishopric and Battle of Niš. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Establishments
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Establishments. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kansas River
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kansas River. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Serbian Caesars?
Hello Antidiskriminator,

do you have any idea from which sources the following allegations might be derived?


 * Fine, Late Medieval Balkans, p. 357: "On Lake Ohrid a Serb named Mladen, granted the title caesar by Dušan".
 * Melanges Georges Ostrogorsky. Naučno delo. 1991. p. 127: "... кесара BojnxHy, Радохну и Вука БранковиЬа" (cited in Nikola Radonja).

I don't find any confirmation of Mladen, Radonja and Vuk as caesars in [http://de.scribd.com/doc/230321307/%D0%91-%D0%BE-%D0%B6-%D0%B8-%D0%B4-%D0%B0-%D1%80-%D0%A4-%D0%B5-%D1%80-%D1%98-%D0%B0-%D0%BD-%D1%87-%D0%B8-%D1%9B-%D0%A1-%D0%B5-%D0%B2-%D0%B0-%D1%81-%D1%82-%D0%BE-%D0%BA-%D1%80-%D0%B0-%D1%82-%D0%BE-%D1%80-%D0%B8-%D0%B8-%D0%BA-%D0%B5-%D1%81-%D0%B0-%D1%80-%D0%B8-%D1%83-%D0%A1-%D1%80-%D0%BF-%D1%81-%D0%BA#scribd Божидар Ферјанчић: Севастократори и кесари у Српском царству. In: Зборник Филозофског факултета X-1, 1970, S. 255–269].

Thank you for clarification! Jürgen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.83.20.148 (talk) 22:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015: The results
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is. All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. , a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to. Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:


 * wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
 * wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
 * wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
 * wins the prize for fourth place
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
 * wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
 * wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

, and  18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sofia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sofia. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greco-Italian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greco-Italian War. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iranian peoples
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iranian peoples. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Riđani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ragusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Odinism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Odinism. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:German evacuation from East-Central Europe near the end of World War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:German evacuation from East-Central Europe near the end of World War II. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Old Serbian printing houses
Very good work creating the articles on Old Serbian printing houses. I would suggest that you create Old Serbian printing houses, listing the printing houses and their notable works, as well as noting their connection to eachother, and legacy. This article would be linked from several articles and templates. Thank you!--Z oupan 09:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks . The subject is very important and complex while my initial knowledge about it was modest when I first started to write about it. Therefore I had a plan to:
 * learn about the subject trough creating of individual related articles and a template with links to them
 * create one summary article, i.e. Early Serbian language printing.
 * I more or less completed first step and created many individual articles and one simple template (Template:Printed srbulje) and prepared a draft of a more complex template (link). Then I realised that early Serbian language printing also includes protestant religious books and related printing houses (i.e. one established within South Slavic Bible Institute) so I created another draft below (see above link). I did not advance much further because it is very complex subject and I did not have much of a free time lately to edit wikipedia. Any help is of course appreciated.
 * One remark: I think that a title such as Early Serbian language printing would be more appropriate, because it is the language which is necessarily Serbian, not the house, country or the printer.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There is one problem though, the problematics of Serbian language. Protestant and Catholic-based works would be considered non-Serbian, and rather, Serbo-Croatian. An article name such as Old Serbian printing houses would include the printing houses which are regarded part of the Serbian literary corpus, and not strictly language (of which there are differing modern views of). For instance, in English-language sources, Narodna biblioteka Srbije: The monastery was the source of the idea of establishing Serbian printing houses, Ivić, The history of Serbian culture: At the same time, another important branch of Serbian printing was founded, Lunt & Weintraub: Conditions in the Serbian lands were extremely difficult, and in the next century most of their printing was done in Venice, etc. they point to a national-cultural definition rather than linguistical. --Z oupan 11:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks . There are different modern views not only regarding linguistic but also (maybe even more) regarding the "national-cultural definition". I think it is probably easier to find reliable sources for language than for the "national-cultural definition", especially in the period in question. The title will crystallize itself with development of the article. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 14
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 14, October-November 2015 by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
 * Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
 * Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Please comment on Talk:Edward VIII
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edward VIII. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Mataruge
The comment was on the material, not on you. You are the one who makes personal attacks "until somebody stops you". So, I have all the right to discuss about the content in the respective talk page. Btw, I did not change or tag anything inside your article. But unless you explicitly want to get involved into discussions of these kind, keep editing the article and make it neutral. I will endorse you for that. --Mondiad (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Firearms policy in the United Kingdom
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Firearms policy in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)