User talk:Antidiskriminator/Archive 9

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=594732635 your edit] to Third League of Prizren may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * page=572|quote=Тахир Заими (касније у емиграцији председник Треће призренске лиге),[ Tahir Zaimi later in emigration president of the Third League of Prizren]}}
 * Vojske|page=369|quote=Призренска лига и Национални комитет „Слободно Косово" од 1978. године щелу е на заједничкој платформи...[Xhafer Deva established in New York the Third League of Prizren in

Please comment on Talk:British Isles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:British Isles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Historiography of Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scutari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

False Accusation
Actually, my attention was brought to the Skenderaj talk page after I got a notification that BrownHairedGirl had mentioned me in her comment/ closure. Please rescind/ withdraw this false accusation or I'll rescind it for you. I'm getting sick to death of your false accusations and constant badgering on my talk page, this constitutes as WP:Harassment and a violation of Wikipedia policy. Consider this to by your final warning. Regards IJA (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Johann Erich Thunmann
The DYK project (nominate) 15:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello Antidiscriminator, Thank you very much for your kind words and advice. As you can see; I am new to Wikipedia. After I added several battles and leaders from different factions to the Template talk:Yugoslav Front. I noticed all of that hours of editing I invested into that Template had vanished and reverted back to the original state. I thought for sure that my work was lost forever and that I had to restart all over again. Again he deleted my work. Complaining "This is not a redfarm link" Once again User:Peacemaker67 reverted the template back to the previous state. I agreed with him about the redfarm links. Instead I edited the template into one of these versions as you have noticed. diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4
 * Now about the edit war dispute between myself and User:Peacemaker67....
 * Later on I decided the damage could be revived from the Edit History. I reverted the damage User:Peacemaker67 has committed and added few more details to the template.
 * I felt the Template was not complete. All of the battles that took place in occupied Yugoslavia needed to be added there.

THERE WERE NO REDFARM LINKS! What was the reason behind that action?? From then on he would undo whatever edit action I performed on that template and I would undo his inappropriate action, thus sparking the edit war. It lasted for several minutes until he send a message that he will be reporting me....like the disgusting coward he truly is.. So much for a former UN personnel serving in war-torn Yugoslavia. Now living in the present, he has an obsession for that region. Hours later after creating a new article. The user administrator that blocked me fron Wikipedia User:Joy undid one of my edits to the Template:Norwegian Campaign It seems that User:Joy is a henchmen for User:Peacemaker67 If you can tell me how to report User:Peacemaker67 for his unnecessary actions in retaliation, I would most appreciate it. I wish to present evidence of his actions by sending you links from the Edit History from the Template talk:Yugoslav Front. I currently don't have the knowledge on how to perform this step. That's right! She is a Croat... Which proves she is a Ustašhe fanatic! Is it possible to hide all of my activity so no one, not even the high-ranking wikipedians who call themselves "administrator" can see none of my activity - much less follow me around and revert the edits and later misuse the reporting option? When and why was the two articles I created deleted? Two of these articles had sources. The sources to Battle of Zavlaka is non-existent on the known internet. There is no need for "sources". This was a battle, not a skirmish. Chetiks fought and died to liberate the village form the Germans. User:The Banner seems to be another henchmen(talk) 11:32, 8 February, 2014 (UTC)
 * Later on the template was AGAIN reverted back to the original state....by you guessed it User:Peacemaker67
 * Also why and how did the User:Joy follow me to the Template:Norwegian Campaign? This only proves my point that she is behaving like a henchmen.
 * Battle of Zavlaka (1941)
 * Action of 10 April 1940
 * Action of 16 November 1943
 * The message above was originally posted in one of your talk page archives. Mathonius (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC) (Feel free to remove this note)
 * Mr. User:BjeliRabac, let me put it politely: if you go on like this with your personal attacks, your unsourced edits and your POV-pushing you can find yourself quite quickly on the wrong side of a topic ban request. The Banner talk 20:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Centralia, Pennsylvania
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Centralia, Pennsylvania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensus to endorse
I agree that the discussion was far from ideal, especially given that, as you point out ,and as I comment on in my close, all comments were by editors involved in the original RM. That said I can't see any useful purpose being served by keeping the discussion open given that there had been no comments in so long. I stand by the consensus I found although I admit it is a very weak consensus. Dpmuk (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The MRV had been open for 4 weeks and had had no additional comments in almost as long. I believe the effect that other discussions had on this would have been at best minimal.  I also don't like the precedent that keeping the discussion open longer would set.  At the end of the day editors had plenty of time to comment and they chose not to, for whatever reason.  It's starting to look like you just won't accept the decision and are looking for any possible way that you may be able to change it.  I would strongly advise against it but if you wish to ask for review of my close then WP:AN is the place to do so.  I will not be undoing my own close due to any argument based on lack of participation. Dpmuk (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Puerto Rico
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Puerto Rico. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:


 * , a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
 * , a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
 * , another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:


 * , who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
 * , who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
 * , who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 4
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014 News for February from your Wikipedia Library. Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanjak of Nicopolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations

 * Thank you very much!--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

== Please comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please move and redirect

 * Go ahead, I do not mind if you redirect it to Persecution of Ottoman Muslim. Thank you for helping. Star Lord -  星王 (talk) 10:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Persecution of Ottoman Muslims page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598171159 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F598171159%7CPersecution of Ottoman Muslims%5D%5D Ask for help])

Posts
Do not edit my posts to misleadingly make it appear they are in response to you rather another specific user as you have done here. -- ◅ PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 10:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I apologize. Now after I read WP:INDENTATIONS I see that you are right. I wish your comment was not so unnecessary harsh.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Paulina Lebl-Albala
Hi. Can you assist with this one, Paulina Lebl-Albala? I really appreciate it. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I will try as soon as I will have some time.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for this delicious sweet!--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Skaramuca
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skaramuca. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

WP History in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject History for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Economy of Serbia
Hi Antidiskriminator. If you have time, I'd really appreciate you reviewing the additional article content that I've proposed on the Economy of Serbia talk page. If you aren't already aware the Government of Serbia is a client of mine and I've registered my COI on the noticeboard. Any questions then let me know. Thanks Vivj2012 (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Paulina Lebl-Albala
Thanks and have a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
--Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sanjak of Nicopolis
Best wishes Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Soviet Union
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Soviet Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: Leftist errors
I find it a very interesting topic, even if history is not exactly my cup of tea. I'm not really a copyeditor either - except for minor tweaks - but why not, I'm going to take a look (within a day or two). I'll leave some remarks in the talk page too. The article on my watchlist now. GregorB (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bajo Stanišić
Cheers and thanks, hope you are having a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter
A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. , who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:300: Rise of an Empire
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:300: Rise of an Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=602973697 your edit] to Uprising in Montenegro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * publisher=Institut pour l'étude du mouvement ouvrier|page=21|quote=Italian forces: Six divisions Puglie, Tarro, Mesina, Pusteria, Venezia, Cacciatori delle Alpi" — 2 (two) battalions of border

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Please comment on Talk:2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Pljevlja
slakr \ talk / 09:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Assembly of Delvino
Hi there. I've just created this article. From the correspodent bibliography I've can concluded that there was some connection between Peasant Revolt in Albania and Essad Pasha in July-September 1914.Alexikoua (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * . Hi. Thanks for notifying me about this article. You did a very good job with it. I will have it in mind when editing related articles.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * In case you have time to spare, I've nominated it for DYK.Alexikoua (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Some minor remarks:
 * Some sources emphasize it was Constituent assembly.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ivan Milutinović
Thanks for your article Victuallers (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to all Macedonian users to create an art. on Igor Janev on English Wikipedia
This is an invitation to all Macedonian users to create an art. on Igor Janev (at English Wikipedia), please see Talk Page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=next&oldid=603995897

Furher see sources 



http://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%88%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C

He is professor in Macedonia, member of NYAS, he publ. 160 scholarly art., 17 books in Int. Law, Foreign policy and Diplomacy. He discovered the ULTRA VIRES act of UN in the process of admission of Macedonia in UN (published in AJIL, Vol.93. no 1.)--16:51, 11. april 2014 (CEST)

http://www.mia.mk/en/Inside/RenderSingleNews/289/105947751 or at MINA : http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/21668/45/ or http://www.makemigration.com/iselenistvoweb/index.php?page=iselenici&id=247&tip_iselenici=7

http://s241910817.onlinehome.us/html/articles/janev/janev.html

or http://www.mkd.mk/makedonija/politika/nekoj-go-brishe-igor-janev-od-vikipedija

or his contribution to US recognition of Macedonia under Republic of Macedonia

http://dobarglas.info/naslovna_v6.htm http://www.makedonskosonce.com/broevis/2008/sonce748.pdf/12_15_janev.pdf

Furthermore Macedonian media shocked on attempt to delete Janev from Wikipedia

http://www.time.mk/c/61e6ad16de/janev-postoi-praven-lek-za-imeto.html

http://www.makdenes.org/content/article/1956873.html

http://www.mkd.mk/54357/makedonija/se-ceka-na-potpisot-na-ivanov-rezolucija-janev-on

LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF A PROVISIONAL NAME FOR MACEDONIA IN THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM citation:

See : https://www.google.com/search?q=Igor+Janev&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 http://macedonianhr.org.au/wip/images/stories/pdf/1252648063581.pdf see cit.http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2009/bajalski_borko.pdf

http://sam.gov.tr/on-the-uns-legal-responsibility-for-the-irregular-admission-of-macedonia-to-un/

http://www.sar.org.ro/polsci/?p=264

http://www.makedonskosonce.com/broevis/2008/sonce713.pdf/16_17_janev.pdf

http://www.crpm.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Policy-Brief-NatoMak.pdf

http://denesen.mk/web/2013/08/31/janev-postoi-praven-lek-za-imeto/

ULTRA VIRES act of UN organs is relevant, see http://www.mkd.mk/makedonija/politika/nekoj-go-brishe-igor-janev-od-vikipedija http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/ccTLDs-TM.pdf, When we say US, p. 845, note 28. G. Ivanov, "Recalling that the International Court of Justice 1948 advisory opinion had determined that placing additional criteria on United Nations membership contravened the United Nations Charter", http://gadebate.un.org/67/former-yugoslav-republic-macedonia Thomas D. Grant, Admission to the United Nations, Martinus pub. , pp. 203-212 http://books.google.rs/books?id=5Uuv0NLNdZQC&pg=PA322&lpg=PA322&dq=Igor+Janev+Admission+to+the&source=bl&ots=6DgOwcDxtS&sig=4DlZpp7DCtAOeeMqhjvN0QviEl0&hl=sr&sa=X&ei=GERKU9ivOsXOtQaD9oGIDA&ved=0CFkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Igor%20Janev%20Admission%20to%20the&f=false

Regards to all! -178.222.22.90 (talk) 07:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:False flag
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:False flag. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

hvala
Ja stvarno nemam naviku da delim priznanja za rad, ali tebi ih dugujem već nekoliko :) --Mladifilozof (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Juraj Šporer
The DYK project (nominate) 16:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 5
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 5, March 2014 by ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * New Visiting Scholar positions
 * TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
 * Australian articles get a link to librarians
 * Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Pavle Đurišić
You've already provided your "last comment". Quit beating a dead horse especially on my talkpage. -- ◅ PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 09:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Location map Israel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Location map Israel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Ljiljana Raicevic
Hi. You might be interested in Ljiljana Raicevic. Enjoy your wikibreak! --Rosiestep (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What a remarkable person. Thank you for sharing this with me.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Right Sector
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Right Sector. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Persistent deception
Hi, Why do you repeatedly add factual errors like this to so many articles? You are an experienced editor and you have been repeatedly told about wikipedia's rules; why does this tendentious editing persist? Many editors have tried asking you to edit honestly, but it's been happening for years. What will it take to end this problem? bobrayner (talk) 23:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello? Why do you continue to insert hoaxes and fantasies? Why does this tendentious editing persist? bobrayner (talk) 01:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606740389 your edit] to Sulejman Pačariz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s and  3 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606829460 your edit] to Sandžak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Sandžak|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Pazar was included into Serbia, while Plav and Rožaje were included into Italian ruled Albania {{red|&#41;}}, and under German occupation from 1943. At the end of the war, Sandžak was

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter
Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's, whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included, who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and , who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from, tiger from and The Lion King from. We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to and  for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Contested moves
It doesn't appear that you realize that you can move templates yourself...? See WP:MOR for an explanation. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 20:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The point is that you don't need admin privileges to do such a move. That's how Peacemaker67 did it in these two cases, after all. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:French Revolution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:French Revolution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination). Thanks. MarkBernstein (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jews and Communism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jews and Communism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference
They work if templates Citation and Cite book (with ref= parameter) are used. In which article You noticed this? -- Bojan   Talk  06:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

It works now -- Bojan   Talk  06:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Is now everything fine? -- Bojan   Talk  07:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

My intention was to templatize Harvard citation style, not to change it in another. -- Bojan   Talk  09:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

First and Final Warning
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:June 1941 uprising in eastern Herzegovina. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You should be ashamed of yourself. Your attempted "character assassination by insinuation" and "out-of-context quoting" using a MILHIST assessment I did is reprehensible in the extreme. I will not warn you again. Any further attempt to insinuate that I am anti-Semitic will result in a report to WP:AN with a request for an indefinite site ban. An unreserved apology is in order. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Creation of articles with titles that do not meet WP:TITLE
How many times do I have to remind you, this is ENGLISH Wikipedia, not Serbian or Serbo-Croat WP. It is tendentious to regularly create articles using titles that clearly do not meet WP:TITLE. I'm also sick of the tendentious carping on about how "harsh" I am every time I challenge your POV. German-Partisan negotiations is typical of your behaviour, create a poorly titled article that cherry-picks reliable sources, then when I challenge the title and start using the sources properly, you retreat, claiming I'm being harsh. Keeping a list of all the articles you have decided not to edit anymore because you got challenged about the title, sources or your POV is equally tendentious and your intent in doing so is transparent. I look forward to the day you try to bring all this up in order to have me banned or blocked. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Straw man fallacy. You ignored part of my comment in which I emphasized that "The same title has been used by multiple English language sources. It is easy to Google it. Some sources even emphasize that this German-Partisan negotiations "has subsequently become known as the 'March Negotiations'"."
 * If you want to see tendentious behavior regarding article titles look at the Talk:SS Polizei-Selbstschutz-Regiment Sandschak or Talk:Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia.
 * Don't worry about the long list of articles from which you chased me away. Its purpose is not to report you but to remind myself what articles I should not edit to avoid unnecessarily harsh and unjustified accusations and violations of AGF against me. All the best. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Review request
Hi, I've started a biographical article about a WWI soldier from Serbia (Dragoljub Jeličić), can you review the page if you have time? Thanks in advance. - Anonimski (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi . I don't think I am able to review this article because it has everything a start class article should have. It is very interesting. Thanks.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Regardless of what you may claim, and regardless of whether you believe you are doing so, be advised a case could be made for your conduct representing harassment of other users. You, and to a lesser extent, FkpCascais and Silvio1973, can be shown to exhibit a pattern of stalking and hounding. Please stop now, as its turning out to be less of a bother to post a report on AE than deal with this all the time. -- Director  ( talk ) 09:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Uprising in Montenegro
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:14, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

WWII France articles mess: occupation edition
I'd appreciate if you could share your views: Talk:German_military_administration_in_occupied_France_during_World_War_II Thank you. Cheers, walk <i style="color:green;">victor falk</i><i style="color:green;">talk</i> 17:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Angela Merkel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Angela Merkel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: Đurđevdan uprising
You're wikilawyering yet again - instead of focusing on what matters, you're spending even more time on dissecting my statements and making this communication even worse. Please snap out of this combative mode and realize that this isn't a productive use of either of our times and effort. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 07:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in the RfC/U
Thank you for the interest showed in the RfC/U I recently posted. I am glad that also people likely not supporting my views are going to participate. Still I want to take the occasion to share with you a few thoughts. You are right in writing that such disputes impact on the productivity of the users and also on the actual quality of the article. And I do not consider myself external to the issue, because WP is a human system so we are all responsible. And feel free to certify the basis of this RfC/U, because whatever is the split of responsabilities clearly there is an issue to solve.

What I actually regret are the words Director chose to deal with me. And perhaps I regret them because I never used any source close to any extremist corcle and because they are not only offensive but used to describe a person that does not correspond to that description. Indeed, since my first encounter with Director I have been suspected to be the sockpuppet of formerly banned user. If you have time go into my first edits and see how extremist they were...

Of course you are free to believe that I am not genuine in what I write you, but I want to take the occasion to share with you what are me beliefs and I will do starting with the words used most currently by Director to describe me.


 * 1) Nationalist? I do not believe the actual idea of Nation as built across the XIX and XX century has the same relevance in a globalized World. I believe in federalism, in regions, in communities that control directly their land and that in harmony live with their neighbors. And actually a region is able to preserve their tradition and their culture much more than a centralised state. A lot of bad can be said about Italy, but also that if we never experienced any strong tension (and the Lega Nord it's not) to divisionism is also because a large autonomy is given to regions and to the right to speak a different language. Remember that the borders of today prepare the wars of tomorrow.
 * 2) Fascist? I never voted a party less on the Left than the Democratic Party and I consider the years of the Fascism the darkest years of my country. For God's sake I hold a card of the Italian Communist Party for 8 years (I can prove it) and now I have to tolerate that I am sympathetic with Mussolini. This is too much.
 * 3) Pro-Italian POV pusher? What happened to the Italians in Yugoslavia in the years 1943-1954 was regrettable but was the inevitable cost that Italy had to pay to have started (and lost) a war that made 20 or 30 millions people (it depends how you count) and an even bigger number of displaced. And I do not have a problem with that. I have a problem with a recent trend of Croatian history which describe the departure of 250,000+ people as voluntary. Or that tend to justify (or worse deny) what happened to over 150,000 ethnic Italians that ancestrally inhabited Istria and Dalmatia. But it is true that I disagree with some of modern Croatian historiography, because basically it looks that in any conflict or dispute the Croatians are always the good guys.
 * 4) Irredentist? The Italian Dalmatia was an invention of the Fascism. Istria, or better a part of it was. Those territories were never Italian. At the best they were inhabited by a minority, concentrated in a few villages and towns. But from there to affirm that Marco Polo (or better Marko Polo, using the croatised version of his name) did not born in Venice there is a distance. There is no house of Marco Polo in Venice and never was, but there is a well restored one in Korcula. There are some people in Italy believing that we should also from scrap build the house of Marco Polo. I think this would be regrettable. As regrettable is to change the name of Venetian painters, artists and inventors. Those people were Venetian, not Italian and not Croatian. But the history of Venice is common to modern Italy and Croatia. Both countries should be proud of it. Silvio1973 (talk) 09:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 6
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 6, April-May 2014 by ,

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
 * TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
 * TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
 * New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more

Re: "Another hodgepodge created by trawling Google search results"
I'm going to move this to Talk:Đurđevdan uprising because it's about that primarily. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Đurđevdan uprising
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Đurđevdan uprising. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: My queries about your Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions
You didn't notice the facetious tone of those sentences including those words? Or was this merely another one in a series of your good ideas to badger me here with another false accusation? Do you seriously not see how this is immensely unproductive? --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I have most certainly not been blocked because I did anything to you, therefore your complaints have not been justified. I was consulted about you in an administrative manner, and I responded with comments about you under the talk page heading that reflected exactly that. I was not involved at Talk:Vukovar when or because you said so; my perceived involvement was entirely unrelated to your taunting. Yes, I am indeed continuing to use that word because that's exactly what you're still doing here, just like back then - if you had seriously believed that I was involved, you would have told me so when I asked you to elaborate. I was not being uncivil by using the words "jerk" and "bastard" in those two instances, because they were rhetorical devices, used in context to refer to no specific people, and indeed they were primarily meant in relation to myself. I did not canvass another user any more than I canvassed you to that same discussion - I simply linked both people whose behavior I was discussing with the other administrator because I thought it would be polite to notify them that way. I honestly don't know where that user is from, but I remember him saying once he was from Australia. If they now edit from another time zone - I wouldn't know, and more to the point, I wouldn't care - the fact that we're unrelated stands. You have, for the umpteenth time now, constructed a story in which you are a victim and I am the bad guy, solely through the use of wikilawyering. We can continue to have these ridiculous point-by-point exchanges, but at some point, someone somewhere is going to pull out a large trout and start slapping us both with it, because this is just inane. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * In what way does our pre-existing discussion about user conduct issues relate to the edit warring at Vukovar, when you didn't take part that edit war over there? What possible administrative actions of mine regarding the edit war at Vukovar could have impacted you in any way?


 * BTW, regarding the 'argument from ignorance' claim - that was another piece of wikilawyering I accidentally didn't respond to... this simply wasn't a claim of "oh hey this is all one big unknown, therefore let's tear it all apart". I know that this event isn't commonly or widely known under that title you used. I know that the very real effects of Ustaše terror are by and large distinctly more notable to the story of WWII in Yugoslavia than purported peasant uprisings. I know that I never saw anything like that in history books. What the RfC is meant to do is involve other, previously uninvolved users, who may then tell us independently if some of those judgement calls about the title and scope of the article have been based on proper sources and argumentation, or not. (Since you obviously have a habit of refusing to listen to Peacemaker67 or myself, and since I'm not in the habit of abusing any of my oh so grand administrative powers to make you go away, the only recourse is to try to get someone else to look at it, to form a relevant sample of consensus.) --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * As I already explained at your talkpage, I think I gave fairly clear explanation about my position regarding your Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and I don't have anything to add to it now. You are, of course, free to disagree with my position, but you should not expect me to be somehow obliged to continue discussing with you at our talkpages as long as you are dissatisfied with it. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle for Novi Pazar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raška (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Last warning
I am sick to death of being wikihounded by you. Since 1 May, you have posted on my talkpage 24 times, ten times since the beginning of June. On one day alone, you posted on my talk page six times, about four separate "issues". In that time, you have also posted 57 times on the talk page of the first article I developed to FA, and also posted a large number of times on other pages I have developed to good article status or higher. I am formally advising you that if you do not stop posting on my talk page, I will be reporting your harassment at ANI. You are not welcome to post on my talkpage except where WP policy requires you to advise me of a report, effective immediately. Please stop. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lim-Sandžak Chetnik Detachment


The article Lim-Sandžak Chetnik Detachment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The title does not exist in English per this, this unit doesn't meet WP:GNG "Significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources independent of the subject", and only receives passing mention in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz@undefinedgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)