User talk:Antifascist

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   02:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Rory 0 96 02:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Wendy Campbell
Yo, AF, what's going on with this article? I changed that paragraph for reasons I explained on the Talk page, and then you essentially reverted the old version (complete with two misspellings, for what it's worth) without making any comments on the Talk page. May I be bold and ask why, and then invite you to discuss the issue on the Talk page?--Deville (Talk) 16:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Gilad Atzmon
Take a look at the report I have just posted at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents --RolandR 18:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the blocking policy. Tom Harrison Talk 13:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING I have posted about Gilad Atzmon is true and easily documented: he IS -in his own words anti-Jewish, he HAS Threatened Sue Blackwell with libel, he clearly refuses to condemn synagogue bombings, he reguarly DOES target Judaism and Jews in his writing for ridicule and contempt, he IS closely allied to nazis and holocaust deniers such as Israel Shamir and Paul Eisen, and many more things I could have added. It is neccessary to know such things in order for a reader to obtain a truly non-POV balanced assesment of a man who whatever his musical talents is clearly a deeply racist anti-Jewish crusader. This information is simply factual; and attempts to remove this constitute censorship. Felix-felix has consistently sought to remove virtually any material about Atzmon that could prove in the least bit unflattering.

Carlos Latuff
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Liftarn 16:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * While I am politically in agreement with you, adding such blatantly POV material to an article is still against Wikipedia policy. If you can source it, and phrase it in a neutral way, it can go back in. --Moralis (talk) 01:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Moralis, I appreciate that unlike Liftarn, you are not a biased pro-Latuff lackie who shares his apologetic attitude towards anti-Jewish racists. However, I should clarify that from the statements of the Iranian regime on the Nazi holocaust for the entire year preceding the cartoon contest, it is by now widely accepted by all mainstream observers that the motivation for that contest was straightforward holocaust denial, which is all my edits said. This is so widely understood that it does not need to be "sourced". As far as Latuff goes, I will leave it up to the reader to determine what it means that he so eagerly participated in such a contest. Antifascist

Counterpunch
Please stop. If you continue to use inappropiate or abusive edit summaries, you will be blocked for disruption.

Your edit summary at contains an uncalled for, grossly defamatory and probably libellous attack on another editor. Please refrain from such abuse. RolandR 10:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Deir Yassin massacre
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Bsherr 04:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Misleading Edit Summaries
Please stop using misleading and abusive edit summaries which claim that the removal of libelous material which violates Wikipedia's BLP policy is "vandalism." Please also assume good faith, and cease accusing users acting correctly according to Wikipedia policy of "whitewashing Nazi racism." Algabal (talk) 10:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Antifascist, your continuing edits on the Daniel McGowan page are in violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons and policy on neutrality. Please refrain from continuing to insult me in your edit summaries, and assume good faith in your dealings with all Wikipedia users. Algabal (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Daniel A. McGowan
Since December of last year you have repeatedly added material to Daniel A. McGowan that is in violation of the biographies of living persons policy. The problematic material has been controversial in nature yet unsupported by the source provided. You have been warned regarded edits to this article previously. This is your final warning. If you continue to add poorly-sourced potentially defamatory material to this biographical article then I will prohibit you from editing Daniel A. McGowan and related articles. CIreland (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate edit summaries
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Making inappropriate comments about other editors in edit summaries may be construed as a violation of wikiipedia's policies against personal attacks. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Cooperative Editing on Gilad Atzmon
Please discuss your edits at the talk page -under the same section heading as above. I will be noting the problems with them before reverting them again, as part of restructuring into separate Politics and Allegations of antisemitism sections. Failure to discuss while hurling insults at other editors and subjects of articles against WP:BLP is against a number of wikipedia policies. Carol Moore 16:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Jeff Rense
I have removed material from that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 13:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
It is clear that this account is being used for repeated insertion of highly dubious material to biographies of living persons without regard to the many warnings not to do so. Moreover, it is apparent that this is account is only used when it is necessary to circumvent article semi-protection and that the same individual (or individuals acting in close collaboration) is making further similar edits anonymously. I had previously warned that you would banned from relevant articles under the special enforcement provision for the biographies of living persons policy. However, since the purpose of this account has become clear, I am simply blocking it indefinitely. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. CIreland (talk) 16:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

No Nazi crap here
WHAT I've found is that someone wants to place the children of the US, the UK and the rest of the planet on drugs. There is NO nazi crap there. The deplorable thing is that someone is making up FAKE illnesses so that children can be placed on dope, like ritalin, even on Prozac. The alleged reason is that children can no longer be children is that perverts are allowed to run amok in society, so the kids are locked up instead, and kids being what they are, "Big Pharma" says that they can be tranquilized until they become adults. Powerzilla (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

It appears that CIreland's permanent block on my contributions is motivated by his opposition to the exposure of the genocidal racist agendas of such Nazi sympathizers and agents as Gilad Atzmon, Jeff Rense and James Petras (among many others). In seeking to whitewash their Nazi politics, he ends up allying with them and is thus complicit in anti-Jewish discrimination, violence and genocide that their writings and words incite. I will therefore be bringing his complicity in that agenda to other Wikipedia editors and any other interested parties.