User talk:Antiqueight/Archive 2019

Question about Northern Ireland civil rights movement
I noticed you are a Wikipedian in Ireland. I wanted to ask you about the Northern Ireland civil rights movement. From your personal experience, what is the most common term used to denote that event in Ireland? Is it "Northern Ireland civil rights movement" or "civil rights movement". I'm focused on the American movement on Wikipedia. To my knowledge, the Northern Ireland civil rights movement is the only social or political movement, whether inside the United States or outside the States, to be called the civil rights movement other than the one in the States involving African Americans. I would appreciate your insight. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I would probably refer to it as "The Civil Rights Movement" especially if talking to people from the Island. Talking to people from outside or without context, I would probably put "Northern Ireland" in there to clarify which civil rights movement I was talking about.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 20:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red April Events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of List of non-binary writers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of non-binary writers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of non-binary writers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS ( talk to me  •  see what I've done ) 04:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Edits
Thanks for doing all you've done with the Wikipedia entry.

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzanne Rouvier Day.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Suzanne Rouvier Day.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Mary Eily de Putron
Did you read the article on Mary Eily de Putron? Amazing lady, big on art and archaeology.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I wrote that article - I'm glad you liked it. She really was amazing.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 15:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WiR stub contest
Hi there, Antiqueright, and thanks for participating in our stub contest. I've been checking the size of your articles and see that Marguerite Sayers and Anne Butler (engineer) are still too short. New stubs need to have at least 160 words of running text. You can check article length by using Xtools article info and checking the list under "Prose". Regina Moran is fine as it is. If you do not intend to increase the length of new stubs which are too short, you can list them under Newly-created stubs which do not meet contest rules where they will be available for others to destub next month. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Huh! I knew they were short but I didn't think they were that short. ORES was calling them Start - but again I didn't think they were that long..... OK- will review them and use the counter next time - I was assuming ORES was closer to right than that......Thanks for the headsup  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 14:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I also thought ORES was closer to the mark than that but after checking its results on a few stubs, I can see that tables and sources are also taken into account. I've now tried to make things clearer on the #140 priority page. We look forward to further contributions.--Ipigott (talk) 15:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Could you check those now - and the latest to be sure I'm reading the tool right - it tells me they all have over 160 words now but....  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 16:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * They are both fine now. Well done! Looking forward to more along the same lines.--Ipigott (talk) 16:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Louise Gavan Duffy
Hi, Sorry I can't do this myself but I would mess up the reference system (I don't know about snf). Could you change reference 10 so that one could click and go into the BMH ststement in the same way as with Eilis Ni Eachnaidh.Aineireland (talk) 12:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't know it was different- but indeed it was . I have added the other location rather than swapped it. But basically it should be the same file. Try it now (reference 11).  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 13:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that. I still think 10 will only cause confusion and frustration as it did me(I have been able to access the text a bit better from it after further exploration, but still unsatisfactory). I feel people might give up and not proceed to 11. But I assume you have your reasons. Aineireland (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , I wanted to be sure it was indeed the same item. I will get ride of the duplication once I've had a chance to read them properly...  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 18:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome, go raibh maith agat as ucht an failte!
Thanks Antiqueight!

I'm a bit too busy to edit much but will do what I can! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CailínDánta (talk • contribs) 20:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , don't worry - edit when you can, and if you ever need a hand just drop by.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 20:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Rhoda  Sivell
Good Evening   I  am  a cousin   of  Rhoda  Sivell    and  doing   some  research  on  her. I just  wondered  if  your   information  fits  in  with  mine. Maybe we  could  compare  notes.

Thank you

Rose Orr roseorr4@btinternet.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.68.193 (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019 at Women in Red
Hello. Today I edited the Wikipedia page of Nancy Wynne-Jones, a Welsh-Irish landscape painter. My edits were only to amend some known but not hugely important facts about her life & remove some inappropriate references to her personal life that were not necessary at all in the article. The edits themselves were not substantial.

I see that the edits to the article have now been undone, and that the inappropriate references have been returned.

Can the deletion of this edited article be reviewed and re-uploaded please?

With thanks in advance & kind regards, jfpfallon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfpfallon (talk • contribs) 14:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You've got mail
(cc: ) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Eolaíocht submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * I nominate Antiqueight to be Editor of the Week for outstanding and sustained contributions to creating, writing and editing Wikipedia pages. They have contributed over 24,500 global edits to Wikipedia projects and have recently completed their 300th page on Alix E. Harrow for WikiProject Women in Red. This page is a perfect example of their attention to detail in referencing. They are also involved in training new users in Ireland and they are an active member of the working group for Wikimedia Community Ireland. Antiqueight also actively thanks other editors in the community, positively acknowledging the work of other editors in a clear demonstration of the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. They definitely deserve to be Editor of the Week!

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! ― Buster7  &#9742;   14:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, Oh!! How lovely!  and     &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter
 * Congratulations! Well deserved. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! So happy you've received this honor as your work is appreciated! --Rosiestep (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Shelah
Re Shelah Richards: please supply page number(s) where she is mentioned. It is not p.249. Roryjohnston — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roryjohnston (talk • contribs) 06:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * - I don't have the book to hand anymore so I'm relying on the web preview which shows the references as on pages 78,94,96 and 99 anyway.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 09:24, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Juliet Macur
Hello and top of the morning to you -- I've just finished fixing up your stub article on Juliet Macur: reworded here & there, moved some things around, changed & added a bunch of categories. And because that one frightfully long paragraph needed to be split up, I was forced to leave all of the citations appended to the final sentence. Which means that you will need to go back and insert them in the correct places, since I had no way of knowing which citations belonged where. Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2019 (UTC)