User talk:Antiuser/Archive 4

Your signature
Hello, Antiuser. Your signature does not comply with the signature guidelines because it contains an image. Thank you.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 00:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There are no images in my signature, it's all text. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 00:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This is indeed true. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 07:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hi,

We need an administrator to the Modern Latin International language Wikipedia in Interlingua ( http://ia.wikipedia.org ). Because you know italian/portugese/spanish, then you can understand this language "a primer vista". If you are interested, please let me know :). --Akauno (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I don't know. I can understand it, yes, but not necessarily write it. Wouldn't that kind of be a pre-requisite? X X X antiuser eh? 21:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: February 2010
Hi, I was just relocating the information into a different category. It is all back in the article now. 71.10.245.44 (talk) 18:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, sorry about the incorrect warning then. You might want to use the edit summaries so it doesn't look like deliberate blanking. Again, apologies for the inconvenience. X X X antiuser eh? 18:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: What to do with userpages like this?
Re your message: I deleted it. That wasn't doing anything remotely constructive. It is a little outside of process to delete it, but I'm going to IAR and just delete it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Vivek Kundra - Vandalism/spam
Please help protect this page against the following changing IP address -

189.164.88.207 189.164.86.232 189.164.154.72 189.164.97.160 189.182.25.226 189.182.30.51 189.164.84.85 189.182.24.12 189.164.93.129 189.164.163.139

and many more ........ —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryGD (talk • contribs) 22:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'm not an administrator so I can't protect pages. You should go to WP:RFPP to request protection, or WP:ANI if the issue isn't vandalism. X X X antiuser eh? 22:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advice and help.

MaryGD (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Undoing
Hello, you recent undo of the vandalism on Carlo Gambino missed quite a bit. Please make sure that you undo all of the vandalism, otherwise it makes it even harder for others to undo. Thanks, Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I always do. You were just faster than me this time. X X X antiuser eh? 19:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * We all make mistakes sometimes, just making sure you were aware of it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I hear you. I was looking at the article history when I saw your revision :) X X X antiuser eh? 22:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Pensieve
Thanks! UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Mike Dreams
See Articles for deletion/Young Son. Eeekster (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. See reply on your talk page. X X X antiuser eh? 23:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Why not request for rollback
Hi there. I see that you have been reverting vandalism for quite a while now. I suggest you apply for permission to use the Rollback feature which gives you single-click undo access. It also allows you to use Huggle, a great antivandal tool. Thx, Manish Earth Talk •  Stalk 07:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, I'm a rollbacker already. Can't use Huggle because I'm on a Mac, so Twinkle is all I got. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 07:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Kk. Manish Earth Talk •  Stalk 07:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * It is, I believe, possible to run Huggle under Wine, though I can't say as I've tried it myself. See Wikipedia talk:Huggle. There's also a discussion about native mac versions in the future, though it goes over my head! Ged  UK  14:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I know about that, but I'm not installing Wine just to run Huggle... not worth the hassle. I'll stick with TW until something else comes along. X X X antiuser eh? 17:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No probs! Twinkle does me fine when I'm on my mac. Ged  UK  18:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

42 (song)
Hey there. You know, I got so caught up in copyediting and spellchecking and redlink-fixing on the 42(Song) article that I didn't even realize it wasn't quite up to notability standards. Is that criteria for speedy deletion or is it best to just leave up the prod tag? AlexHOUSE (talk) 23:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem to meet any of the WP:CSD - Coldplay are notable so A9 is out the door, but there's no info about the song itself in Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends, which it redirects to, so that's A10 out the door as well. I figured it was either AfD or PROD, and it seemed pretty non-controversial so I just PRODed it. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 23:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. I have to admit, I'm not very well-versed in editing music articles. That, and I have a pretty strong pro-Coldplay bias. Anyway, sounds good to me. AlexHOUSE (talk) 23:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not that well-versed myself, but the policy in this case is pretty clear. Happy editing! X X X antiuser eh? 23:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ron h jones (Talk) 20:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Vai tomar no cu
Darth Kracht (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your insult in perfect Portuguese. Unfortunately I can't do that, and if you keep this up you'll be indef blocked in no time. X X X antiuser eh? 14:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh look at that, you're blocked! X X X antiuser eh? 14:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globe_valve
Hi Antiuser:

With regard to the rollback on my edit (see above reference): the Valve page is in need of references, which is what I added. You cite my addition as a "spam reference", probably becasue the link is to a corporate website. However, you tolerate the presence of an external link to http://www.documentation.emersonprocess.com/groups/public/documents/book/cvh99.pdf on that same page, which is also a corporate website.

This is not the only reference of mine that you've reverted as "spam". I am not adding spam. For one, together with the references, I've been adding a number of high-resolution photos of valves on these articles, and most articles are void of decent any references, which is another value-added that my contributions to the different articles on spam.

Links to other corporations are also tolerated on other valve pages. On the Butterfly Valve article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_valve, you tolerate the manual-selling external link http://www.tpub.com/fireman/69.htm, similar to the Gate Valve article external link to the same site, the control valve article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_valves is littered with external company links: Spirax Sarco's http://www.spiraxsarco.com/resources/steam-engineering-tutorials/control-hardware-el-pn-actuation.asp, Emerson's http://www.documentation.emersonprocess.com/groups/public/documents/book/cvh99.pdf, Flow Control's http://www.flowcontrol.com/Animation/index.html and Samson's http://www.samson.de/support/enser002.htm. Same happens with Spirax Sarco's link on the Check Valve article page.

Please note that you are tolerating "External Links" to corporate websites, but my links are "References" to an article on valves on our site. So, external corporate links with no value-added to the text of the article are ok, but explanatory additions to the article with citations from corporate sites are not ok? So, you should apply the external link policy on a merit-basis, no just automatically. Please refer to my contribution to that page, check the external link and please respond as I can't see a convinving reason for deleting my references (citing them as corporate spam) but tolerating a dozen other corporate links on those very same pages. To me, that's an inconsistent application of the external link policy.

I look forward to receiving your response; I trust we will be able to deal with this constructively.

Thanks, Heather Smith (Alloyvalves) Heather Smith 16:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alloyvalves (talk • contribs)


 * I don't understand what you're talking about - I've never reverted any of your edits. The link I removed was added by User:Negarmottahedeh (see diff here), who had been adding commercial links contrary to the external links policy. Or are you saying User:Alloyvalves and User:Negarmottahedeh are both your accounts? In this case you would be violating WP:SOCK as well as WP:EL and risk being blocked for disruptive edits under multiple accounts. X X X antiuser eh? 17:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Here, have a cheeseburger: 

Acather96 (talk) has given you a Cheeseburger! Cheeseburgers promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Cheeseburger, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of Cheeseburgers by adding {{subst:Cheeseburger}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Acather96 (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Diet soda
I thought that the 3RR meant that editors couldn't make more than 3 reverts in less than 24 hours. My last revert on that page was a few days ago. Also, the facts I'm putting in are true, and there are references for them, too. 76.127.217.214 (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Read the warning again. I'll quote: "Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule.". Also, blogspot does not meet WP:V nor WP:RS. Find reliable sources that back your claim and it will then merit inclusion. X X X antiuser eh? 18:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have found some better references and I am about to add them to the article. 76.127.217.214 (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please discuss them in the talk page first. There's already a discussion going on about your additions on there. X X X antiuser eh? 19:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * But this is serious! People have died from those horrible sweeteners! This is depriving people of information they need to know! If more people knew how bad the sweeteners were, less people would die from them! 76.127.217.214 (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Then find a reliable source that reports a death caused by consumption of artificial sweeteners. A news article or a medical journal, not conspiracy or pseudo-science sites. Look at Cigarette and Health effects of tobacco for an example of properly-sourced claims to ill health effects by a product. X X X antiuser eh? 19:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

An unusual coincidence
Check this out. Now how would a "long time reader and first time editor" know about your editor review? Food for thought. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 07:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Quite strange indeed. I'm not going to get into that discussion because I don't know the history and can't tell what's going on but from what I know Bongo isn't an admin. X X X antiuser eh? 11:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * To be more precise - it's Nothughthomas :-) Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 11:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Now confirmed, in case you are at all interested. IP has been blocked, I know which one as it's not that hard to work out. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 14:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I still don't know what the deal is with them... Thanks for letting me know, though. X X X antiuser eh? 17:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

i would like to know how come ssome of the wikipedia pages dont have information that i need like who creates these pages is there any way that i can let them know what information is missing on there pages??? and the reason im wwritng this like this is because i dont know what im doing71.13.225.230 (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.225.230 (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your reversions on my userpage and talkpage. :o) Ged  UK  13:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You're most welcome! X X X antiuser eh? 17:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Sing out if you want your userpage protecting, I can't help but notice it gets hit. Ged  UK  13:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅. Ged  UK  08:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:71.251.227.10
Template:X3 is a sandbox template, so the edit by 71.251.227.10 wasn't vandalism (and if it was an actual template it would probably have been a good edit, as the text removed wouldn't usually belong in a template and appeared to be advertising). snigbrook (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I was thrown off by this edit summary. I struck my warnings on their page. X X X antiuser eh? 00:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Question re. WP:SELDEL
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ron h jones (Talk) 23:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

PROD vs. CSD
Thanks for placing the speedy delete tags on the two articles related to Quincy track and field that I had prodded. I've had a bit of trouble with the csd criteria in the past and felt safer using a prod, but if you thinks they can be speedy deleted, that's great! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There are no assertions of notability there, it was a pretty clear-cut case of A7. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 19:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined on Mojo (album)
I know; I added it after hitting the wrong button. I was actually trying to remove the damn thing myself when you E/Cd me :(. Ironholds (talk) 01:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry! It's all good then :) X X X antiuser eh? 01:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: MyFootpath
Hello Antiuser. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MyFootpath, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Ged UK  20:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't the one who nominated the article, I only restored the CSD tag that someone else placed in it after the article's author took it off. X X X antiuser eh? 01:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the CSDHelper script isn't clever enough to work that out! Sorry again :) Ged  UK  14:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (February)
–  Cs-wolves (talk)  19:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Chandhok
The source is not reliable - Spanish news agencies are notorious for making things up, and we've had several instances of it recently. I'm sure Chandhok will be announced on Thursday, but there's a reason why not a single motor sport news source has picked up on it, and that's because it's just not reliable enough. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've seen several instances of Spanish newspapers and magazines making stuff up, but even so that was always weaseled as "sources within the team" and such. EFE is a news agency, not a newspaper, and they clearly state the information came from Carabante himself. Being that they're Spanish, they'd be closest to the team and possibly have easier access to them. The site that published the info is Brazil's equivalent of Autosport and the only Brazilian media outlet to actually send personnel to the tests in Europe, so they definitely qualify under WP:RS. If you revert it again I won't readd the info per WP:3RR, but I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it as fluff. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 21:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm certainly not dismissing it as fluff, more that we need to be consistent with the sources we allow and the ones we don't. I know about EFE and also that, at best, they're only a reasonably reliable news agency. The other thing that slightly bothers me is that Campos / Hispania are clearly very tight financially (or else they wouldn't be hiring a third-rate paydriver like Chandhok) and if another driver turned up between now and Thursday with more cash, I'd be willing to bet he'd get the seat. I'm happy to side with Autosport et al and wait till Thursday. Others have reverted the addition of Chandhok elsewhere, but I'm happy to bend on it if others want it included. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to readd it if the consensus is to wait for Thursday. I just felt like the source was reliable per policy and we've added drivers before the press conferences before. Cheers, X X X antiuser eh? 21:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's probably a close-run thing, but my feeling is that it's just about wobbly enough to exclude. If someone else adds it though, I'll leave it. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to chip in, if you don't mind - the only time we usually put drivers in the table before the official release is when the leading sources, e.g. Autosport, BBC etc., start saying that the deal is done. I feel there must be some reason why Autosport haven't picked up on it yet. Regards, - mspete  93  23:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

"German Empire"
Look in the discussion section of the German Empire article. I gave the rationale for my edits there two days before I made them. The title of the article contains a misleading translation of the word Reich. Whoever wrote the article is also clearly unaware that the term Deutsches Reich (the term badly rendered as "German Empire") was revived in the 1930s (e.g. on German postage stamps), and therefore does not apply only to the German state from 1870-1918. The whole article is ill-conceived and poorly informed. The best salvation is to retitle it Second German Reich or something like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.1.3.105 (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI, I've already reported our anonymous friend for violation of WP:3RR. Hopefully an admin will be along soon to help. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was about to go and do it myself. X X X antiuser eh? 18:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Double counting
Huh. It's gotten changed & rf'd a couple of times...& I haven't kept up. Thx.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 18:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenthorne high
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrRandomPerson (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Huh? Why did I get this? I was the one who tagged the page. X X X antiuser eh? 23:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * not sure probably just one of those things. i think the courtesy blanking also wiped the history since your entry is the only one there. i thought it was odd as well :S

MrRandomPerson (talk) 23:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I think what happened was the page got deleted while I was tagging it, so it looks like I created it... I'm getting more and more frustrated with Twinkle as I use it. X X X antiuser eh? 23:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Antiuser/Macuser
You are not permitted to place non-free content, such as File:Apple-logo.png, on your userpage at User:Antiuser/Macuser. Please do not restore the Apple logo or any other non-free content to the userbox. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok, I didn't know it wasn't kosher to include it in a userbox. X X X antiuser eh? 22:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a problem! Thanks for being accommodating, --Hammersoft (talk) 22:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Reverted your revision to User:Antiuser/Macuser
Deleting this userbox would leave some red links on some userpages. I will place a free alternative of the apple logo in the userbox.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 22:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - I hope you don't mind.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 22:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Far better to delete it and take the one usage out of this user's userspace and have it point to something from Userboxes/Computing. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's not even transcluded anywhere but this user's page. Re-marking it for deletion, and removing it from the user's userpage. --22:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Already removed by the user, and I've retagged it for deletion. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's wait and see what Antiuser has to say about it. He may have tagged it for deletion because of the image. He may change his mind after the image I found.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 23:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's cool to just delete it. I was the only one using it anyway. X X X antiuser eh? 23:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

hey please help me out, don't block me
It won't let me move the page B.o.B. to B.o.B, I don't know what to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NewOrleans4Life (talk • contribs)
 * Please go to WP:RM to request a move. Do not move pages by cutting and pasting, as it does not preserve the page history. X X X antiuser eh? 22:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Matra logo
Hello, I have tried to insert a logo of Matra company in Matra article but I do not know how to insert pictures into wiki articles. Could you help me and make article about Matra better ? Thank you. The logo may comes from web page: http://auta5p.eu/katalog/matra/matra.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.40.240.88 (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (March)
–  Cs-wolves (talk)  13:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (April)
–  Cs-wolves (talk)  20:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Titin redirects listed at Redirects for discussion
I've started a discussion to address the redirects associated with Titin. Since you edited one or other of the redirects at some point, or discussed it on one of the talk pages, I wanted to notify you of the redirect discussion. Carcharoth (talk) 11:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (May)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (June)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (July)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  22:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (August)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  14:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk elections
Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC).

WPF1 Newsletter (September)
-- Midgrid (talk)  18:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (October)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  18:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (November)
-- Midgrid (talk)  23:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card


Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)





WPF1 Newsletter (December)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  17:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (January)
{| class="collapsible collapsed" ! colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; background: #CCDDEE; border: 1px solid LightSlateGray; padding: 1em;" | The WikiProject Formula One Newsletter Year IV · Issue 1 · January 1, 2011 – February 7, 2011 Previous month's issue
 * valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #ffffb1; width:50%" |
 * New users
 * New members –
 * (January 14)
 * (January 19)
 * New recipients –
 * (January 19)
 * New editors –
 * New editors –


 * WikiProject news
 * Check out Apterygial's My Insane Idea userproject, which aims to improve the 2008 Formula One season article and that season's Grands Prix to Featured Topic status.
 * Newsletter news


 * rowspan=2 valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #ffffb1; width:50%" |
 * Article developments


 * See also: WikiProject Formula One/Article alerts


 * Failed Good Article Nominees --
 * Indianapolis Motor Speedway


 * Completed Peer Reviews --
 * 2008 Hungarian Grand Prix


 * New articles –
 * Ferrari F150
 * Force India VJM04
 * Hispania F111
 * Lotus T128
 * McLaren MP4-26
 * Mercedes MGP W02
 * Red Bull RB7
 * Renault R31
 * Sauber C30
 * Toro Rosso STR6
 * Virgin MVR-02
 * Williams FW33
 * Deletions –
 * Formula One Future Races
 * Majorcan Grand Prix


 * valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #ffffb1; width:50%" |
 * Editors' Comment
 * Users are always welcome to help us with this newsletter. If you are interested, please leave a message on an existing editor's talkpage or sign up on the "Contributors" list of the central newsletter page, and we will tell you everything you need to know and answer your questions. Current contributors –
 * Users are always welcome to help us with this newsletter. If you are interested, please leave a message on an existing editor's talkpage or sign up on the "Contributors" list of the central newsletter page, and we will tell you everything you need to know and answer your questions. Current contributors –

Article requests: Erich Zakowski, Daniele Coronna, Hans Fouche, Chris Radage, Giorgio Stirano, Steve Tarrant, Intertechnique, 10 Tenths, Elf Masters Copyedit: Bahrain Grand Prix, History of Formula One, Monaco Grand Prix, 2006 San Marino Grand Prix, Rob White (Formula One), Rob Smedley Expand: F1-X Dubai, Honda RA271, Paddy Lowe, Red Bull RB3, Spyker F1, Toyota TF107, BMW Sauber F1.07, Mario Theissen, Franz Tost, Chinese Grand Prix, Colin Kolles, Concorde Agreement, Formula One Constructors Association, McLaren MP4/1, Ove Andersson, Bob Bell, Korean International Circuit, Grand Prix Drivers' Association, Spyker F8-VII, Arai (company), Shoei, Schuberth Helme GmbH, Bell Racing Company, Jim Bamber, Nazir Hoosein, Formula One video games, Make Cars Green, Jonathan Legard, Michael Turner (illustrator) more Update: History of Formula One, Toyota, Robert Doornbos, Formula One regulations, 2024 Formula One season, Scuderia Toro Rosso, Super Aguri F1, Divina Galica, Grand Prix World Championship 
 * How to help WPF1 –
 * Expand the articles in Category:Formula One stubs.
 * Read the project to-do list and help to complete the tasks:

<li>Images needed: Max Mosley, Sakon Yamamoto, Jordan Grand Prix circa 1992-1997, Paddy Lowe, 2008 Turkish Grand Prix more </li> <li>For more work, see this generated list or the Auxiliary list

Images
 * colspan="2" valign="top" align="center" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #FFFFB1" |
 * colspan="2" valign="top" align="center" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #FFFFB1" |

Below is the F1 Picture of the month (found here). The picture has to be one uploaded in the last month and only from the current season.
 * It is exclusive to the Newsletter. REMEMBER, YOU CAN VOTE.



Article of the month – 2008 Hungarian Grand Prix, peer-reviewed
 * colspan="2" valign="top" align="left" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #FFFFB1" |
 * colspan="2" valign="top" align="left" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #FFFFB1" |



The 2008 Hungarian Grand Prix (formally the XXIII ING Magyar Nagydíj) was a Formula One motor race held on August 3, 2008, at Hungaroring in Mogyoród, near Budapest, Hungary. It was the 11th race of the 2008 Formula One season. Contested over 70 laps, the race was won by Heikki Kovalainen for the McLaren team, from a second position start. Timo Glock finished second in a Toyota car, with Kimi Räikkönen third in a Ferrari. It was Kovalainen's first Formula One victory, which made him the sport's 100th driver to win a World Championship race, and was Glock's first podium finish.

The majority of the race consisted of a duel between Lewis Hamilton and Felipe Massa, who drove for McLaren and Ferrari respectively. Hamilton started from pole position on the starting grid but was beaten at the first corner by Massa, who passed him around the outside. The two championship rivals began a battle for the lead that was resolved when Hamilton sustained a punctured tyre just over half-way through the race, giving Massa a lead of over 20 seconds over Kovalainen. The Ferrari's engine, however, failed with three laps of the race remaining, allowing the McLaren driver to win. Räikkönen set the race's fastest lap in the other Ferrari, but was hampered by a poor qualifying performance and was stuck behind Alonso and Glock in turn for almost all of the race.

As a consequence of the race result, Hamilton extended his lead in the World Drivers' Championship to five points over Räikkönen, with Massa a further three behind. Robert Kubica, who finished eighth after finding his BMW Sauber car to be uncompetitive at the Hungaroring, slipped to 13 points behind Hamilton, ahead of his team-mate Nick Heidfeld and Kovalainen. In the World Constructors' Championship, McLaren vaulted BMW Sauber for second position, 11 points behind Ferrari.

(More...) 2011 Teams and Races From 2011 Formula One season
 * colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #ffffb1" |
 * colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: #ffffb1" |

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.
 * }

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Formula One at 17:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC).

WPF1 Newsletter (February)
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 03:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC).

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Bev Sanders
Hello Antiuser, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Bev Sanders to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. --43?9enter ☭msg☭contribs 07:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I disagree. I'm familiar with the CSD criteria and that article, though long, makes no credible assertion of notability compatible with WP:NOTE. X X X antiuser eh? 07:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * That's just a generic template. Ignore it if you want. Ok, now that I read every word meticulously, I can see what you mean. But still, some of those external links lead to a published paper, which I think is somewhere in WP:NOTE. Change it back to CSD if you want, but I think using PROD is less bite-y, and seeing as the person is a new editor the said person might be confused. --43?9enter ☭msg☭contribs 07:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Nah, I have no problem with the PROD being there. I just think speedy deletion, when applicable based on the CSD, is more effective for keeping WP cleaner. While I can see that it might seem bite-y, I would assume that users creating new articles would be at least a little bit familiar with how WP works. I'm always happy to help new users create article drafts in their userspace if the subject shows potential. Cheers! X X X antiuser eh? 07:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)