User talk:Antoine.rd19

Igor Gavva moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Igor Gavva, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello Antoine.rd19. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Antoine.rd19. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Praxidicae,
 * Thanks for your message.
 * I understand your concern, but I would like to confirm that I wasn't paid to add or edit this article. It's a free contribution.
 * If you found any information sounding like promotion please help to improve it or suggest what to do.
 * Thanks --Antoine.rd19 (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Do not remove coi templates yourself. If you have no connection to the subject please explain how you became the copyright holder of this photo Praxidicae (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Praxidicae,
 * I don't own this picture. I found it on internet without a copyright, so I didn't know how to put the right information on it. I made a mistake putting it as own work without really understanding what it means. I am new on Wikipedia and still learning how to do things properly.
 * I've removed the copyright and "Own work" mention from it now. Should I delete it or leave it like that?
 * Please advise what to do.
 * Thanks --Antoine.rd19 (talk) 13:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Igor Gavva for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Igor Gavva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Igor Gavva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 00:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)