User talk:Antoine Mallia

Drawing board
Hello, Antoine Mallia. Thank you for your note at the drawing board. You have a reply. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Thank you for your note. You have a reply. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The European Globalisation adjustment Fund
The problem with your link on Globalization was that the article title is "The European Globalisation adjustment Fund", and you missed the "The" at the start. That said, there should be redirect pages put together since others will also miss the "The". I've set up one of these here, should you be unaware of how these things work. And I've added the link in Globalization. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Flexicurity
Did you notice that as a result of your last edit, we have the same text twice: once in a a reference, and once in the text? Please be carefull. I'll revert your last edit, untill you decide whether to have that sentence as a footnote or in the main text, but not both. Debresser (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Debresser, Thank you for the edit. I am very new to Wiki so I am learning as I go. I have a question: I would like to centre justify the title in the framed text 'The Common Principles of Flexicurity'. Can you help? Thanks in advance,(Antoine Mallia (talk) 08:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)).


 * I'm afraid that those kinds of things are very much not my area. :) You'd probably get a swift and accurate response if you asked at the help desk, which draws people who are familiar with many different aspects of Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd advise against that whole section being in a table (and hence against centre justifying a table header). The section is text, and will do very well as paragraphs, or perhaps bullet points or autonumbering (start each paragraph with a #), with an ordinary level 3 header, such as ===The common principles of flexicurity=== . I think a rather more pressing problem is that there is no reference for these common principles - presumably they are as published by the Employment and Social Affairs Council; I can infer this but nothing in the article specifies the origins of these common principles. And I am also concerned about copyright considerations - whose copyright are the words? Meanwhile I have amended the table to centre the header, just so you can see one way of doing it. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)