User talk:Antoinesdad

Voltcan
Thank you for creating . Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 16:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove the clean-up templates from Voltcan; instead, you should read them, read the stuff they link to, &c. See the note from Tohd8BohaithuGh1, too. Jack Merridew 03:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Voltcan
A tag has been placed on Voltcan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Voltcan and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.


 * Antoinesdad

Seeing as you're a single purpose account spamming this onto multiple wikis and I found quite little about this company out there, I feel it's time to step up a level. Jack Merridew 04:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Voltcan
I have nominated Voltcan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Voltcan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VX! talk 01:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2011
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Briefs. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. You have added similar links to other articles. OSbornarfcontribs. 20:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Undergarment‎. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 04:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)