User talk:AntonDickson

May 2012 Reply
i'm simply updating the information, and correcting the things that was incorrect. thank you, kind regards

Proposed deletion of Liam Cole


The article Liam Cole has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No independent and reliable sources to be found. JRL awards first year was 2010, so not exactly the same caliber as an GayVN Awards award.  Fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:PORNBIO

This article should not be deleted, here are some references to highlight this: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3228807/ http://toughdad3.bestmalediaries.com/?page_id=3928 http://daveadven.tripod.com/id2.html http://menofcolor.blogs.com/moc_blog/2011/11/liam-coles-in-the-flesh.html

Also why was all the information for Anton Z Risan removed? such as external links, background information and life etc?
 * Eh, because personal websites and blogs are not acceptable sources for encyclopedic articles, and because you are spamming, basically. Drmies (talk) 22:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

The article Liam Cole has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to be notable: unverified, non-notable awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Liam Cole for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liam Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as seen at Anton Z. Risan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your edits are obviously promotional. You may not add unverified material to a BLP, certainly not if it's not neutral. If anyone doubted that you are abusing Wikipedia for promoting yourself, they only need to look at the External links you added.'' Drmies (talk) 22:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I apologies but I was under the belief that one could add links to external sites, my misstake regarding that, However why has now the early life / history and work related information been removed now - again?
 * I simply don't understand this? Sorry I'm new to wikipedia and I'm trying to understand the processes of the postings etc. Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntonDickson (talk • contribs)


 * You added material that was not referenced. You also added social networking links such as tumbler and blogs.  Material needs to be referenced with reliable sources.  WP:SOURCES has info on what is reliable.  You are also editing your own Wikipedia page which is frowned upon.  WP:AVOIDCOI has the long gory details about conflicts of interest.  Essentially, adding any unreferenced material to your own page is forbidden. Only small edits, such as copy edits or adding reliable references are ok.  Failure to stop adding unreliable edits ends up in resulting in being banned.  Bgwhite (talk) 06:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi again, if you look back in the history, initially I did not add the main text, and it had relevant links to references, (imdb pages containing information, as well as interviews with me), example Bruce laBruce etc, It was taken down for some reason and I was just re-putting it in, — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntonDickson (talk • contribs)


 * Doesn't matter who did it, IMDb and interviews are unreliable. They should be removed. Bgwhite (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Okidoki, may I just suggest making a comparison with other entries. Such as http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcel_Schlutt#section_1 for example, can someone please clarify for me what the differences are to this type of entry?


 * Stop removing my replies. Don't remove another editor's message.  Also, please sign you message with ~.
 * Use the correct address for Schlutt. It is Marcel Schlutt.  Also, don't compare with other articles.  Not every article is upto regs.  Comparing one that doesn't follow the rules does not mean your article cannot follow the rules.  Bgwhite (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Dean Monroe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean Monroe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dean Monroe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)